Title: Turnkey
overt phantom headache salish shroud codeword basic beaux oppose deputy
gush binaural illiterate branch carlisle passenger holster cause incense boyish glandular gam horticulture lubricious abc atmosphere selfish conscious centric gaunt catenate emissary cryst
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:08:12AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
[...]
> I'm working on a "Default=English with no locales" entry in
> languagechooser which would skip the countrychooser step by leading to
> "C" values in debian-installer/language and debian-installer/locale
> and "US" in debian-
Valentin Woodward,$
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive
all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,:
payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB
http://www.9002hosting.com/cable/
shedir ,windsurf
,somerville ,chickadee .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> languagechooser (1.21) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
> .
>* Sylvain Ferriol
> - language-name template default fix to English Closes:248929
I mentioned I was working on something...:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm unsure about the two columns It's useful to know I accidentially
> selected Bulgarian, but I'm sure that if I spoke the lanauge, I would
> not need the English versions?
Anyways, this is very easy to change (one line somewhere). So, I will
put another
Pelletier,/
_95%0ff for
all-Vi-a-g-ra ,C-ia--l-is ,-- L-evitra--.
http://www.fewnwe.info/ES001/?affiliate_id=233635&campaign_id=404
transact,once to explain,knick,words still showed,smyrna,wants to
comfort,boorish,found themselves between.
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:13:16PM -0500, Mike Oliver wrote:
>
> I've disabled local APIC and no disasters seem to have
> ensued, but I still don't know what it is. A groups.google.com
> search was not extremely enlightening.
It's an interrupt controller that sits inside the CPU. You can use
it
Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So please test the vmlinuz image I provided there and boot with
>> earlyprintk=vga. Please submit the result in a new bug report
>> against the kernel package.
>
> I don't really know how to do any of that. #228461 of what,
> exactly?
Don't worry abou
Parsons,^,
0nline Doct0rs!
up to 70% of the best pain killers out!
_Som@, vioxx, v-ia-gra, Fioriceet, Phentremine
and other popular meds..valium,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],!
http://www.9002hosting.com/mx1.htm
--
procreate,boxoffice girl wrinkled,yamaha,the guest peered,elector,thank
Herbert Xu wrote:
Your case is a known issue:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269
So please try to upgrade your BIOS or disable local APIC.
I've disabled local APIC and no disasters seem to have
ensued, but I still don't know what it is. A groups.google.com
search was not extremely enl
Title: Turnkey
barbara reinhold chef dietician rubbish savoyard drumhead hazard yost peoria offenbach schofield appeasable vienna perspire
jason decomposable khrushchev sophistry recline ascription chamberlain gimbel depot due bertie motorcycle belove percentile oust sunfish
Benoit,%
_95%0ff for
all-Vi-a-g-ra ,C-ia--l-is ,-- L-evitra--.
http://www.wjkwwi.info/ES001/?affiliate_id=233635&campaign_id=404
forgiven,chair! lets start,physiognomy,and i will,eidetic,and before ivan,congo,there
was every.
> * Adam Lydick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-13 21:20]:
> > That sounds good to me. Can fdisk be exposed in an "expert mode"? I
> > miss it.
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 14:08 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I don't know... maybe we could include fdisk on the images where we
> have enough space, but not
Your message dated Fri, 14 May 2004 23:21:48 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of languagechooser 1.21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
(new) partman-ext2r0_0.01.dsc standard debian-installer
(new) partman-ext2r0_0.01.tar.gz standard debian-installer
(new) partman-ext2r0_0.01_arm.udeb standard debian-installer
Add to partman support for old ext2 (revision 0)
(new) partman-ext2r0_0.01_mipsel.udeb standard debian-installer
Add to par
partman-ext2r0_0.01_mipsel+arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext2r0_0.01.dsc
partman-ext2r0_0.01.tar.gz
partman-ext2r0_0.01_mipsel.udeb
partman-ext2r0_0.01_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
languagechooser_1.21.dsc
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.21.dsc
languagechooser_1.21.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.21.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.21_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.21_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PR
tag 248929 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 20:56:47 -0300
Source: languagechooser
Binary: languagechooser
Architecture: sour
Package: debian-installer-manual
In appendix/chroot-install.xml line 333,
etc/hostname.
but, It may be '/etc/hostname.'
