On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:59:50AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:15:07AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:17:16PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Should I upload gmp or just use it to try to build the latest gcc-4.1? > > > > Perhaps do that, and then see whether using gcc-4.1 to build it again > > works without any of those hacks? If it doesn't, you can still upload > > it; but if it does, then you have a less ugly build at least. > > Looking over the dep-wait situation, I think I'm tempted to go ahead and > upload gmp, then do a binNMU of it later if the new gcc can built it > straight up. At least twelve packages are directly dep-waited on gmp and > at least that many more are indirectly blocked.
Whoa, didn't realize that. That makes my suggestion a bit less interesting, indeed. > Any objections? None at all from my end. If you've been able to build it, and there is a test suite, it should Just Work(tm). -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
