On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 07:28:18AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:15:12AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > Eh, I thought the security people wanted to do m68k builds, but I'm not > > > > sure. Joey? > > > > > > buildd.debian.org doesn't have wanna-build db's for either etch-m68k or > > > etch-m68k-security. If we setup our own, we have to dedicate buildds that > > > are currently running unstable. I don't think we currently have the depth > > > to do this. I'd be pleasantly surprised to learn otherwise, of course. > > > :) > > > > Same as the oldstable buildds. Christian can bring garkin back soon I > > hope. > > The oldstable buildds have a wanna-buildd database on buildd.debian.org, > etch-m68k and etch-m68k-security don't. buildd can handle that, it can't > handle multiple wanna-buildd databases on different servers (now that > I'm thinking about it, I wonder how hard that would be to implement).
Technically we would only need etch-m68k-security since etch-m68k can be handled manually. Cannot we just get the data from etch-security ? they are the same anyway. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
