Hi,
> >> BTW, I noticed I spoke rubbish: my m68k-v2.6.28 branch does have all
> >> the m68k patches.
> >> It's just not so easy to extract them as patches, as this is a
> >> `continuous development branch'.
> >> Should be easier once I have a proper `queue' branch.
> >
> >
> > The git-cherry comma
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 15:21, David D. Kilzer wrote:
> On Thursday, March 12, 2009 6:18:17 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 13:24, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:37:29AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> >> Just to be clear on this - the plan is to
On Thursday, March 12, 2009 6:18:17 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 13:24, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:37:29AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >> Just to be clear on this - the plan is to replace the old quilt
> >> based patch
> >> series with a
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 13:24, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:37:29AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> > Maybe you'll have better luck than I with that approach. :)
>>
>> My understanding of git is still woefully limited.
>
> Mine too. Things like this seem to be driving me
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:37:29AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
Howdy!
> > Maybe you'll have better luck than I with that approach. :)
>
> My understanding of git is still woefully limited.
Mine too. Things like this seem to be driving me forward though.
> Just to be clear on this - th
Hi,
> > > Do you have a modern linux-libc-dev?
> >
> > 2.6.22-6, is that recent enough?
>
> No idea. I seem to have 2.6.26-5 installed. But I have no idea if that
> even is the problem.
I'll see if I can update that. Easier than building a new cross compiler on an
already full disk.
> > Ri
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:56:03PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:22:00PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:10:59AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:39:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:22:00PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:10:59AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:39:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * build cross compiler
> If m68k can not build with the standard g
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:10:59AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:39:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > >
> > > * build cross compiler
> >
> > Which version are you using, 4.3? I built it according to your instructions
>
> I used 4.2, since 4.3 had the ice
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:39:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:51:32AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 03:42:53AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > >
> > > > The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably ti
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 06:15:03AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > include/linux/kernel.h:219: error: syntax error before "va_list"
> > > include/linux/kernel.h:220: warning: function declaration isn't a
> > > prototype
> > > make[4]: *** [arch/m68k/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
> > >
Hi,
> > include/linux/kernel.h:219: error: syntax error before "va_list"
> > include/linux/kernel.h:220: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
> > make[4]: *** [arch/m68k/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
> >
> > Some way or other, the include path gets messed up so stdarg.h isn't found
>
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:51:32AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 03:42:53AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > > The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably time to
> > > update the m68k patches.
> > >
> > > So how many of these [1] patch
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:59:05AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
Howdy Michael,
> > > You go ahead :-) Last time I tried, I could not even build a kernel image
> > > from
> > > the Debian release source kit.
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPacka
Hi Stephen,
> > You go ahead :-) Last time I tried, I could not even build a kernel image
> > from
> > the Debian release source kit.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage
> http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/kernel/dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/config/m68k/README.build?
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 03:42:53AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> > The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably time to
> > update the m68k patches.
> >
> > So how many of these [1] patches should go into the debian kernel?
> > Everything that's not commented, POSTPON
Hi Stephen,
> The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably time to
> update the m68k patches.
>
> So how many of these [1] patches should go into the debian kernel?
> Everything that's not commented, POSTPONED, or PRIVATE?
Looks like you want all that are not commented or PRIVATE in t
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 15:37, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:48:48AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 21:28, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> > The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably time to
>> > update the m68k patches.
>
>> Please note
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:48:48AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 21:28, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably time to
> > update the m68k patches.
> Please note that I no longer maintain the quilt series file. I'm using
> g
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 21:28, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably time to
> update the m68k patches.
>
> So how many of these [1] patches should go into the debian kernel?
> Everything that's not commented, POSTPONED, or PRIVATE?
>
> If anyone else wan
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably time to
> update the m68k patches.
>
> So how many of these [1] patches should go into the debian kernel?
> Everything that's not commented, POSTPONED, or PRIVATE?
For my part, those are the
The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably time to
update the m68k patches.
So how many of these [1] patches should go into the debian kernel?
Everything that's not commented, POSTPONED, or PRIVATE?
If anyone else wants the job, please jump right on it. ;)
Thanks,
Stephen
[1]
htt
22 matches
Mail list logo
