Processed: severity of 242246 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 242246 important Bug#242246: debian install report Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Processed: reassign 242321 to xserver-xfree86

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 242321 xserver-xfree86 Bug#242321: debian-installer: Keyboard layout (de_CH) not used for generating XF86Config Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `xserver-

Processed: reassign 239552 to libdebian-installer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 239552 libdebian-installer Bug#239552: kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386: incompatibility with the cciss module ? Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `libdebian-insta

Re: Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 06:00:28PM -0700, Anthony Johnson wrote: > ICU's name list _is_ following ISO 3166, and so do > many other sources. What does that mean? These lists are different, and ICU has a much less controversial wording. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Processed: tagging 242246

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 242246 fixed Bug#242246: debian install report There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: reassign 242246 to libdebian-installer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 242246 libdebian-installer Bug#242246: debian install report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `libdebian-installer'. > End of message, stopping proces

Processed: retitle 242232 to undefined problem installing l lilo

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 242232 undefined problem installing l lilo Bug#242232: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Processed: tagging 242232

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 242232 moreinfo Bug#242232: Package: installation-reports There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: reassign 242232 to lilo-installer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 242232 lilo-installer Bug#242232: Package: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lilo-installer'. > End of message, stopping processi

Bug#242232: Package: installation-reports

paf wrote: > Comments/Problems: > Impossible tu use lilo!! I just manage to install grub. > So i reboot, it' ok, debian is installed. > I removed grub and install lilo, and i never reach to mounr root fs, i think it's > because i make it ext3?? > I reinstall and stay with grub. > > It' s the

Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?

Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm just a naïve gaijin[1], but I'm not sure you're right about that. > Written zh_CN and zh_TW look very similar to Western eyes. I've seen a > comparison of the two in some Sun documentation, and they really just > looked like the exact same glyphs

Re: Bug#242343: debian-installer beta 3 sparc netinst image failed to boot up on Ultra10

[CC:ing debian-sparc to notify the other interested parties.] On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:48:57 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Version: beta3 > Severity: grave Aha. That's a known broken version, sorry. debian-cd was using a bad silo.conf. See below for more details... >

Bug#224634: marked as done (discover loads ide-scsi module, which prevents apt from accessing some ide cdroms)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221983: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#221983: marked as done (ide-scsi problem again, with a solution: /dev/sr0 in fstab!)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221983: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#220936: marked as done (ide-scsi breaks use of CD after reboot)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220936: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#241840: marked as done (discover1 should conflict with libdiscover2)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#241840: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#220704: marked as done (ide-scsi stuff breaks apt for cdrom)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220704: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#214622: marked as done (Cut: command not found)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#214622: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#213866: marked as done (discover: extend manpage see-also section)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#213866: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#178944: marked as done (discover: depends on mounted /usr)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#178944: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#166460: marked as done (/etc/init.d/discover; if you're going to use sed...)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#166460: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#160658: marked as done (libdiscover-dev: SMP cpu detection doesn't work, error in code)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#160658: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#152604: marked as done (discover: linuxrc must have executable bits in initrd)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#152604: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#201695: marked as done (discover: problem with ide-scsi and devfs)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#201695: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#224528: marked as done (cdrom-detect: confused /dev/hdc /dev/sr0)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220704: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#238472: marked as done (discover should not load i810-tco module)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#238472: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#240308: marked as done (Discover: Spanish debconf translation)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#240308: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#241841: marked as done (discover1: Updated Danish debconf-po translation)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#241841: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Claus Färber) writes: > BTW, there are a lot of other names from ISO 3166 that IMO should be > changed for everyday use: > > Short name contains unnecessary parts from the full official name > (probably for political hyper-correctness): > > IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF;IR

Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?

