On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:48:48AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 21:28, Stephen R Marenka <step...@marenka.net> wrote: > > The debian 2.6.28 kernel has hit sid, so it's probably time to > > update the m68k patches.
> Please note that I no longer maintain the quilt series file. I'm using > git only now. I was wondering if that wasn't true. > For 2.6.28, there's a separate branch: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git;a=shortlog;h=m68k-v2.6.28 > > Hmm, I've just noticed this is Linus' v2.6.28 with only a few new m68k > patches applied, while I think > I intended it to be the master (m68k) branch just after I merged it > with v2.6.28, with newer > critical patches applied when needed. Oh well... So what do you recommend for 2.6.28? I'd like to get a functional debian kernel in the meantime. Should I start with the quilt patches? > But even if it was what I had intended, you'd still have to use `git > cherry' to find the m68k-specific commits > and import them into Debian. So I should have all changes nicely > rebased (and reordered/squashed) against Linus' latest tree, so you > can easily export them. This would also help in keeping track what > needs to be submitted upstream. That sounds like a whole new world of workflow to me. So I'll need your 2.6.x, linus's 2.6.x, and debian svn to figure out which patches need applying? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <step...@marenka.net>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
