On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:30:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > Any suggestion concerning what I should do with them ? > > Upload them to etch-m68k. That or we need to get the security people to > create us a distribution. I think the former is easier.
Uploading them to etch-m68 is not possible: it is a binary-only upload of different source version than the one in the Source file. And we should stay identical to etch if we hope to be merged again. However I will be able to upload most of them to the 4.0r1 update. > > There has been a linux-2.6 security update. Was it build for m68k or > > should I do it as well ? > > Christian? > > If it's not in etch-m68k, I think it's safe to build. ISTR that it was cross-compiled. However it use gcc-3.3. Are the gcc-3.3 cross-compiler available somewhere ? I would very much like to install in my distcc setup. > > Beside packages build-depending on mysql, it now only remains to build > > etch-proposed-updates, AFAIK. > > Cool. This is done with the caveats of the mysql build-deps, of linux-2.6 and of debian-installer related packages. Should I build the debian-installer related packages ? Is there plan for a m68k d-i update ? Finally: etch 4.0r1 will be released soon. This would be a great time to start security update, so that we are in a good position to ask for inclusion in 4.0r2. We need to set it up as soon as possible. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