On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:28:49PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > Given what I understand of the politics and history of Taiwan/China, I > think it is unlikely that the two use the same language *in every detail*. > Particularly, I doubt that their usage of technical language jargon is the > same.

discover1_1.5-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/disco

Processed: Processing discover1 bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 235107 wontfix Bug#235107: discover: Run only at install There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > tags 235579 wontfix Bug#235579: discover should be able to edit the module configuration There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > merge 23

Processing of discover1_1.5-8_i386.changes

discover1_1.5-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb Greeti

Bug#242343: debian-installer beta 3 sparc netinst image failed to boot up on Ultra10

Package: debian-installer Version: beta3 Severity: grave Hi, I tried to install sarge with debian-installer beta 3 netinst.iso and 2004-04-02 daily unstable snapshot netinst.iso on UltraSPARC Ultra10, but kernel was failed to boot up with the failure of root filesystem mount. Ultra10 setting:

Processing of debian-installer_20040405_i386.changes

debian-installer_20040405_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20040405.dsc debian-installer_20040405.tar.gz debian-installer-manual_20040405_i386.deb debian-installer-images_20040405_i386.tar.gz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Processed: Two more pending discover1 bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 220936 pending Bug#220936: ide-scsi breaks use of CD after reboot Tags were: d-i Tags added: pending > tags 220704 pending Bug#220704: ide-scsi stuff breaks apt for cdrom Tags were: d-i Bug#224528: cdrom-detect: confused /dev/hdc /dev/sr0 Tags add

Bug#242338: Debian-Installer is working

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-04-02 http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ uname -a: Linux debian-compaq 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-04-03 Method: Following directions at "beta 3 of the Debian-Installer" http://www.

Processed: Pending discover1 bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 241840 pending Bug#241840: discover1 should conflict with libdiscover2 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 166460 pending Bug#166460: /etc/init.d/discover; if you're going to use sed... There were no tags set. Tags added: pending >

Bug#204875: marked as done (discover: modprobe code broken for kernel 2.6)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Apr 2004 22:15:58 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This bug is closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Processed: Processing #237612 and #237603

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 237603 wontfix Bug#237603: My computer hangs when discover loads parport_pc and I don't have a parport Tags were: wontfix sid Bug#237612: kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac: parport_pc.o hangs my imac TFT 15" and tibook G4 Tags added: wontfix > mer

Processed: Processing #237612

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 237612 wontfix Bug#237612: kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac: parport_pc.o hangs my imac TFT 15" and tibook G4 Tags were: sid Bug#237603: My computer hangs when discover loads parport_pc and I don't have a parport Tags added: wontfix > quit Stoppi

partman (was Re: Removing unused d-i udebs from archive)

Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On 5.IV.2004 at 12:44 Joey Hess wrote: > > > > If we're in a string freeze, it's news to me. (Ahemm..) > > OK. Then today or tomorow I am commiting the changes. > > I supposed that I had to wait for a new branch in the repository just > like this happened with beta2 >

[no subject]

se ha detectado un virus en su correo Attachment file : your_archive.pif Virus name: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action taken : Unable to Clean... Attachment file : your_archive.pif Virus name: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Secondary Action taken : Deleted...

Processed: Processing #220616

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 220616 wontfix Bug#220616: ALSA modules and 'discover' package There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Processed: Processing #235578 and #229440

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 235578 wontfix Bug#235578: discover: fails to load several modules on 2.6, because of different names There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > tags 229440 wontfix Bug#229440: discover: not able to detect already loaded modules in 2.6 kernels

partconf_0.29_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partconf-find-partitions_0.29_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-find-partitions_0.29_i386.udeb partconf-mkfstab_0.29_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-mkfstab_0.29_i386.udeb partconf_0.29.dsc to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf_0.29.dsc partconf_0.29.tar.gz to pool

partitioner_0.24_mips.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partitioner_0.24.dsc to pool/main/p/partitioner/partitioner_0.24.dsc partitioner_0.24.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partitioner/partitioner_0.24.tar.gz partitioner_0.24_mips.udeb to pool/main/p/partitioner/partitioner_0.24_mips.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your cont

Processing of partitioner_0.24_mips.changes

partitioner_0.24_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partitioner_0.24.dsc partitioner_0.24.tar.gz partitioner_0.24_mips.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Processed: Processing #239414

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 239414 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#239414: /etc/init.d/discover not removed when package is removed There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bu

Bug#241817: install: does not create yaboot partition

On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 10:20:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 01:20:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > The idea is that some hardware configurations needs some particular > > > partitions to be there (like a prep boot partition or a palo boot > > > pa

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libdebian-installer 0.21

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 235617 + fixed Bug#235617: mapdevfs does not translate mylex raid drive names Tags were: moreinfo confirmed d-i Tags added: fixed > tag 239291 + fixed Bug#239291: FWD: Debian Installer and Compaq Smart Array Controller Tags were: confirmed moreinfo

Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?