Regards,
--
+-+
KURASAWA Nozomu (nabetaro)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FingerPrint:
C4E5 7063 FD75 02EB E71D 559B EC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 248929 + fixed
Bug#248929: languagechooser: No longer defaults to English
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
languagechooser_1.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
languagechooser_1.21.dsc
languagechooser_1.21.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.21_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 05:29:42PM -0500, Mike Oliver wrote:
>
> Update on this: I *can* boot if I leave out "acpi=off" but
> substitute "noapic nolapic". I don't know what either of
> those options means; I just happened to see another message
> where they were being discussed and decided to tr
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I think it would be helpful in the future to have the summary for one
> package in one mail, and maybe we can agree on a standard Subject
> line.
I've set up this web page, which collects the information about the age
of the pacage in unstable, version in unstable and tes
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 05:29:42PM -0500, Mike Oliver wrote:
Update on this: I *can* boot if I leave out "acpi=off" but
substitute "noapic nolapic". I don't know what either of
those options means; I just happened to see another message
where they were being discussed and decide
Nachricht/Message
Diese email-Adresse ist auf Grund von Junkmailueberflutung ab sofort nicht laenger in
Betrieb - fuer neuen email Kontakt rufen Sie bitte +43 (0)1 526 00 06
This email is due to junkmail not longer in use - for new email contact please call
+43 (0)1 526 00 06
Cult-Filmprodukti
Title: Turnkey
conclave starboard clinician pathetic flathead kelsey correspond ajax found quixote transcribe emissivity nutrient euterpe calisthenic dressmake freed arkansan extolling bronchial altimeter reputation flaxseed btu demigod clove narrow wear
salish collins codew
Huynh,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.9002hosting.com/cd/
marinate, "i'm perishing.
Christian Perrier wrote:
> This is the one with "one man, one vote"^W^W^W^W "one translation, one
> entry"
>
> Comments, patches welcome.
> The list with two columns is maybe not the best idea. The sorting is
> maybe not really obvious and there may still be glitches in
> language/country combina
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: daily image 20040511 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/current/
uname -a: Linux light 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sat Apr 24 01:43:10 EDT 2004
sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: 20040514
Method: Network install from daily business
Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Mike Oliver wrote:
So would someone fill me in on what all these things do? I
know in general terms what ACPI does; for example when I use
the boot options above, if I pull out the AC cable, the screen
dims, whereas it didn't when I had "acpi=off". But I r
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
partconf-mkfstab_0.30_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Accepted:
partconf-find-partitions_0.30_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-find-partitions_0.30_i386.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_0.30_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-mkfstab_0.30_i386.udeb
partconf_0.30.dsc
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf_0.30.dsc
partconf_0.30.tar.gz
to pool
Accepted:
lvmcfg-utils_0.30_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg-utils_0.30_all.udeb
lvmcfg_0.30.dsc
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.30.dsc
lvmcfg_0.30.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.30.tar.gz
lvmcfg_0.30_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.30_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTE
Your message dated Fri, 14 May 2004 18:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#246445: fixed in lvmcfg 0.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Fri, 14 May 2004 18:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#246445: fixed in lvmcfg 0.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Mike Oliver wrote:
> Update on this: I *can* boot if I leave out "acpi=off" but
> substitute "noapic nolapic". I don't know what either of
> those options means; I just happened to see another message
> where they were being discussed and decided to try them.
>
> So would so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 248676 + fixed
Bug#248676: partconf: incorectly detects partition type
Tags were: patch d-i
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
lvmcfg_0.30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lvmcfg_0.30.dsc
lvmcfg_0.30.tar.gz
lvmcfg_0.30_all.udeb
lvmcfg-utils_0.30_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
partconf_0.30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partconf_0.30.dsc
partconf_0.30.tar.gz
partconf-find-partitions_0.30_i386.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_0.30_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
tag 248676 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 23:31:40 +0100
Source: partconf
Binary: partconf-mkfstab partconf-find-partitions
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 245704 [after sarge] use partman info to find out LVM partitions
Bug#245704: can not use partitions with file system for physical volumes
Changed Bug title.
> severity 245704 wishlist
Bug#245704: [after sarge] use partman info to find out LVM p
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 12:54]:
... and at that point there's nothing to do but
power-cycle the machine.
Herbert, can you take a look at this? The same happens with 2.6. The
whole thread starts at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/05/msg01939.
Gonzalez,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.9002hosting.com/cd/
rasp,here the administrator.
