Re: quickstep back up

Op do, 27-01-2005 te 14:07 +0100, schreef Christian T. Steigies: > Moin, > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:39:30PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > It took way longer than I would've wanted, but I finally got where I > > should've been for a lng while

Re: quickstep back up

Op do, 27-01-2005 te 15:20 +0100, schreef Christian T. Steigies: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 02:28:01PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Does it work if you ignore the disk from AtariOS and partition it for > > Linux use only? You could then keep the 0.4GB SCSI disk to boot the >

Re: clock skew on m68k buildd?

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:18:00AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: > Is there a problem with the clock on the m68k buildd? Uh, "the"? There are eleven of them ;-) > I uploaded gworldclock 1.4.2 yesterday, and the m68k buildd reports: > > make[3]: Warning: File `rendezvous.c' has modification time 1.

Re: clock skew on m68k buildd?

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:21:09AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:11:21AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > > Christian: what kind of machine is chya? Are you running ntpdate from > > > cron? Is the nvram battery still good? > > Talking to me? That is not my b

Re: missing evolution-data-server build on m68k (zot)

On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:10:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hey folks, > > buildd.debian.org lists evolution-data-server as building on m68k since Mar > 16: > > gnome/evolution-data-server_1.0.4-1: Building by buildd_m68k-zot > [optional:out-of-date] > Previous state was Needs-Build

Re: trimming packages

Op za, 16-04-2005 te 17:40 -0700, schreef Rick Younie: > I think that we should move toward only building packages > that have some use for m68k, not just building packages to > show we can do it (eventually.) No, I disagree. First, it's very hard to tell what exactly 'some use' is; we can't hones

Re: m68k machines at debcamp

On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:59:17AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 01:53:10AM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: > > > We are looking to get some m68k machines sponsored for the debcamp for > > various > > development tasks. In order to have an idea which architecture

Re: CD-ROM mount failed

[Cc set to -boot, where the installer is being developed, because I'm afraid not many people on -68k will know how to help you out with the installer problems. -boot: Petr Stehlik is an ARAnyM upstream developer] On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:00:03PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Hi there, > > I have

Re: 2.6.x-amiga kernel + misc.

On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:04:44PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Should I try to ensure that the 2.6-kernel is built with gcc-2.95? is it > > even possible to build 2.6.x with gcc-2.95? (I could try, but each kernel > > build is taking about half a day...) > > IIRC I built 2.6 with gc

Re: 2.6.x-amiga kernel + misc.

On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:54:16AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:06:07AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:04:44PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > > Should I try to ensure that the 2.6-kernel is built with

Re: get source

[This mail does not belong m68k-build, which is a mailinglist for coordination of autobuilding m68k packages; Cc and Mail-Followup-To set. Please respect them] On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:17:57PM -0400, Gu, John A. (US SSA) wrote: > Hi Friend, > > I am looking for a Linux that can be loaded into o

Re: Release Notes - What kernel versions are supported?

[Cc set to m68k-build, which is the m68k porters' mailinglist, as opposed to the m68k users' mailinglist on lists.debian.org] On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:24:25PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > I am working on the Sarge Release Notes and would like some info on the > kernel versions available for m68k su

Re: Release Notes - What kernel versions are supported?

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:43:29AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, 24 May 2005, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > For 2.6.8, all of the above plus HP9000 and Sun3 machines. > > Sun3x, I assume? I suppose. I thought it was Sun3,

Re: Release Notes - What kernel versions are supported?

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:27:54PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2005 10:33, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > If I'm not mistaken (and I'm sure Stephen or Christian will correct me > > if I am), it's as follows: for mac, 2.2; for everything else, 2.4. The &g

Re: Unable to boot Woody on Amiga

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:39:53PM -0700, R.P.Donoghue wrote: > Installs OK - no obvious errors or missing parts (follows the exact > script described in the installation guides). Reboot amiga (by > allowing the installer to reboot the machine). Then open a text > editor and write the boot file.

