On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 13:24, Stephen R Marenka <step...@marenka.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:37:29AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> > Maybe you'll have better luck than I with that approach. :)
>>
>> My understanding of git is still woefully limited.
>
> Mine too. Things like this seem to be driving me forward though.
>
>> Just to be clear on this - the plan is to replace the old quilt based patch
>> series with a git based one, right?
>
> Geert doesn't do quilt any more. So we need a workflow that pulls
> the patches we want (for some definition) from Geert's repo and
> updates the debian kernel package.
I plan to create a special `queue' branch for that. But probably that
won't happen
before 2.6.29.
> We need to make sure we have all the aranym patches too, since I don't
> think they've gone upstream. I don't know if they're all in his git
> or not.
The ARAnyM patches should are in my git tree.
BTW, I noticed I spoke rubbish: my m68k-v2.6.28 branch does have all
the m68k patches.
It's just not so easy to extract them as patches, as this is a
`continuous development branch'.
Should be easier once I have a proper `queue' branch.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert (also thinking hard about proper git workflows,
both at home
and at work ;-)
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
