> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> I think this project could do with some sort of "what on earth is
>> this?" introduction for people who know absolutely nothing about what
>> you're trying to do.
http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4485207&cid=45523195
ht
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:18:16AM +0000, luke.leighton wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:23:30PM +, luke.leighton wrote:
>> >
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:23:30PM +0000, luke.leighton wrote:
>> hoooray, hooray, finally we're on to a non-CE/non-FCC beta run. $75
>> plus tax & shipping via our 3rd party partners. specs at the link
>>
hoooray, hooray, finally we're on to a non-CE/non-FCC beta run. $75
plus tax & shipping via our 3rd party partners. specs at the link
below. anyone on debian-arm or fedora-arm who would like to order one
and would like a preorder code so as to be able to jump the first-come
first-served queue (i
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 11:09:59PM +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> this is all a rather round-about way to say that for those people who
>> heard and are thinking of heeding russell's call to "be s
ok, so the deadline's almost up but the discussions of the past two or
so days have basically i think everything that needs to be said, and
i'm extremely grateful to everyone who's contributed, privately and
publicly, especially on such short notice. i've passed it over to my
associates who will t
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Now that the discussion went off from "you stupid kernel developers
*lol*. i get that summary ["you said people were stupid!!!"] a lot.
i don't quite understand where it comes from, otherwise i would stop
doing it :)
> adopted DeviceTree wi
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Dennis Lan (dlan)
wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, June 8, 2013, luke.leighton wrote:
>>
>> right - too many people contributed to this, input from jon smirl,
>> wookie, maxime, tomasz, henrik, i've made a start here and will
>> con
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:26:49PM +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> maxime: we need to talk :)
>>
>> please tell me in 4 or 5 sentences what you've managed to do so far,
>> expanding a little on what thomas sa
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:02:03PM +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> well, tough. get me up to speed, *fast*.
>
> No, not unless you're willing to *pay* someone to spend time teaching you,
there's not
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> Maxime will reply to this in more details, but I believe the status is:
>
> * Interrupt controller is working.
> * Clock drivers are working.
> * Pinctrl is working.
> * GPIO is working.
> * Timer is working.
> * UART is working
> *
right - too many people contributed to this, input from jon smirl,
wookie, maxime, tomasz, henrik, i've made a start here and will
continue editing: this is notes for me to put forward an agenda for
discussion:
http://hands.com/~lkcl/allwinner_linux_proposal.txt
i'm setting a rule that each secti
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 19:26:49 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>
>> > Have you noticed that it is already the case in mainline?
>>
>> i knew there was a little bit, but not the extent of the commits.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Wookey wrote:
> OK, this sounds good. Could you say who the allwinner engineers are?
[cross-over: i asked him if he'd be happy to let me know privately,
so i have at least some context when speaking to the Directors]
> I
> guess it's quite a large organisation, s
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Luke,
>
> I want only one thing from you at this time. See below.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, luke.leighton
> wrote:
>> but the Directors of Allwinner aren't been kept in the loop,
>>
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>Seeing from your posts you don't have any knowledge on how Linux kernel
> development works
check back to 2004.
> and even on how Allwinner's cooperation with our
> community looks (and seem to be completely closed to our effort of showing
>
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 06 June 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> So yes, Allwinner has an evil vendor tree (c), with a solution similar yet
>> inferior (because not generic enough) to the device tree, but they show
>> interest on going down the mainline road
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> I should also add that Allwinner not only talked to us already,
oo! great! can you please [privately, not publicly] let me know who
that is, so i can let the Directors know, so that they can follow up?
> but also
> expressed interest in
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:13 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:54 PM, luke.leighton
>> wrote:
>>> augh. ok. solutions. what are the solutions here?
>>
>> Luke if you really wa
thomas i _very_ briefly spotted this when i was extremely busy
yesterday, and i'm grateful to the 2 or 3 people who've given me the
keywords and/or links to catch up.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> Dear Tomasz Figa,
>
> On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 02:01:14 +0200, Tomasz Figa w
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> On 07/06/2013 10:06, luke.leighton wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Vladimir Pantelic wrote:
>>> luke.leighton wrote:
>>>> 3 days remaining on the clock.