Re: Unable to boot Woody on Amiga

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:47:00AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > amiboot-5.6 -k c:\linux\linux.bin root=/dev/hdb1 ro > > - AmigaOS uses forward slashes, not backslahses > - C: is not what you think it is ;-) Okay

Re: Installieren von Linux auf Amiga

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 01:25:27PM +0100, Franziskus Meier wrote: > Hi, > > i tried to install Debian 3.0 Release 2/5 on my reactivitated Amiga 2000. > > The System hangs after/at the initialization of busy-box with repeating > message: > > blog: don't know screen type 1 This was a known issu

Re: how to install without d-i

On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 04:28:09PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Hi, > > I've spent last 26 hours by installing sarge on aranym. I cannot > overcome the d-i's partitioner. Well, once I managed to partition, > format and mount the disk on /target manually in the 2nd console but it > worked only for

Re: Help

On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 06:26:10PM -0400, Mark Duckworth wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'd like to help in any possible way I can with testing, porting, etc. > I have 2 Atari TT030's, a Nova Mach64 video card on one, a Falcon030 > with a CT60 and 80MHz 060, and 2 good installations of ARAnyM on fast > ha

Re: Help

On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:59:36AM -0400, Mark Duckworth wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:42 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 06:26:10PM -0400, Mark Duckworth wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > I'd like to help in any poss

Re: linux-image-2.6.12 (previously know as kernel-image)

On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:46:26PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Hi, > I have built some 2.6.12 image for m68k, I hope some people would like to > try them: > http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/linux-image/ Doesn't work on my MVME167. But that's no surprise, I haven't been able to b

Re: linux-image-2.6.12 (previously know as kernel-image)

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:24:13AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:46:26PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I have built some 2.6.12 image for m68

Re: how to install without d-i

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:18:12PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Wouter Verhelst píše v Po 08. 08. 2005 v 13:15 +0200: > > > > * Install woody, upgrade > > > > > > that's an interesting idea. > > > > Well, no, actually. It'll take way too

Re: internal compiler error on m68k with dcmtk packages

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:24:18PM +0200, Juergen Salk wrote: > > /usr/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/ostream.tcc:127: > > internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > > http://buildd.debian.org/

Re: how to install without d-i

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:11:26AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:18:12PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > > > Wouter Verhelst píše v Po 08. 08. 2005 v 13:15 +0200: > > > >

Re: xdm will not open display

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:29:41AM -0500, Lance Tagliapietra wrote: [X failing to work] > If I run X by iteself, as root: X -ac, for example, I will get an X > display and X cursor, but no log in window. Ah, so then your X setup does actually work; something must be wrong with xdm. If you try to

Re: how to install without d-i

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:35:26PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Wouter Verhelst píše v St 10. 08. 2005 v 23:46 +0200: > > Yes. Just boot the system in single-user mode and run the > > /native-install manually. It might have to be ran twice; if so, it'll > > tell you

Re: linux-image-2.6.12 (previously know as kernel-image)

On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:46:26PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Hi, > I have built some 2.6.12 image for m68k, I hope some people would like to > try them: > http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/linux-image/ I've tried them on quickstep, my Centris 650. It hangs while initializing th

Re: gutenbrowser trigger ICE on m68k - known issue?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:17:57AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > When compiling gutenbrowser on m68k for debian, it triggered an > internal compiler error. Is the issue on > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gutenbrowser> a known > issue? gcc-4.0 on m68k triggers many ICEs currently

Re: Instal failiures on a Macintosh LC475

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 06:55:22AM -0700, Yan Seiner wrote: > I have been trying unsuccessfully to install Debian sarge and now debian > testing on my old LC475. > > The install goes well until it gets to the partitioning. Using the > sarge installer, partman hangs at 72%. Hmm, that shouldn't

Re: Instal failiures on a Macintosh LC475

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:04:53AM -0700, Yan Seiner wrote: > Yan Seiner wrote: > >I have been trying unsuccessfully to install Debian sarge and now > >debian testing on my old LC475. > > > One other data point When it is booting, it comes up with a message > similar to can't mount devfs on

