On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Vladimir Pantelic <vlado...@gmail.com> wrote: > luke.leighton wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Vladimir Pantelic <vlado...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> 4 days? WTF? since when did setting an ultimatum to the kernel >>> community work? >> >> >> i was only informed of the opportunity 2 days ago, vladimir. this is >> an important meeting. of course the linux kernel community is >> entirely free to: >> >> * completely ignore this opportunity >> * continue to complain that soc vendors do not follow their >> unilaterally-decided rules > > > SoC vendors are free to join the discussion, and many SoC vendors are part > of the kernel community, so calling this unilateral is plain wrong.
you're free to believe that, vladimir. i've explained why that hasn't happened, in prior messages. can we move forward, please? > >> 3 days remaining on the clock. > > > what catastrophic thing will happen when the time runs out? no catastrophe, vladimir: all that happens is that an opportunity is lost, and the result of that is that the situation remains as it is, with a major soc vendor being divorced from and isolated from the free software community, who will continue to have to shoulder the frustrating and isolated burden of responsibility of reworking "over-the-fence" kernel patches as best they can with the limited resources that they have. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/capweedxfwcv7hsduo6uc751iipg9ngdqc5ub7mbxwbespwf...@mail.gmail.com
