On Tuesday 25 November 2003 15:50, you wrote:
> You have to build all the udebs manually and put them into
> build/localudebs. Even if you tell the build script to compile the
> udebs (debug versions will do that) it will download the sources
> from the archive and build those.
Hi,
I did manag
Bonjour, depuis plusieurs jours le lien vers la liste de paquets stables ne
fonctonne plus.
Amicalement, Patrice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, here is the second revision of iso-scan po file, bosnian translation.
Please commit,
Safir
iso-scan_cvs.bs.zip
Description: Zip compressed data
There goes the attachment this time (i hope).
Miguel
On Friday 21 November 2003 13:20, you wrote:
> * Miguel Figueiredo
>
> | I'm sendind you the file:
> | /debian-installer/tools/base-installer/debian/po/ pt.pot
>
> It seems like you forgot to attach the file. Also, it's better if you
> se
Jeffrey Barish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In every case, my machine gets to the point where it should boot from
> CD, but it goes past it and boots either from fd (if one is installed)
> or hd. The machine will boot from a knoppix CD, so the problem is not
> in my BIOS settings. Any suggestio
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Network configuration:[ ] none [ ] dhcp [ ] static [ ] modem/dsl
>
> This seems to imply that all dsl uses the abomination of pppoe. I've
Thats strange since the word doesn't eve
I am attempting to install sarge using the new debian installer
according the directions at
http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/INSTALLATION-HOWTO?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
Those directions describe how to install sarge using CDs made from a CD
image available at
htt
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Network configuration:[ ] none [ ] dhcp [ ] static [ ] modem/dsl
This seems to imply that all dsl uses the abomination of pppoe. I've
got SDSL at home, and would need to choose static if I was installing
on a directly connected
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Attached report from template.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux illuvatar 2.4.22-1-686 #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Package: installation-reports
INST
Barry C.Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 26, 2003, at 1:59 PM, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
>
> > * Barry C.Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-24 20:09]:
> > | List,
> > | Is there any timeframe on when Yaboot 1.3.11 will be incorporated
> > | into the daily snapshot of the installer?
On Nov 26, 2003, at 1:59 PM, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
* Barry C.Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-24 20:09]:
| List,
| Is there any timeframe on when Yaboot 1.3.11 will be incorporated
| into the daily snapshot of the installer? According to Ethan
Benson's
| announcement (see below) on [EMAIL
* Barry C.Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-24 20:09]:
| List,
| Is there any timeframe on when Yaboot 1.3.11 will be incorporated
| into the daily snapshot of the installer? According to Ethan Benson's
| announcement (see below) on [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's
| supposed to address i
List,
Is there any timeframe on when Yaboot 1.3.11 will be incorporated into
the daily snapshot of the installer? According to Ethan Benson's
announcement (see below) on [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's
supposed to address issues specific to the PowerMac G5 and the aluminum
PowerBook G4 series.
Thank
>[Geert Stappers]
>> Add missing serial line (detection) support to the list.
>
>Are you talking about the missing serial line support in
>grub-installer, or some feature of the grub boot loader? The first
>should be easily fixable. At least we use grub with serial console
>here at the university
tags 219528 + d-i
tags 219680 + d-i
tags 219890 + d-i
tags 219888 + d-i patch
thanks
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:53:40PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I use the d-i tag to list all d-i related bugs. For this to work, all
> such packages need the tag, including the d-i only packages. :)
Ok,
[Geert Stappers]
> Add missing serial line (detection) support to the list.
Are you talking about the missing serial line support in
grub-installer, or some feature of the grub boot loader? The first
should be easily fixable. At least we use grub with serial console
here at the university, and i
Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:22:07PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > Which architecture still uses kernel 2.2 with d-i? I thought that the
> > plan was to move all architectures to 2.4 for debian-installer.
> >
> > Because d-i uses devfs it is not tr
[Jeremie Koenig]
> I think i've read somewhere that the d-i tag wasn't supposed to be
> used on d-i only packages. This seems wrong. Should we tag all d-i
> bugs d-i when we sbumit them ?
I use the d-i tag to list all d-i related bugs. For this to work, all
such packages need the tag, including t
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joey Hess schrieb:
> > On 13 Dec 2000 I wrote:
> >
>
> >>James Troup wrote:
> >>
> >>>You can't have a .udeb with the same name as a .deb; this is enforced
> >>>by katie (i.e. the package will be REJECTed) at JoeyH's specific
> >>>request.
> >>
> >>B
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:22:07PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Which architecture still uses kernel 2.2 with d-i? I thought that the
> plan was to move all architectures to 2.4 for debian-installer.
>
> Because d-i uses devfs it is not trivial to support it on 2.2.
I don't know, I was just
I now realize this doesn't help, as some architectures still use linux
2.2, which doesn't have tmpfs. As a consequence we can't just use the
"tmpfs" name and use options that don't apply everywhere.
Which architecture still uses kernel 2.2 with d-i? I thought that the
plan was to move all archite
Joey Hess schrieb:
On 13 Dec 2000 I wrote:
James Troup wrote:
You can't have a .udeb with the same name as a .deb; this is enforced
by katie (i.e. the package will be REJECTed) at JoeyH's specific
request.
BTW my reasoning behind that is it could get confusing if someone
manages to install a ud
Package: installation-reports
Version: Debian Installer beta 1
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
downloaded on 2003-11-20
uname -a: N/A
Date: 2003-11-20
Method: CD
Machine: Intel ISP 2150G
Processor: 2 x PI
[Joey Hess]
> Please stop committing large changes to this very core part of d-i.
I agree to this. We need to be more conservative with the changes to
libd-i.
> These changes will not be accepted into the next beta. The core of
> d-i is frozen.
Some of the changes will have to be accepted. Get
tag 219528 - patch
thanks
(i hope i got it right, it's the first time i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it
ok to CC the bug report ?)
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 05:15:08AM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> I think the limit should be set manually (as documented in
> /usr/src/linux/Documentation/filesystems/tm
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:31:12PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> Ok, I'll look into these too. I'll test the new patch and send it
> tomorrow evening.
Well, this was more like 2 weeks, but here is a patch anyway. Can
someone have a look ? (to anna's changelog too, BTW, it looks weird.)
Changes:
Alastair McKinstry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The default keyboard is the same as it was for woody; whar is the best
> default keyboard for Dutch language users ?
Most people here "just" type US-qwerty. In fact, except for some people
who type dvorak, I only know US-qwerty typists here.
Some st
27 matches
Mail list logo