>>>
>>> what catas
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Vladimir Pantelic wrote:
> luke.leighton wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Vladimir Pantelic
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 4 days? WTF? since when did setting an ultimatum to the kernel
>>> community work?
>>
>&g
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> If companies are going to go off and invent the square wheel, and that
> makes *them* suffer the loss of being able to merge back into the
> mainline kernel, thereby making *their* job of moving forward with
> their kernel versions
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:49:38 luke.leighton wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Tomasz Figa
> wrote:
>> > Luke,
>> >
>> > On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:24:57 luke.leighton wrote:
>> &
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Vladimir Pantelic wrote:
> 4 days? WTF? since when did setting an ultimatum to the kernel
> community work?
i was only informed of the opportunity 2 days ago, vladimir. this is
an important meeting. of course the linux kernel community is
entirely free to:
* c
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Luke,
>
> On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:24:57 luke.leighton wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa
> wrote:
>> > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code
>>
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code to
> DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times already), as
> this is the only hardware description method supported by ARM Linux.
i repeat again: please s
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Henrik Nordström
wrote:
> tor 2013-06-06 klockan 00:54 +0100 skrev luke.leighton:
>
>> > Not really the case. Actually the opposite. DT have this as well, and
>> > integrated in device probing. Allwinner need to hack every driver use
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Henrik Nordström
wrote:
> conditions. I don't know what you really mean here, only that it's not
> "target market".
mass-volume tablet, mass-volume IPTV box. android OS, nothing else.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:40 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have a Cubieboard and I have a pca9532 on my desk. Now I want to
> attach this pca9532 to the Cubieboard so I wire them together on I2C.
>
> How is the Allwinner kernel going to load the driver for the pca9532?
> The mainline pca9532
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Henrik Nordström
wrote:
> tor 2013-06-06 klockan 00:26 +0100 skrev luke.leighton:
>
>> no john - they've only added it to the multiplexed sections of the
>> drivers which they themselves have written. such as
>> drivers/usb/sun{N}i_u
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:07 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:47 PM, luke.leighton wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Henrik Nordström
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> and then there's the boot0 and boot1 loaders, these *do* have
&
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Henrik Nordström
wrote:
>> and then there's the boot0 and boot1 loaders, these *do* have
> no, these are not tiny. boot0 is 24KB to fit the initial embedded SRAM
> (not cache), but boot1 is on pair with u-boot in size and runs from
> DRAM.
btw, please lis
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Henrik Nordström
wrote:
> ons 2013-06-05 klockan 22:15 +0100 skrev Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
>
>> what we do not want to happen is that they see upstream patches being
>> submitted, they merge them into their internal tree (which to date has
>> had zero upstrea
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Arnaud Patard
wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:48 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>>> > But the obvious answer here is to get support for your device into the
>>> > appropriate Debian k
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:48 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> > But the obvious answer here is to get support for your device into the
>> > appropriate Debian kernel flavour and then integrated into the standard
>>
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I don't know if the password thing is because ssh just doesn't let you
> use no password or if it's because the normal use case here is on
> regular Ethernet. In any case it doesn't seem like a blocker for a first
> pass and could likely be
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Patard
wrote:
> "luke.leighton" writes:
> Hi,
>
>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:18 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>>>> * create a modified netinst-initrd t
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:18 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> * create a modified netinst-initrd that uses usb0 ethernet gadget
>> *blind* (no console!!) which gets far enough on its own to do DHCP
>> client
>>
>>
i've started a page here which is the notes being collated to get this done:
http://rhombus-tech.net/allwinner_a10/debian_netboot/
l.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://li
i got debian/armhf up and running on the a10-eoma68 board, but i'd
like to make it easier for other people to install debian on it. the
generally-proven method "go download some whopping great 1gbyte random
image off the internet with packages preinstalled that you don't
actually want" is pretty s
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
> Note, I'm not qualified nor important or anything really to be part of
> this discussion or mud slinging this may turn into, but I do fine some
> flaws in the reasoning here that If not pointed out, may get grossly
> overlooked.
