On 12/06/2012 10:05 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Note3: and for those that want to know the real power of their new m68k
machine, I've added in attachement bogomips.c to compute the bogomips
and the equivalent 040 cpu frequency. Mine (on a Q6600 a 2.4 Ghz) is:
$ ./bogomips
Clocking: 132
BogoMi
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> I think it should be a good idea to play with the linux-user mode of
> qemu. Used with the linux containers, you can run real m68k users binary
> on an x86 kernel (it means gigabytes of memory, several CPU cores,
> Terabytes of SATA disks, gigabits e
Hi Thorsten,
Le jeudi 06 décembre 2012 à 20:56 +, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> Laurent Vivier dixit:
>
> >I think it should be a good idea to play with the linux-user mode of
> >qemu.
>
> Does that emulate an MMU? The system mode doesn’t, IIRC.
MMU is useless in usermode emulation.
> >qemu
Laurent Vivier dixit:
>I think it should be a good idea to play with the linux-user mode of
>qemu.
Does that emulate an MMU? The system mode doesn’t, IIRC.
>qemu linux-user mode traps guest (m68k) syscalls to translate them to
>native ones. It's not perfect.
Well right. It also doesn’t catch ge
elp you to test this. This script :
- checks all needed stuffs are there (I'm not sure of the full list)
- clones my qemu-m68k fork and compiles it
- debootstrap and configures an etch-m68k root filesystem
- configure binfmt to use qemu-m68k to load m68k ELF binaries
- creates an LXC container
Hello,
The qemu-m68k approach works fine at least with sarge, but with
etch-m68k qemu-m68k cannot handle some syscalls...
This is how I revived my amiga; first debootstrapping sarge on i386
(second stage and tinkering using qemu), cross-compiling the latest
kernel, installing amigaos with
Hi,
if you want to test your upgrade process, I think it would be nice to
work in a chroot... and with qemu you can do that. It is not as mature
as aranym, but it is nice to play with it.
How to do ? Follow this:
create an etch-m68k system under /m68k using something like
sudo debootstrap
Hi!
I'm in the progress of upgrading my Amigas from etch-m68k to unstable from
debian-ports.org. With the great help from Thorsten Glaser I wrote up some kind
of How-To on:
http://blog.windfluechter.net/content/blog/2011/07/26/1189-upgrading-m68k-etch-m68k-unstable
Please feel fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/31/2011 2:55 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thank you for this complete answer.
>
> I found the ISO here:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/cds/daily/debian-etch-m68k-m68k-netinst.iso
>
>
Hi,
thank you for this complete answer.
I found the ISO here:
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/cds/daily/debian-etch-m68k-m68k-netinst.iso
and did a bootable one here:
http://vivierlaurent.free.fr/Debian_etch-m68k_netinst.iso
It seems as I add a file inside, the "check CDROM&
of building
one based on 2.6.32-30 which includes a lot less “feature” patches.
This one’s the one from etch-m68k:
http://archive.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.18-4-mac_2.6.18.dfsg.1-12_m68k.deb
Finally, there’s kernel images on this site (e.g. 2.6.26-1):
http://snapshot.debian.
Hi guys,
I've broken my debian installation on my Quadra 800 and I have to
re-install it.
I've an old bootable netinst CD, but it's a sarge [1]·
Where can I find an etch-m68k (or sid) netinst CD ISO ?
Where can I find an up-to-date kernel .deb for macintosh architecture ?
Regar
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Stephen R. Marenka wrote:
>
> On Sun, November 29, 2009 6:59 pm, fth...@telegraphics.com.au wrote:
>
> > That's why I'm interested in etch-m68k (glibc-2.3.6) buildds. I don't
> > see any role for glibc-2.5 in the process of updating
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:32:20 -0600 (CST), "Stephen R. Marenka"
wrote:
> The other problem with etch-m68k is that we can't make changes to that
> distribution any more. It sounds like we should bootstrap sid's
toolchain
> (and friends) starting with etch-m68k.