Anthony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > certainly it is NOT a bug. Anyone with half a brain can see that. So how do you justify the brokenness of the Taiwan entry -- which unlike every other entry, doesn't properly yield the name of the country? Can you? [BTW, you included my entire messag

Re: More facts about the TW issue (was: Re: Must debian-installer use iso-codes package when choosing country?)

--- Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed, I found yesterday that the iso-3166 list and > FAQ gives incorrect reasons for giving TW this controversial name. it is correct. > > They mention that the name comes from the UN list of > "country, regions > and other areas for statistica

Fixed in NMU of libdebian-installer 0.21

tag 235617 + fixed tag 239291 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 18:49:56 -0400 Source: libdebian-installer Binary: libdebian-i

libdebian-installer_0.21_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21_i386.deb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21_i3

Re: Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]

ICU's name list _is_ following ISO 3166, and so do many other sources. This is another reason why it should be followed here. --- Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 05 April 2004 21:39, Denis Barbier wrote: > > Another source is t

Processing of libdebian-installer_0.21_i386.changes

libdebian-installer_0.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdebian-installer_0.21.dsc libdebian-installer_0.21.tar.gz libdebian-installer4_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-instal

Processing of partconf_0.29_i386.changes

partconf_0.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partconf_0.29.dsc partconf_0.29.tar.gz partconf-find-partitions_0.29_i386.udeb partconf-mkfstab_0.29_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: Changing the wording of countrychooser main question

> "Choose a country, territory or area:" How about just one of "Choose a territory:" or "Choose an area:" or "Choose a region:"? One size fits all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#239121: netcfg: Use default hostname from DHCP if one is received

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 05 April 2004 22:47, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > But in fact, the newest dhcp3-client package (and udeb) (3.0.1rc13-1) seems > to have a "more or less rewriten dhclient-script" and should now default to > anounce any non-empty hostname to the dhcp

Bug#238228: FTBFS: setgid DEBIAN directory

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:17:09PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: >On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> > >> >Matt, >> > >> >I can't find anything wrong with this package - it builds just fine >> >and the deb

Bug#238228: FTBFS: setgid DEBIAN directory

On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > > >Matt, > > > >I can't find anything wrong with this package - it builds just fine > >and the debian/ dir is not setgid in the .tar.gz. Can you check this > >again?

kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kbd-chooser_0.48.dsc to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.48.dsc kbd-chooser_0.48.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.48.tar.gz kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.udeb to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your cont

Bug#239385: marked as done (speakup keymap does not work in d-i)

Your message dated Mon, 05 Apr 2004 18:17:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#239385: fixed in console-data 2002.12.04dbs-35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#242321: debian-installer: Keyboard layout (de_CH) not used for generating XF86Config

Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n During installation, Debian installer asks about the keyboard layout to use. And that works fine. After installation, I really have that layout, but I always have to edit XF86Config-4 to replace "us" with my decision (which, in my case, is

Processing of kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.changes

kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kbd-chooser_0.48.dsc kbd-chooser_0.48.tar.gz kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

d-i: recreating MBR or boot floppy (rescue mode)

Hi! found the MBR overwriten by another OS. I thought I could test to recover with d-i, so I did. Installing grub or lilo needed to reenter the partition table, (which is ok) but I couldn't figure out how to write the MBR without newly installing the base-system. When selecting grub or lilo i

Processing of linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.57_m68k.changes

linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.57_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.57.dsc linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.57.tar.gz kernel-image-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ppp-modules-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68

Bug#237779: #237779: /etc/hosts is wrong (with dhcp)