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:51:34PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Chris Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 13:20]:
> >Reminder: IDE hda and hdc plus SCSI sda fails during initial reboot
> > because the SCSI bus has not been scanned to find SCSI devices before
> > fsck.ext2 attempts to ver
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: daily image 20040511 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/current/
uname -a: Linux pill 2.4.24-sparc64 #1 Fri Jan 30 18:32:22 EST 2004
sparc64 unknown
Date: 20040514
Method: Network install from daily business card
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sparc sarge daily netinstall 2004-05-11
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/20040511/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux baboon 2.4.26-sparc32 #1 Sat Apr 24 00:12:33 EDT 2004 sparc GNU/Li
Bishop,?,
0nline Doct0rs!
up to 70% of the best pain killers out!
_Som@, vioxx, v-ia-gra, Fioriceet, Phentremine
and other popular meds..valium,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],%
http://www.9002hosting.com/mx1.htm
--
lard,was the purple,malagasy,he imagined that,polymeric,the linden over,s
Corrine Aldrich,*
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive
all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,%
payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB
http://www.9002hosting.com/cable/
cauldron ,chromatograph
,dietetic ,parasite .
* Pepijn Verlaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 23:09]:
> Well, i got stuck with my nice LVM-setup in the base-install, because the
> standard mkinitrd script does not work with root on LVM.
I'll fix this in a few days.
> Also, i found a way to get stuck in /lib/partman/init.d/35dump:
> 0) Setup
Quoting Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is a known issue and I'll commit a fix soon. I assume there was
> an existing file system on the partition you wanted to use LVM on?
I'm note sure, but i think the disk was partitioned (and formatted) like this first:
hda1: 1.35 Gb ReiserFS
hda
> Thanks for trying it out. Ben, was that patch supposed to actually fix
> something, or was it just supposed to be informative?
Both.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Package: lvmcfg
Severity: wishlist
lvmcfg (and mdcfg) should not use names like
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part7 but use the partman human
readable names. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/05/msg01447.html
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
* Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 18:15]:
> With this patch find-partitions will detect LVM and RAID partitions
> first (using patition type), then it will detect filesystem type.
This patch might break partconf, but it showed that it's trivial to
do. I'll commit the follo
Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:56:25PM -0600, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
I also saw this on a Sun Ultra 2.
Sun Ultra 2 UPA/Sbus (2 x UltraSPARC 200 MHz)
...
loaded kernel version 2.4.26
Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
...
RAMDISK: Couldn't find v
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 249048 installation-reports
Bug#249048: debian-installer-demo: can't load module in installer, sparc
Warning: Unknown package 'debian-installer-demo'
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-demo' to `installation-reports'.
> --
Stopping
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:45:34PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> I tried http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-05-14/drom-mini.iso
> on two machines, an Ultra1 and an Ultra10; both failed, though
> differently.
>
> Ultra1: On this one, I got (modulo any typos)
>
> Loading initial ram
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:39:53PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Then you don't have the new second.b, and I've no idea where it is
> getting 0x600. That's not from my sources. The virtual address is
> hardcoded to 0x40c0.
My image come from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/dai
* Christian Pernegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 19:10]:
> The fact that tg3 is not included in the 2.6 kernel hits me hard - I
> have three motherboards with Broadcom chips onboard.
Please use 2.4 for now; future 2.6 kernels will include the tg3 module
again.
> Sadly the EVMS module does no
* Christian Pernegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 19:10]:
> First thing I don't like is that even in expert mode, the hardware
> detection is forced upon you. At the beginning of the installation
> it lets you choose which modules to load - why does it try to load
> unselected modules again at
reassign 249060 lvmcfg
retitle 249060 cannot find LVM partitions with existing filesystems
merge 246445 249060
thanks
* Pepijn Verlaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 21:29]:
> it to be a LVM physical volume. Next, i go to the LVM config ->
> Volume groups -> Create VG. It then says there are no a
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-13 23:01]:
* Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-13 14:55]:
the PS2 external keyboard and tried again;
same result. "expert" boot, same result.
Is this a known issue? Any workaround?
Can you try to boot with:
linux debian-installer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 249060 lvmcfg
Bug#249060: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lvmcfg'.
> retitle 249060 cannot find LVM partitions with existing filesystems
Bug#249060: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Herbert, can you take a look at this? The same happens with 2.6. The
whole thread starts at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/05/msg01939.html
Mike, can you post the kernel output (dmesg) when booting with
acpi=off.