Erm
On Sun, November 29, 2009 6:59 pm, fth...@telegraphics.com.au wrote:
> That's why I'm interested in etch-m68k (glibc-2.3.6) buildds. I don't see
> any role for glibc-2.5 in the process of updating to a tool chain based on
> eglibc-2.10, binutils-2.19.51, gcc-4.4.1, linu
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Stephen R. Marenka wrote:
>
> On Sat, November 28, 2009 7:12 pm, fth...@telegraphics.com.au wrote:
>
> > There are some packages that I'd like to see built under etch-m68k.
> > From the gcc-4.2 build failures that Stephen showed us, I have my
On Sat, November 28, 2009 7:12 pm, fth...@telegraphics.com.au wrote:
> There are some packages that I'd like to see built under etch-m68k. From
> the gcc-4.2 build failures that Stephen showed us, I have my doubts about
> packages in the testing/unstable suites.
>
> I
ake much sense to keep the machines
> running, until some issues are solved?
>
There are some packages that I'd like to see built under etch-m68k. From
the gcc-4.2 build failures that Stephen showed us, I have my doubts about
packages in the testing/unstable suites.
I'd like to see
On Fri, November 27, 2009 10:46 am, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:10:49AM -0600, Stephen R. Marenka wrote:
>> On Fri, November 27, 2009 3:12 am, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
>> > On a sidenote it seems that Arrakis and Spice aren't building packages
>> > anymore. Are they still
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:10:49AM -0600, Stephen R. Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, November 27, 2009 3:12 am, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> > On a sidenote it seems that Arrakis and Spice aren't building packages
> > anymore. Are they still needed?
> Sid is broken last I checked. I haven't really seen a gr
On Fri, November 27, 2009 3:12 am, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I'm still operating 3 m68k buildds and would like to update them.
> Currently sources.list points to etch-m68k which is, uhm, fairly old and
> outdated, I believe.
> Is there anything newer? Would it
Heya!
I'm still operating 3 m68k buildds and would like to update them.
Currently sources.list points to etch-m68k which is, uhm, fairly old and
outdated, I believe.
Is there anything newer? Would it make sense to switch to
ftp://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/pool-m68k/ - or to say it differ
It looks like the tex* packages are now using a dpkg trigger new to
lenny, which leaves the chroot in a mess.
Combine that with the python Breaks breakage and the etch-m68k
buildds are certainly looking old.
Anyway, I put together the minimal requirements of lenny packages
needed to get apt
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 06:00:17PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hey,
>
> as I was unable to find any etch-m68k uploads done after June 2008, I
> just disabled that suite on ftp.debian.org. The suite will stay around
> on ftp-master and the mirrors as long as regular etch do
Hey,
as I was unable to find any etch-m68k uploads done after June 2008, I
just disabled that suite on ftp.debian.org. The suite will stay around
on ftp-master and the mirrors as long as regular etch does, and will be
archived together with it on archive.debian.org, but no changes
(uploads) are
Le 16 juin 08 à 07:39, Eugen Paiuc a écrit :
Hi Laurent,
Hi Eugen,
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3_m68k.deb
Thank you for the link.
In fact the one I needed is:
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/libssl0.9.8_0.9.8c-4etch3_m68k.deb
Regards,
Laurent
-
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 07:39:52AM +0200, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3_m68k.deb
>
> regards,
>
> Eugen
>
> --
>
> I'm playing with aranym and I have "debootstraped"
Hi Laurent,
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/openssl_0.9.8c-4etch3_m68k.deb
regards,
Eugen
--
I'm playing with aranym and I have "debootstraped" an etch-m68k root fs.
When I try to install openssh-client it requests:
openssh-client: Depends: libssl0
Hi,
I'm playing with aranym and I have "debootstraped" an etch-m68k root fs.