Unfortunately I have to confirm this. But I think it might not be a netcfg issue but rather the duty of the dhcp-client to make sure the network config is consistent as long the connection is under their supervision, and reverted back to original state when stoping the dhcp-client. In my case

kernel-wedge_1.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kernel-wedge_1.4.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.4.dsc kernel-wedge_1.4.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.4.tar.gz kernel-wedge_1.4_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.4_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contr

Bug#239121: netcfg: Use default hostname from DHCP if one is received

I looked into this and around on the web. The observations I made where: The hostname and domain in DHCP can be treated in two ways, polling the hostname from the server or sending it so the DNS-server can be updated dynamically. It is ok to default the hostname to somthing like "debian" (or

Bug#242308: installation-reports (compaq presario 1201 + netgear ma401 wireless pcmcia)

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Image downloaded on 02 april 2004 from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso sarge-i386-netinst.iso 01-Apr-2004 14:07 102M md5sum : 0f07ec741ac6e46b58bab5ddff9b2942 unam

Processing of kernel-wedge_1.4_i386.changes

kernel-wedge_1.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kernel-wedge_1.4.dsc kernel-wedge_1.4.tar.gz kernel-wedge_1.4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 05 April 2004 21:39, Denis Barbier wrote: > Another source is the icu-data package; ICU stands for 'International > Components for Unicode' and is developed by IBM, see > http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/ > The English names for countries/re

Re: beta3 problems

Clint Adams wrote: > There still appears to be a problem installing to a machine with a cciss > card; mkinitrd will fail because the devfs name is not present on > /target/dev. This is fixed in libdebian-installer in subversion (probably, needs testing), but the upload of that package is blocked b

linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57_source+alpha.changes is NEW

brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb cdrom-m

beta3 problems

There still appears to be a problem installing to a machine with a cciss card; mkinitrd will fail because the devfs name is not present on /target/dev. Also, if one creates a device node or symlink with the devfs name, and attempts the base system installation again, it will fail because /target/u

Processing of linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57_source+alpha.changes

linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57_source+alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57.dsc linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57.tar.gz kernel-image-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb nic-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb nic-extra-modules-2.4.

Re: Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 08:02:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 05 April 2004 10:23, Christian Perrier wrote: > > If someone has a better standards organisation for this issue, please > > mention it. And, non, Microsoft is not the answer.:

Bug#225244: installation-reports: Install on Medion Titanium 8080XL (ATI 9800) incl. FritzCard DSL

Package: installation-reports Version: beta-3 Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT I tried beta 1, now I try beta 3! Only changes listed. Debian-installer-version: 2004-03-xx sarge-i386-netinst.iso (105MB,beta3) uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 E

Bug#240701: please close

Thanks for reasigning my bugreport to the right place that I and reportbug did not found. Please close this bug since #239121: netcfg: Use default hostname from DHCP if one is received was already filed 8 days earlier. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

Bug#242290: Sun Fire 280R

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: daily businesscard image from 2004/04/04 uname -a: n/a Date: 2004/04/05 Method: boot from businesscard image Machine: Sun Fire 280R Processor: UltraSparc III+ Memory: 2 GB Root Device: SCSI Root Size/partition table: n/a Output of lspci: n/a

Bug#231756: FQDN without dhcp confirmed

> The debian installer should have set your hostname to a fully qualified one, > so this should work. Please confirm. I tested this with d-i beta3, I can confirm it works for the non-dhcp case. /etc/hosts has a FQDN and the hostname as alias. Calling hostname --fqdn works ok. This bug can probab

Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 05 April 2004 10:23, Christian Perrier wrote: > If someone has a better standards organisation for this issue, please > mention it. And, non, Microsoft is not the answer.:-) Someone mentioned looking at leading map makers (I think he mention

editorial

Get the  low.est  pri.ce  for  gen.eric  medica.tions! Xa.n.ax  - only $100 Vi.cod.in  - only $99 Ci.al.is  - only $2 per  do.se Le.vit.ra  - only $73 Li.pit.or  - only $99 Pr.opec.ia  - only $79 Vi.ag.ra  - only $4 per  do.se Z.oco.r  - only $99 Your  Sav.ings 40% compared Average Internet Pr

Bug#241001: Mostly successful Mac m68k install - fstab/partitioning issues.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 01:32:12PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 10:27:24AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > Disk partitioning only offers /dev/sda; I have /dev/sdb as well > > which is where I actually wanted to install. Was able to used > > mac-fdisk from the shell

[l10n] 2nd-stage splits into 2nd and 3rd stage!