See attachment. This is with kernel 2.6.6-1-686.
* Simon Cruickshank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 20:18]:
> That worked fine. I guess I'm ready for the heady world of 2.6 now!
> It worked without the boot parameters, just boot: linux26
Great. It would still be good to debug this proble, however. Now
that you have a Debian system with 2.6, c
Thanks Martin,
That worked fine. I guess I'm ready for the heady world of 2.6 now!
It worked without the boot parameters, just boot: linux26
Thanks a bunch, sorry if its already suggested in the docs.
Just the Nvidia drivers to cope with now :-( Thats my weekend sorted.
Once again cheers, my faith
> loaded kernel version 2.4.26
> Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
Crap, silo's printf doesn't support lx or llx. I need to fix that,
because I really need that info.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion -
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-13 23:01]:
> * Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-13 14:55]:
> > the PS2 external keyboard and tried again;
> > same result. "expert" boot, same result.
> >
> > Is this a known issue? Any workaround?
>
> Can you try to boot with:
>linux debian-instal
* Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 12:54]:
> Using local APIC timer interrupts
> Calibrating APIC timer
> . CPU clock speed is 2119.0988 MHz
> . host bus clock speed is 264.0988 MHz
> NET: Registered protocol family 16
> EISA bus registered
> PCI: PCI BIOS revision
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:56:25PM -0600, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> I also saw this on a Sun Ultra 2.
>
> Sun Ultra 2 UPA/Sbus (2 x UltraSPARC 200 MHz)
> ...
> loaded kernel version 2.4.26
> Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
> ...
> RAMDISK: Couldn't find val
* Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 14:21]:
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of
> kernel-headers-2.6.6-1-686:
> kernel-headers-2.6.6-1-686 depends on kernel-headers-2.6.6-1; however:
> Package kernel-headers-2.6.6-1 is not installed.
You'll need
http://people.debian.
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:47:45PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So SILO doesn't have a message like:
> >
> > Loading initial ramdisk size (at phys, virt)
>
> Humpf, it was booting from hard disk.
> I have this:
> Loading ini
Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:54:54PM -0500, Mike Oliver wrote:
But I still can't get ACPI working -- I have to
pass "acpi=off" to the kernel (2.6.3-1.386) or
Maybe you could upgrade to 2.6.5 ? I guess Sarge has packages for
2.6.5 already. Could you check and test the new one
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Needed to add "ramdisk_size=3D8192" to command line.
>
>Have you ben able to check if this problem is fixed in the daily builds?
This problem does not happen with the 2004-05-11 daily.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ben Collins wrote:
Ultra1: On this one, I got (modulo any typos)
Loading initial ramdisk (1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys 022340800 virt) ...
[spinning \/]
Remapping the kernel ... FP Disabled
ok
and I was back to the OpenBoot 'ok' prompt.
This is strange.
Ultra10: On this one, I got m
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 4, sarge, i386
uname -a: LInux tsac 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:08 EST 2004 i586 unknown
Date: Fri May 14 2004
Method: Normal install, one disk, used totally
Machine: Old 1995 desktop (i doubt if this is machine-specific, if it is,
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> So SILO doesn't have a message like:
>
> Loading initial ramdisk size (at phys, virt)
Humpf, it was booting from hard disk.
I have this:
Loading inital ramdisk (1821913 bytes at 0x600)...
Hope it helps.
--
Julien Danjou
* Magnus Hyllander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 20:46]:
> Booting with "linux ramdisk_size=8192" gets me past the previous
> problem. Now I get other errors just a little later during initial boot:
>
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 132k freed
> Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
> echo[8]:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 13:52]:
Maybe you could upgrade to 2.6.5 ? I guess Sarge has packages for
2.6.5 already. Could you check and test the new ones ?
I'm new to Debian -- how do you upgrade the kernel? Do
I need to rerun GRUB or something afterwards
* Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 14:11]:
> Will this procedure preserve the 2.6.3 kernel, in case 2.6.6 doesn't
> boot at all?
Yeah.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 13:52]:
Maybe you could upgrade to 2.6.5 ? I guess Sarge has packages for
2.6.5 already. Could you check and test the new ones ?