Re: Instal failiures on a Macintosh LC475

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:10:35PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 06:55:22AM -0700, Yan Seiner wrote: > > > > Using the testing installer, it crashes with can't get a

Re: Instal failiures on a Macintosh LC475

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:54:22PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:33:01PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > I was talking about joeyh's recent userdevfs changes that I w

Re: Instal failiures on a Macintosh LC475

On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:03:56PM -0700, Yan Seiner wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > >On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:59:44AM -0700, Yan Seiner wrote: > > > >>Partman never lets me create any partitions. It chokes on "Detecting > >>file systems" or something similar. It hangs; I can ping the m

Re: m68k packages lagging -- manual uploads?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:56:01PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > But then, wasn't m68k reduced to second class recently? no -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: How to trigger new build attempt on m68k?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:47:58PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > If the build tree on a400 has not been deleted yet, I would suggest starting > by compiling just the file that failed, to save a few hours of CPU time. And > maybe you can try compiling with -O2. Most fails I've seen were with

Re: Status of partimage for m68k

On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:03:16PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi all, > > while looking for the buildd status of partimage on > http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=partimage > I found that s390 and m68k list partimage as "not for us". While there > has been an NMU of partimage b

Re: Please remove bogus dep-wait on hplip

On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:44:05PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Please kindly fix the m68k hplip wanna-build entry. There is a weird > dep-wait installed for it on the m68k buildd. Done. It said "libqt3c102-mt"; I assume that's been transitioned already? -- The amount of time bet

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:47:08PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Sep 23, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE > > > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We

Re: Please ignore libcrypto++5.2.1c2-6

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:55:43AM +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > libcrypto++5.2.1c2-6 is in needs-build state, but I am pretty sure it > won't build cleanly, since it didn't on other architectures using GCC > 3.4, so please remove it from the build queue. Sorry, I see that libcrypto++ previou

Re: Why is libwxgtk2.6 not build on m68k

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 07:12:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > > My package poedit FTBFS on m68k as one of its deps (libwxgtk2.6-dev) is > not installable on m68k. It appears that wxwidgets2.6 is not build on > m68k... It's still in needs-bu

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:38:30PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > In linux.debian.devel.release Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting > >ICE b

Re: Please ignore libcrypto++5.2.1c2-6

On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:59:05PM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:18:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > > I see that libcrypto++ previously failed to build with an internal > > compiler error. Did you try to build it with GCC 3.4 fo

Re: FWD: Mozart FTBFS on m68k (Bug#330635)

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:09:37AM +0200, Kevin Glynn wrote: Content-Description: message body text > Actually, before we do that. I have just noticed that the failing > build is from Aug 30th (I assumed it had been retried recently). I > believe m68k has been having trouble with gcc. If that is n

Re: m68k: being ignored for testing propagation

On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:37:05AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > . . . > > From > > , there are > > 125 packages in state Failed, 138 in state Dep-Wait, and 45 that are > > Maybe-Faile

Re: no luck with parted

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:06:48PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Guys (I'm CC'ing debian-m68k), > > this is getting worse than just segfaulting subversion. > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include -D_REENTRANT > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" > -DL

Re: Status of d-i kernel transition for 2.6.14

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:05:33PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > arch udebbuild/config base-installer debian-cd > > --- - --- > > m68k 2.4.27/(2.6.12-1) 2.4.272.4.27 >

Re: Mac 840AV, was Re: Status of d-i kernel transition for 2.6.14

tent trouble > with the 840AV if you did acquire one. Neglecting ADB, the 650 isn't in > bad shape by comparison. (BTW, I found an old post from Wouter Verhelst > that comfirms that his mac is Centris 650.) Well, my first working mac was/is quickstep, a Centris 650. However, I've

Re: torcs m68k FTBFS - machine access

On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 09:38:33PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 09:11:23PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > > > So, I'm writing to you since I'd like to have access to a m68k machine > > or help from one who does in order to properly fix this issue. > > Just to be clear: a