allo olive
http://lkcl.net/articles/odroid_u2_xrdp_5users.png
this is hilarious. above is a screen-shot of 5 instances of rdesktop
running on the little odroid-u2 on which xrdp and xfce have been
installed (size of the odroid-u2: 45mm square PCB). just a reminder:
the odroid-u2 is running with 2gb of RAM a
apologies folks, i thought i'd sent this out already. in the
interests of keeping it brief, let me link to other
discussions/invites:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2013-April/005792.html
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2013-April/007158.html
if interested, create (
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Peter Bauer wrote:
> Can you please ask if the offer different cases ?
i've passed on the request to them.
l.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archi
> You may also try https://github.com/ssvb/xf86-video-sunxifb
> Despite the poor choice of name, it should work with the ump based
> mali400 blobs also on the platforms other than sunxi.
yep, works perfectly well. i say perfectly: apparently you still
have to recompile the entire xorg server wit
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
> You may also try https://github.com/ssvb/xf86-video-sunxifb
> Despite the poor choice of name, it should work with the ump based
> mali400 blobs also on the platforms other than sunxi.
oh, awesome - i'll try that. i came across it and
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2013-April/007073.html
i've been contacted by mele of shenzen out-of-the-blue because it
turns out they really appreciated the fact that we used and
recommended their hardware with the allwinner a10 processor as a
low-cost developer system, it result
http://lkcl.net/reports/odroid-u2.html
this is an install report (successful one!) with full bootstrap
instructions on how to get from android to debian GNU/Linux (armhf
variant) on an ODroid-U2 device. it's got quirks (the hardware) but
the sheer tiny size for something that has 3 USBs and Ether
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 07:20:44PM +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> already on the CPU Card.
>
> Oh yeah. :)
>
>> ... unless converted. i'm dithering as to whether to add a TFP410
>> [1] onto the mini-en
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> I would just want something with an HDMI port.
already on the CPU Card.
> LCD has no interest at all.
... unless converted. i'm dithering as to whether to add a TFP410
[1] onto the mini-engineering board, to convert RGB/TTL into DVI
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:07:34AM +0000, luke.leighton wrote:
>> ok lennart, RS232 added. even with some level-shifters to put it up
>> to proper voltages and protect the CPU at the same time, how's that
>>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:51:13AM +0000, luke.leighton wrote:
>> http://rhombus-tech.net/freescale/iMX6/news/
> Well for a board to be interesting to me it has to have:
>
> SATA (which you have)
>
> Ethernet (wh
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 14, "luke.leighton" wrote:
>
>> which unfortunately doesn't help anyone who has a dreamplug which
>> comes shipped as standard with a 2.6.32 <= .35 kernel. especially on
> Not a sho
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Steev Klimaszewski
wrote:
> Adding in the accept4 syscalls isn't hard at all. They were added in
> 2.6.32, they just weren't wired up until 2.6.36 (for arm) - Eudev handles a
> kernel that doesn't have accept4, udev claims it needs something newer than
> 2.6.32,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Arnaud Patard
wrote:
> "luke.leighton" writes:
>
>> ok thanks marco. does anyone know what this is referring to? would
>> it be the accept4 syscall as shown in dmitri's patch:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
---
From: Marco d'Itri
Date: Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#648325: dreamplug breakage
To: "luke.leighton" , 648...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Joey Hess
On Feb 13, "luke.leighton" wrote:
> cut it, because even if they "solved" the problem by "
On 10/25/12, Muun Dahweed wrote:
> Hi again and thanks for writing.
> I got pretty busy and procrastinated to reply.
> Please forgive me.
eyy, nothing to forgive sah: this is the internet, you're allowed to
do whatever you feel!
>> the nice thing about this is that web server farms already re
58 matches
Mail list logo
