On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:45:18 +0200 Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:14:31AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:22:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > After that, it's probably best to get some machines up and running to > > > build for etch/m68k. Most of the packages that aren't built there yet > > > aren't because we were backlogged at the time, I guess, and those should > > > probably build without issues. It will require a patched sbuild, > > > probably, but that's not a big issue. > > > > Couldn't we just do that under the existing w-b setup or will there be > > no support for that? > > Honestly, I dunno. Ryan? I haven't tried to see what all we need changing with the current code to handle "etch-m68k" as a suite name, but don't see why it can't be there while the archive is being hosted on ftp-master.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