Hey fellows, first, sorry for being a bit late... As some of you may have noticed already, dpkg, apt and aptitude are missing in the 2nd-stage stats: I'd like to announce a 3rd-stage-status for translation-status. Christian Perrier and I decided to do this to draw a better line between much impo

Re: Debian installer for Apple XServe

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 07:03:51PM +0200, Pip Oomen wrote: > An initial test I performed today, with the nighlty from April 4th, > seems to find the harddisk OK. I'll look into further details/problems > tomorrow and report back with an installation report. Ok, cool. Friendly, Sven Luther --

Re: Removing unused d-i udebs from archive

On 5.IV.2004 at 12:44 Joey Hess wrote: > > If we're in a string freeze, it's news to me. (Ahemm..) OK. Then today or tomorow I am commiting the changes. I supposed that I had to wait for a new branch in the repository just like this happened with beta2 http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004

Re: Debian installer for Apple XServe

An initial test I performed today, with the nighlty from April 4th, seems to find the harddisk OK. I'll look into further details/problems tomorrow and report back with an installation report. Regards, Pepijn. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Re: About that Alpha kernel bug mentioned in beta3 errata

On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Herbert Xu wrote: > Bjoern Brill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The symlink gets created in drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c:register_cdrom(): > > > >if (pos >= 0) { > >char vname[16]; > >sprintf (vname, "cdrom%d", cdi->

Re: Removing unused d-i udebs from archive

Anton Zinoviev wrote: > There is also a problem with the numbering of the partitions (#238838, > #220990). I have fixed it in partman (though I am holding my commits > because of the string freeze). If we're in a string freeze, it's news to me. (Ahemm..) -- see shy jo signature.asc Descriptio

Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?

(crosspost removed. This discussion belongs to -boot where Debian Installer packages development is coordinated, including countrychooser. Quoting John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > The "standards body" in question is the UN, which has labeled the place > "Taiwan,neither a province of China" for

More facts about the TW issue (was: Re: Must debian-installer use iso-codes package when choosing country?)

Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Please have a look at KDE (run kcontrol, select 'Regional & accessibility', > then 'Country/Region & Language'), they use real short names: Macedonia > and Taiwan in these particular cases. > Their list looks much smarter than the UN one. Well, "smarte

Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?

Quoting Miles Bader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Province of China' is. It's the _only_ `editorial comment' in the > entire list (all other comma-separated entries are simple prefixes which Sure. ask the Israel government about their feelings for the "PS Palestinian Territory, occupied" entry.

linux-kernel-di-s390_0.57_s390.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kernel-image-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/kernel-image-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb kernel-image-2.4.25-1-s390-tape-di_0.57_s390.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/kernel-image-2.4.25-1-s390-tape-di_0.57_s390.udeb linux-kernel-di-s390_0

os-prober_0.02_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: os-prober_0.02.dsc to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.02.dsc os-prober_0.02.tar.gz to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.02.tar.gz os-prober_0.02_i386.udeb to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.02_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian

debian-installer_20040403_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: debian-installer-manual_20040403_i386.deb to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-manual_20040403_i386.deb debian-installer_20040403.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040403.dsc debian-installer_20040403.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-in

os-prober_0.01_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: os-prober_0.01.dsc to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.01.dsc os-prober_0.01.tar.gz to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.01.tar.gz os-prober_0.01_i386.udeb to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.01_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian

Re: partman-auto question: modifying recipes

On 5.IV.2004 at 15:56 Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > So virtual types like "palo" don't have to be added? I thought you'd > have to add them, too. Yes. partman-palo makes parted to think that palo partitions are linux-swap (an arbitrary choice). This is controlled in partman-palo/parted_names/pa

  1   2   >