Quoting Sam Hartman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If you were annoyed that it took too long to deal with translation
> NMUs then you probably should have asked for permission to make
> arbitrary 0-day NMUs for translation purposes.
Hmmm, wel I think I did ask. At least, I announced all NMU's and took
th
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 12:03:55AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > Drawbacks I see at the moment (Christian will most probably see thousands
> > > > more ;)):
> > > Another point that needs to be considered is version control between releases:
> > > the stable distribution needs different tran
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:54:09PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > The evms module in the installer does not work.
>
> Yeah, evms support in debian-installer is not very well
> tested/developed at all. LVM will work, though.
I am interested in getting it working, but d-i development seems ra
Hello, I have a special_offer for you...
WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT?
The most powerful weightloss is now available
without prescription. All natural Adipren720
100% Money Back Guarantée!
- Lose up to 19% Total Body Weight.
- Up to 300% more Weight Loss while dieting.
- Loss of 20-35% abdominal Fat.
- Redu
That's strange. Can you send us enough info about this service
partitionso we can try to set one up, and perhaps reprocude the bug?
Thepartition layout, partition type, and the first several kilobytes
ofsuch a partition might suffice to do it.
It's listed as a compaq service partition in c
Folks,
Thanks to some surprising sleuth work by Boris Gontar we might have a
workaround for the dastardly initrd bug affecting certain sparc64
machines.
So, without further ado:
* http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-06-04/cdrom-mini.iso (4.7M)
* http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/d
Stephen T. Bellis wrote:
> I figured out that this problem is caused by the service partition on the
> hard drive.
>
> I don't know why but if there is no service partition everything goes fine.
> Having the service partition causes d-i to not be able to detect the cdrom.
That's strange. Can you
Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:46:33PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> > > Drawbacks I see at the moment (Christian will most probably see thousands
> > > more ;)):
> > Another point that needs to be considered is version control between releases:
> > the stable distribution
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:46:33PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Drawbacks I see at the moment (Christian will most probably see thousands
> > more ;)):
> Another point that needs to be considered is version control between releases:
> the stable distribution needs different translations from testi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 04 June 2004 23:32, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:29:19PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Drawbacks I see at the moment (Christian will most probably see thousands
> more ;)):
>
Another point that needs to be cons
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:29:19PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [Actually, this has been causing me to conclude that we probably need a
> mechanism whereby translators can cause new translations to appear
> outside of the structure of the "package" itself.
This seems to me like an interestin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 04 June 2004 06:58, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I'm going to run the script manually over the next couple of weeks to
> > further test it. If it proves stable, I will put it in a cron job that I
> > w
I figured out that this problem is caused by the service partition on the
hard drive.
I don't know why but if there is no service partition everything goes fine.
Having the service partition causes d-i to not be able to detect the cdrom.
- Original Message -
From: "Joey Hess" <[EMAIL PRO
I fail to see the problem here. The shadow package has needed a lot
of translation work. You've done that work, you've done the NMUs.
Everyone is happy.
If you were annoyed that it took too long to deal with translation
NMUs then you probably should have asked for permission to make
arbitrary 0-
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Official NetInst Snapshot sparc Binary-1 (20040530)
uname -a:
Date: June 4, 2004
Method: boot from CD
Machine: Sun Microsystems sun4u Sun Blade 100 (UltraSPARC-IIe)
Processor:SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIe
Memory:1280Mb
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/par
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Well, no, if you tell a package maintainer that it "has been decided" that
> you're going to use infrastructure that the maintainer refuses to rely on,
> that is most certainly a takeover.
Hmmm, the point that you don't want to use the Alioth infr
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Karl and Sam,
>
> During Debconf4, there has been some discussions within the d-i team
> and some maintainers of Custom Debian Distributions (mostly
> Skolelinux) about the status of the Debian package for shadow.
