On Thursday, March 12, 2009 6:18:17 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 13:24, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:37:29AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > >> Just to be clear on this - the plan is to replace the old quilt > >> based patch > >> series with a git based one, right? > > > > Geert doesn't do quilt any more. So we need a workflow that pulls > > the patches we want (for some definition) from Geert's repo and > > updates the debian kernel package. > > I plan to create a special `queue' branch for that. But probably that > won't happen > before 2.6.29. > > > We need to make sure we have all the aranym patches too, since I don't > > think they've gone upstream. I don't know if they're all in his git > > or not. > > The ARAnyM patches should are in my git tree. > > BTW, I noticed I spoke rubbish: my m68k-v2.6.28 branch does have all > the m68k patches. > It's just not so easy to extract them as patches, as this is a > `continuous development branch'. > Should be easier once I have a proper `queue' branch.
The git-cherry command might help you out here if you have the original v2.6.28 branch in the same git tree. Also see git-format-patch for extracting a series of patches from a branch (formatted as email messages). Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