Re: please upload boost 1.33.0-6 package

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 10:31:37AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > hi, > > could please anybody upload boost 1.33.0-6? it has been built on > m68k/vivaldi but it still needs to be uploaded. Vivaldi's had issues with its connectivity the last few days. It's successfully been uploaded in the me

Re: LINUX EM HP SERIE 9000 (Translation)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 06:00:01PM +0100, Kars de Jong wrote: > On di, 2005-12-27 at 09:59 -0600, David D. Kilzer wrote: > > On Dec 27, 2005, at 9:09 AM, Leonardo Silva Amaral wrote: > > > > >> Sirs; > > >> Im like to know if exist some Linux for HP 9000 server, as exist to > > >> Sun Ultra 5 an 1

Bug#340563: Optimizer bug, presumably.

Hi, My previous attempt wasn't of much help, I presume ;-) I redid a few things with a fresh head today; I had a look at the code as it occurs with -O2, and ran it one opcode at a time in the problematic function, checkXmlEqual. I found the following: The function checkXmlEqual seems to be opti

Re: Bug#340563: Optimizer bug, presumably.

On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:37:37PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Wouter, > > Thanks very much for your help on this bug! > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:58:10PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > My previous attempt wasn't of much help, I presume ;-) > >

Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future.

Hi, On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:21:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:17:48PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Yes, 'm68k' and 'future' in one sentence. Amazing, isn't it? Surely we > > must be joking? > > Hey, I

Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:09:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:21:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:17:48PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Yes, 'm68k' and 'future' in one sentence

Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:38:02PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:09:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Additionally, Ingo told me when the mail about that meeting had come out > > that he'd already tried such a setup in the past (I didn

Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future.

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:42:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:09:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:21:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:17:48PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >

Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future.

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:24:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:04:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > The point of my previous mail was to demonstrate that I am, in fact, > > trying to be proactive about getting the qualification done. > > The

Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future.

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:35:58PM +0100, Daniel Widenfalk wrote: > Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:24:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > >>On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:04:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >> > >>The fact you don&

Re: Installing Sarge (3.1r1) on Amiga

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:15:23PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:32:55PM -0500, Peter Krummrich wrote: > > > Later on in the installation process, the installer complained several > > > times > > > that it was not ab

Re: Installing Sarge (3.1r1) on Amiga

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:20:19PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > a few simple questions. IMHO, it would be better, it if allowed you a static > configuration even if DHCP is present on your network, It does, but you need to go into expert mode to do that (or press 'esc' while the DHCP conf

Re: Make menuconfig and libncurses-dev

On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 11:34:33PM -0500, Peter Krummrich wrote: > According to the help / module description of the kernel source, I need to > install libncurses-dev and tk-dev. However, I did not find these packages > in the aptitude list of available packages (list from the Sarge CD set > 3.1r1)

Re: eMule/ed2K/eDonkey client on m68k

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:54:19AM +0300, nzabrod wrote: > Hello there ! > Anyone got WORKING eMule/ed2K client on m68k ? > Any experience ? > I need a console one or with WEB-interface. No x-window. I've been told that eMule etc is just another name for the napster protocol; if that's correct,

Re: [D-I] Please update your packages for Beta2 release

On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 06:56:46PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 09:08:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > - vmelilo-installer has minor changes and a lot of translation updates; > > these should be checked and uploaded > > Wouter: are you game? I can upload, but I can't

Re: Assembler error message when compiling kernel source

On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 06:31:04PM -0500, Peter Krummrich wrote: > Hi, > > when trying to compile the kernel source, the assembler complained with an > error message. Here is what I did: > > - install kernel-source-2.4.27 package from Sarge (3.1r1) CD set, > - install and apply kernel-patches for

Re: [D-I] Please update your packages for Beta2 release

On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:41:42PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 30 January 2006 13:03, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 09:08:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > > > - vmelilo-installer has minor changes and a lot of translation > updates; > &

Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:20:10AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > OK, thank you! (Cool, I didn't know you could put 512 MB on a 68k > machine.) 68k has 4G address space, so why not? ;-) -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/