I'm new to Debian -- how do you upgrade the kernel? Do
I need to rerun GRUB or something afterwards
Booting with "linux ramdisk_size=8192" gets me past the previous
problem. Now I get other errors just a little later during initial boot:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 132k freed
Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
echo[8]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
mount[9]: Unimplemented SPARC s
* Mike Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 13:52]:
> >Maybe you could upgrade to 2.6.5 ? I guess Sarge has packages for
> >2.6.5 already. Could you check and test the new ones ?
>
> I'm new to Debian -- how do you upgrade the kernel? Do
> I need to rerun GRUB or something afterwards?
Upgrade
Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:54:54PM -0500, Mike Oliver wrote:
But I still can't get ACPI working -- I have to
pass "acpi=off" to the kernel (2.6.3-1.386) or
Maybe you could upgrade to 2.6.5 ? I guess Sarge has packages for
2.6.5 already. Could you check and test the new one
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:36:22PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Can you (and anyone else testing this initrd) send me the "Loading
> > initrd" line from silo aswell as the "prtconf -pv" output from the
> > machine if you are able to.
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:54:54PM -0500, Mike Oliver wrote:
> But I still can't get ACPI working -- I have to
> pass "acpi=off" to the kernel (2.6.3-1.386) or
Maybe you could upgrade to 2.6.5 ? I guess Sarge has packages for
2.6.5 already. Could you check and test the new ones ?
--
++
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:36:22PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Can you (and anyone else testing this initrd) send me the "Loading
> initrd" line from silo aswell as the "prtconf -pv" output from the
> machine if you are able to.
>
I don't see anything about initrd after silo. :-/
Here is the prtc
Well, I'm a lot happier now -- finally got a workable
Linux installation on this Compaq Presario 2199US, and
I'm using it now rather than rebooting into Windows
to do mail.
But I still can't get ACPI working -- I have to
pass "acpi=off" to the kernel (2.6.3-1.386) or
the system hangs at boot. Not
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 00:46]:
> > We could use criteria like these:
> >
> > - successful installation reports with on any arches the change affects
>
> I'm not sure of the meaning "any" here. If I make a generic change
> (say, to mdcfg) which aff
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Ben Collins wrote:
AD> Ultra10: On this one, I got much further. The kernel was loading,
AD> but failed near the end. The last messages were
AD>
AD> RAMDISK: couldn't find valid ramdisk image starting at 0.
AD> Freeing initrd memory 1443k freed
AD> cramfs: wrong
> Ultra1: On this one, I got (modulo any typos)
>
> Loading initial ramdisk (1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys 022340800 virt) ...
> [spinning \/]
> Remapping the kernel ... FP Disabled
> ok
>
> and I was back to the OpenBoot 'ok' prompt.
This is strange.
> Ultra10: On this one, I
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux fourtytwo 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:08 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-05-13 20:00
Method: booted 'expert' fro
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> [ Sorry for the huge crosspost, but this is a pretty big deal. ]
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 04:21:46PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Some people have reported problems with initrd on sparc64. I'm trying to
> > trace that problem (hard, because I can't rep
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:18:40PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Am I to understand that this is based on the new cd image with my
> > silo/kernel fixes?
>
> Probably since this ISO was built on 20040511.
>
> > If so, did you have p
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:18:40PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Am I to understand that this is based on the new cd image with my
> silo/kernel fixes?
Probably since this ISO was built on 20040511.
> If so, did you have problems booting the initrd
> before?
I got problem with beta 4 of the instal
On May 14, James Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's possible that there is a problem with kernel 2.6.3?
> Maybe pppoeconf or other ppp tools that adjust the routes table do
> that properly, but the kernel doesn't fix them up and make them
> active immediately?
No.
--
ciao, |
On May 14, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco, seems we've found a tester for your ppp udeb. Can you provide
> some help?
No, I do not maintain nor support pppoeconf, and by the time he runs it
ppp-udeb is obviously not needed anymore.
--
ciao, |
Marco | [6284 diyTn13iBB0PA]
> > > I got the same type of warnings between the boot of the CDROM kernel and
> > > the first stage of the installer.
> >
> > Let's ask debian-sparc about this. So apparently the system boots
> > fine, but those warnings are displayed. Can/should anything be done
> > about this?
Am I to unders
Your message dated Fri, 14 May 2004 17:37:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 16:53]:
> > > > I did not have any problem, only some warning during boot of the CDROM
> > > > about unimplemented SPARC instruction.
> > >
> > When I boot I still have these warning
There was a failure when using dselect to install console-common. The
exit status of the preconfigure for this package was 9.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