When I try to install openssh-client it requests:
openssh-client: Depends: libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8c-4etch3) but
0.9.8c-4 is to be installed
E: Broken packages
How can I install openssh-client ?
openssh is in the archive. Updated openssl and openssh-blacklist
are in NEW. The trick to etch-m68k uploads is that we have to
change the source version. We've settled on appending +m68k1 to
the source version.
openssh_4.3p2-9etch2 => openssh_4.3p2-9etch2+m68k1
openssh_4.3p2-9
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:34:22PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 7/15/07, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> >> FYI, i was looking at changelogs both debian and mainline the other day,
> >> trying to figure out where/ if your patches are in
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> I still see only 3 in the debian linux-source-2.6.22-1 package.
Are you sure about that? That's 3 too many -- I haven't sent any patches
against 2.6.22. You should probably be looking in the patching rules
rather than the changelog?
> so I assume th
On 7/15/07, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> FYI, i was looking at changelogs both debian and mainline the other day,
> trying to figure out where/ if your patches are included, I am not sure if
> you are gettting credit where due, I saw ger
Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> ...
>> I remember having a problem with my disk that the 630 would not shut
>> down, rather it would hang, and i had to reboot into macos. that you
>> fixed in the 2.6.20 kernel, that was broken in the 2.6.18.
>>
>
> You are righ
Finn Thain wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
>
>
>> On 7/13/07, Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to try Etch-m68k. The machine I'd like to use is a Quadra 630
>>> with a 1.1G IDE drive and 54M RAM.
&
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 07:44:40PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, no etch script to symlink. Any other suggestion?
>
> sid?
>
> --
> Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for your advice - I'm following the 'man deboot
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> FYI, i was looking at changelogs both debian and mainline the other day,
> trying to figure out where/ if your patches are included, I am not sure if
> you are gettting credit where due, I saw gert/roman in the mainline
> and christian in the debian but i
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:04:00PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> >
> > FYI, i was looking at changelogs both debian and mainline the other
> > day, trying to figure out where/ if your patches are included, I am
> > not sure if you are getttin
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 7/14/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/13/07, Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > I'd l
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:04:00PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
>
> FYI, i was looking at changelogs both debian and mainline the other day,
> trying to figure out where/ if your patches are included, I am not sure if
> you are gettting credit where due, I saw gert/roman in the mainline
> and christ
After adding etch-m68k to sources.list and re-installing debootstrap
it looks like your suggestion is worth trying.
Will let you know how it goes.
:r! ls -l /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts
total 96
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5433 2007-02-16 14:48 breezy
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root3 2007-07-15 07:43
On 7/14/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to try Etch-m68k. The machine I'd like to use is a Quadra 630
> > with a 1.1G IDE drive and 54M
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to try Etch-m68k. The machine I'd like to use is a Quadra 630
> > with a 1.1G IDE drive and 54M RAM.
Are you sure about that? One simm, plus 4 soldered
gt; > > and then will chroot etch-m68k, unstable, sid using debootrap.
> > > The copy I have has scripts up-to sarge and sid but not for
> > > etch-m68k or lenny. Any advice?
> > > Thanks again for the advice.
> > > larry
> >
> > You might sho
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 01:02:35PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 08:09:53AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Thanks for the advice, I am remaking the system as a plain sarge
> > and then will chroot etch-m68k, unstable, sid using debootrap.
> >
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 08:09:53AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, I am remaking the system as a plain sarge
> and then will chroot etch-m68k, unstable, sid using debootrap.
> The copy I have has scripts up-to sarge and sid but not for
> etch-m68k or lenny
Thanks for the advice, I am remaking the system as a plain sarge
and then will chroot etch-m68k, unstable, sid using debootrap.
The copy I have has scripts up-to sarge and sid but not for
etch-m68k or lenny. Any advice?
Thanks again for the advice.
larry
--
insert longitude and latitude etc
On 7/13/07, Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to try Etch-m68k. The machine I'd like to use is a Quadra 630
with a 1.1G IDE drive and 54M RAM. It currently has a working Sarge
install that's just been used for experimental purposes. I'm not too
concerned
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:32:52PM -0500, Joel Ewy wrote:
> 2. I would like to switch to a 2.6 kernel. I just tried a 2.6.18-4-mac
> floppy image from the EMILE SourceForge page. It boots and I can SSH
> in, but ADB seems to be broken (or maybe it's hardcoded for a non-US
> keyboard layout? (Is
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Joel Ewy wrote:
> 1. I would like to try doing a dist-upgrade. Is this likely to have
> any chance of working? I've got 343M free on the drive. I can
> uninstall some big packages for the upgrade and reinstall them later if
> I'm likely to need more disk space.
Sure! That'
I'd like to try Etch-m68k. The machine I'd like to use is a Quadra 630
with a 1.1G IDE drive and 54M RAM. It currently has a working Sarge
install that's just been used for experimental purposes. I'm not too
concerned about the current contents of the drive. I installed Sa
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:11:45AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > My effort to to build etch-m68k are stalled because the packages I have
> > uploaded are stuck in the new queue and I did not receive instructions
> > how to upload the four rejected packa
Hi,
> My effort to to build etch-m68k are stalled because the packages I have
> uploaded are stuck in the new queue and I did not receive instructions
> how to upload the four rejected packages.
The reason for rejection was that the same package versions do already
exist? Maybe a bin
Dear Debian 68k porters,
My effort to to build etch-m68k are stalled because the packages I have
uploaded are stuck in the new queue and I did not receive instructions
how to upload the four rejected packages.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
> > > Same as the oldstable buildds. Christian can bring garkin back soon I
> > > hope.
> >
> > The oldstable buildds have a wanna-buildd database on buildd.debian.org,
> > etch-m68k and etch-m68k-security don't. buildd can handle that, it can't
uildd.debian.org doesn't have wanna-build db's for either etch-m68k or
> > > etch-m68k-security. If we setup our own, we have to dedicate buildds that
> > > are currently running unstable. I don't think we currently have the depth
> > > to do this. I'
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:15:12AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Eh, I thought the security people wanted to do m68k builds, but I'm not
> > > sure. Joey?
> >
> > buildd.debian.org doesn't have wanna-build db's for either etch-m68k or
> >
> > Eh, I thought the security people wanted to do m68k builds, but I'm not
> > sure. Joey?
>
> buildd.debian.org doesn't have wanna-build db's for either etch-m68k or
> etch-m68k-security. If we setup our own, we have to dedicate buildds that
> are curre
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 06:08:06PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:40:11PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:08:32AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > If you mean for etch, I guess you should upload them to etch-m68k.
> >
&
h security updates that do not build-depend on mysql:
> [...]
> > > Any suggestion concerning what I should do with them ?
> >
> > Upload them to etch-m68k. That or we need to get the security people to
> > create us a distribution. I think the former is easier.
>
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:40:11PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:08:32AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > If you mean for etch, I guess you should upload them to etch-m68k.
>
> I will not do that: I do binary-only upload so etch-m68k Sources file
> w
rning what I should do with them ?
>
> Upload them to etch-m68k. That or we need to get the security people to
> create us a distribution. I think the former is easier.
Eh, I thought the security people wanted to do m68k builds, but I'm not
sure. Joey?
--
Home is where you ha
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:30:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >
> > Any suggestion concerning what I should do with them ?
>
> Upload them to etch-m68k. That or we need to get the security pe
a_0.99.5-5etch2
> samba_3.0.24-6etch4
>
> Any suggestion concerning what I should do with them ?
Upload them to etch-m68k. That or we need to get the security people to
create us a distribution. I think the former is easier.