Re: D-I Beta2 - Status update

On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:34:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > If these issues are not resolved before Beta2 is ready, this will probably > mean hppa and/or m68k cannot be included in the release. You're talking about the Beta2 release here, right? As in, there's still going to be a possibility to

Re: out of memory with 2.6.15

On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:33:35AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:59:27PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote: > > > > My guess would be that your nubus card is handled by mac8390. The > > onboard ethernet would be macsonic. I suspect they are both builtin, > > but it's hard

Re: old_browser + ftp

On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 09:30:27AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 03:25:31AM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote: > > > Since on the mac 68k I can use -_ only _? - the old_brower of netscape > > -like - release 1.0, and because of the limit of this brower release - > > he can pr

Re: ncr5380/mac

On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:30:13PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote: > The mac_scsi driver always had a bug where multiple devices being > used at the same time on one bus could fail due to reselection > timeout. I don't remember that bug being permanently fixed. The > error message you included looked very

Re: ncr5380/mac

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:53:11AM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote: > I try mac53c9x=-1,0 but box is not happy, > > Since ncr5380 is a _generic_ controller > and the chip on board is AH8662c4 -not a NCR 53c96 - > there is other command line option ? Not sure then. I replied because Brad seemed to be

Re: debian-installer beta 2

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:36:14AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > debian-installer beta 2 has been released. The good news is that > m68k did make the beta 2 release. The bad news is we need some > real testing. [...] > In particular I'd like to know the following. Do any of the vme's > work?

Re: debian-installer beta 2

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 03:27:32PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:31:53PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:36:14AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > debian-installer beta 2 has been released. The good news is that &

Re: More RAM - a bad trend for m68k debian

On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:53:27AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I am a little nervous about the ColdFire boards, though, the ones we > received only have 64MB and no easy way of adding more memory. Yeah, but those have the advantage that they're actually still in development; I fully expe

Re: More RAM - a bad trend for m68k debian

On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:51:19AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > The partitioner also sets up fstab and such and it's already a hog by > the time it's loaded up (bear in mind, we're talking about a hog by > lowmem standards). Yes, it'd be nice to have a workaround, but I don't > know that anyon

Re: More RAM - a bad trend for m68k debian

On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:40:18AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 06:22:28PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:51:19AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > The partitioner also sets up fstab and such and it's already

Re: More RAM - a bad trend for m68k debian

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:57:58AM +0100, Christian Brandt wrote: > Wouter Verhelst schrieb: > >after all, for an installation on most m68k hardware, you need > >to (or can) do the formatting on the native OS anyway. > > Are talking about partitionising or creating a filesy

Re: 2.4 vs 2.6 kernels

On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:30:41PM +0400, nzabrod wrote: > Hello ! > I'm using Sarge release for now. > And I'm planning to move to 2.6 kernel (I have 2.4 for now). You can try that, but there's no guarantee it'll work; it all depends on your hardware. > Should I expect some performance boost in

Re: 2.4 vs 2.6 kernels

On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 06:10:30PM +0400, nzabrod wrote: > Oh, well, and second question. > Does kernel compilation procedure on m68k machine differs from any > other debian machine ? Certainly not by much. Be sure to use the debian kernel source, not the vanilla kernel source, though, because the

Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:05:54PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > dropping the bugreport from this CC. > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:50:15PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > > > I believe 3D on m68k is rather useless nowadays, but if someone > > > > knows better than me, please shout now! :-

Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:16:50PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:36:49PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > It looks like the concensus is that right now there's no real point > > in building openal and friends on m68k. > > > > I've marked openal not-for-us and I'll

Re: woody on a Macintosh Quadra 700: "Setting the System Clock using the Hardware Clock as reference..."