>
> As you have obviously no
Package: boot-floppies
Version: Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 "Woody" - Official i386 Binary-1 CD
flavor:ide-pci
architecture: i386
model:
memory:256MB
scsi: nome
cd-rom: ATAPI SANSUNG see>
n
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official
NetInst Snapshot i386 Binary-1 (20040315)uname -a: -
Date: April 24, 2004
Method: Boot and install directly from CD
Machine: Homebuilt w Matsonic MS7016S mb
Processor: Celeron 366
Memory: 256Mb
Roo
I just got debian-installer from svn, and notice that the README at
the top recommends reading README and goals.txt in installer/doc. In
fact, both are in installer/doc/historic.
It's also not clear to me if the material in the historic subdirectory
is obsolete, or partially out of date, as well
Hi,
on amd64 several people have experienced the problem that after
install + first boot the network isn't working anymore.
The /etc/network/interfaces file is not written during installation so
no network is started at boot. The right modules on the other hand are
loaded.
Now my question: Is t
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:58:31AM +0200, Miguel Frasson wrote:
> Tha manual is written in such way that it seems to say: "beginners
> should avoid Debian" or "are not good enough to install Debian."
Thank you for your suggestions. I've been in the process of reworking
the installation manual and
Frank Kirschner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to compile the latest debian-installer, but have problems with
> dependencies:
Is this from the SVN repository?
[snip]
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> netcfg-static: Depends: libiw27 (>= 26+27pre10)
> zipl-installer: Depends: base-i
After successful booting from image:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/20040603/sarge-sparc-businesscard.iso
I am unable to load ide-cd.o module for 2.4.26-sparc64 kernel.
The message is:
# modprobe ide-cd
Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-sparc64/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-cd.o
insmod:
After successful booting from image:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/20040603/sarge-sparc-businesscard.iso
I am unable to load ide-cd.o module for 2.4.26-sparc64 kernel.
The message is:
# modprobe ide-cd
Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-sparc64/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-cd.o
insmod
Hi,
I want to compile the latest debian-installer, but have problems with
dependencies:
# make build_generic
(set -e; \
echo "# This file is automatically generated, edit sources.list.udeb.local instead."; \
if [ "x" != "x" ]; then \
Burnett,}
Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month?
-800 MB Disk Space
-Unlimited email accounts
-FREE Shopping Cart... and much more!
Please contact us to take advantage of this new offer at
http://www.clickhostdeals.com
delicatessen
Package: base-config
Version: 2.25
Base Config contains the following .svn directory.
/usr/lib/base-config/menu/.svn/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mcmahon,*
Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month?
-800 MB Disk Space
-Unlimited email accounts
-FREE Shopping Cart... and much more!
Please contact us to take advantage of this new offer at
http://www.clickhostdeals.com
delta
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Debian boot people
I would like to try out Debian, but I don't have enough knoledge to
even read that i386 installation manual and I doubt that many people
have.
The installation manual could include tips for non experts. It starts
in actually knowing that one is using i386. Not everybody k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 247734 - pending
Bug#247734: debian-installer: incorrect /etc/hosts localhost line
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
G E TY O U R U N I V E R S I T Y D I P L O M A
Do you want a prosperous future, increased earning power more money and the respect of
all?
Call this number: 1 775 490 9881 (24 hours)
There are no required tests, classes, books, or interviews!
Get a Bachelors, Masters, MBA, GED
Package: install
Severity: important
The bug report is related to the following ISO images:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/20040602/sarge-sparc-businesscard.iso
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/tc1/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
http://cdimage.
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Quoting Archive Administrator ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > ddetect_0.100_i386.changes couldn't be processed for 48 hours and is now deleted
> > All files it mentions are also removed:
> > ddetect_0.100.dsc, ddetect_0.100.tar.gz, hw-detect_0.100_all.ude
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 252552 libdebian-installer4
Bug#252552: libdebian-installer.so.4: version `LIBDI_4.3' not found
Bug reassigned from package `cdebootstrap' to `libdebian-installer4'.
> sev
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 19:18 -0400, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> I've got an RBEM56G-100, which I assume is similar. I've discovered
> that it doesn't work if the "xircom_tulip_cb" module is loaded, but does
> work if only the "xircom_cb" module is loaded.
He did say earlier that he had a 16-bit (non
37 matches
Mail list logo