> There has been a linux-2.6 security update. Was it build for m68
etch1
> > postgresql-7.4_7.4.17-0etch1
> > postgresql-8.1_8.1.9-0etch1
> > pptpd_1.3.0-2etch1
> > quagga_0.99.5-5etch2
> > samba_3.0.24-6etch4
> >
> > Any suggestion concerning what I should do with them ?
>
> If you mean for etch, I guess you should upload them to
gt; Any suggestion concerning what I should do with them ?
If you mean for etch, I guess you should upload them to etch-m68k.
> Is sarge-m68k security updates still built ?
They should be built: php4 and clamav are still missing.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello m68k porters,
I have build all etch security updates that do not build-depend on mysql:
aircrack-ng_0.6.2-7etch1
clamav_0.90.1-3etch2
ekg_1.7~rc2-1etch1
file_4.17-5etch1
freetype_2.2.1-5+etch1
gimp_2.2.13-1etch1
ipsec-tools_0.6.6-3.1etch1
libapache-mod-jk_1.2.18-3etch1
libexif_0.6.13-5etch1
Hello m68k porters,
I have finished the first stage of building etch-m68k, so
here is a summary:
81 packages needed building, see
<http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/m68k/diff-etch-m68k>
18 packages uploaded: 13 are in the NEW queue, 5 were rejected.
16 packages are dep-waiting for mysq
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello m68k porters,
>
> I have retargeted my aranym installation to build for etch-m68k
> (having installed a etch-m68k and cross-compiling with Etch gcc).
>
> So far I have built python2.4_2.4.4-3 and libx11_2:1
Hello m68k porters,
I have retargeted my aranym installation to build for etch-m68k
(having installed a etch-m68k and cross-compiling with Etch gcc).
So far I have built python2.4_2.4.4-3 and libx11_2:1.0.3-7
Should I upload them ? If yes, how should I proceed ?
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EM
me machines up and running to
> > > build for etch/m68k. Most of the packages that aren't built there yet
> > > aren't because we were backlogged at the time, I guess, and those should
> > > probably build without issues. It will require a patched sbuild,
> > &
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:54:24AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> > Replacing stable with etch-m68k seems to work fine as far as the regular
> > archive is concerned. I'm upgrading both ze
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:54:24AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> Replacing stable with etch-m68k seems to work fine as far as the regular
> archive is concerned. I'm upgrading both zeus and poseidon to etch,
> although I hate to lose security support.
> I'm not su
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 02:37:02PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Patched to do what differently?
> >
> > * To recognize etch-m68k as an actually existing suite (that's buildd,
> > really, rather than sbuild, but okay)
>
> Does the build database alre
> > Patched to do what differently?
>
> * To recognize etch-m68k as an actually existing suite (that's buildd,
> really, rather than sbuild, but okay)
Does the build database already know about etch-m68k? Does it even need
to? Can't we just figure out what needs to be
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:04:13AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > After that, it's probably best to get some machines up and running to
> > build for etch/m68k. Most of the packages that aren't built there yet
> > aren't because we were backlogged at th
> So now that etch is finalized, I guess it's time to start working on our
> m68k bits -- not having a moving target to work towards is always
> helpful.
>
> If I understand things right, we can upload packages to etch-m68k by way
> of using "etch-m68k" in place o
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:14:31AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:22:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > After that, it's probably best to get some machines up and running to
> > build for etch/m68k. Most of the packages that aren't b
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:22:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> After that, it's probably best to get some machines up and running to
> build for etch/m68k. Most of the packages that aren't built there yet
> aren't because we were backlogged at the time, I guess, and
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:22:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Anything else someone can come up with?
How about mirror space? I can donate some GBs on my server...
--
Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150
Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg pubkey: h
Hi all,
So now that etch is finalized, I guess it's time to start working on our
m68k bits -- not having a moving target to work towards is always
helpful.
If I understand things right, we can upload packages to etch-m68k by way
of using "etch-m68k" in place of "unstable&q
81 matches
Mail list logo