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:07:24AM +0200, Alex Teclo wrote: > I am trying to install/use Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 woody on a Macintosh > Quadra 700 > > I have tried installing Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 sarge, but there were two > problems: > 1) There is only 20 MB of RAM on the machine (although sarge sho

Re: Debian on a Macintosh Quadra 700

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Alex Teclo wrote: > 2) I'd like to upgrade to a 2.4.x or 2.6.x kernel. One of the reasons > is I'd like to use ext3 filesystems. But, on the Debian m68k CD, > there's no 2.4.x or 2.6.x kernel for the Macintosh (but for Amiga and > Atari, there is). Where

Re: Debian on a Macintosh Quadra 700

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:20:27PM +0200, Alex Teclo wrote: > 2006/4/24, Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Alex Teclo wrote: > > > > > > 2) I'd like to upgrade to a 2.4.x or 2.6.x kernel. One of the reasons > > > is I'd like to use ext3 filesys

Re: Coldfire Linux

[ColdFire development is really going on in the debian-coldfire alioth project, not (yet) here. Cc set accordingly] On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:20:37AM -0400, Mark Duckworth wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'm trying to bootstrap linux on my coldfire (Logic M584litekit eval > board). > > So far I have the

Re: booting 2.6.16-20060414 on my Macintosh Quadra 700

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:47:17PM +0200, Eugen Paiuc wrote: > Alex Teclo wrote: > >... any help would be appreciated. > > you need intrd22.gz from > http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/images-m68k/daily/netboot/ Err, no. initrd22.gz is meant for 2.2 kernels (hence the 22 in the name). Current

Re: booting 2.6.16-20060414 on my Macintosh Quadra 700

On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 06:12:22PM +0200, Alex Teclo wrote: > 2006/5/18, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >Alex: I'm afraid that, at this point, many macs just don't run anything > >more recent than 2.2 yet. If you want it fixed, you'll either have to >

Re: Please requeue schroot

On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:47:14AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Now #340871 is fixed and the latest glibc built on m68k, please could > you requeue schroot for building? It's currently Failed, but the > failure should now be fixed. Done. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ash

Re: Creation of #debian-68k on irc.debian.org (OFTC)

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:33:50AM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > we still need kernels 2.2 and 2.4 for m68k: kernel 2.6 works well on > my Quadra950 Oh? It doesn't on mine. Can you point me towards a working kernel image? -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate

Re: Creation of #debian-68k on irc.debian.org (OFTC)

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:34:10PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:15:04PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:33:50AM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > > > we still need kernels 2.2 and 2.4 for m68k: kernel 2.6 works well on

[buildd] old building

[x-post between -68k and m68k-build, with [buildd] tag in subject...] Hi, Unstable is back to 12 needs-build now, which makes it appear as though our backlog is almost cleared. Unfortunately, that's not true -- there's 86 packages in Building, and 92 in dep-wait. So that we don't get buildd's ru

Re: Problems with unpopulated SCSI host on Apple G4 Dualie (mirror front)

On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:37:32AM -0500, James Stallings II wrote: > Hello List! > > I'm having some issues with my Mac and 3.1r2 Sarge Since your mac is a PowerPC-based mac, it won't work with Debian/m68k, which can be used on m68k-based macintoshes only, i.e., those made before 1995 or so. I

[buildd] configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

Hi, Anyone seen one of those error messages before from autoconf? I've been seeing them on some of my buildd, not sure where they're coming from yet. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: [buildd] help with gmp

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:17:16PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I've successfully built gmp with -O0 and adding /usr/lib/libc.so to the > $libs in libtool to resolve the linker error. It passed all of its > self-tests, which seem extensive. > > Should I upload gmp or just use it to try to bui

Re: [buildd] help with gmp

On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:59:50AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:15:07AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:17:16PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Should I upload gmp or just use it to try to build the latest gcc-4.1

Re: glibc build failure

On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:24:19AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > I'm not sure if it's a problem with the build (the same sources have > > previously built successfully on m68k). I suspect a binutils > > regression. > > What version of binutils were yo

[buildd] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mysql-dfsg-4.1/stable-security build]

Hi, Now we forward the other way around ;-) - Forwarded message from Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.

[buildd] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mozilla failure]

and another one. - Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 09:42:31 +0200 From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [buildd] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mozilla failure]

On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:38:34PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > and another one. > > I forwarded this one three days ago. ;-) Whoops. Missed that one, sorry. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine,

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >