The next #m68k chat will be this upcoming friday with two
interesting
topics, and as always, a nice chat:
Feature 1: Cameron Kaiser on Alpha Micro Machines - lesser known
m68k machines
Feature 2: Urs König on Sinclair QL (History, Ecosystem and
history and modern extensions, QL operating
Next m68k developers chat:
Date: Friday 18th December 2020, 19:00 H CET (18:00H / 06:00 PM
UTC)
Location: https://public.senfcall.de/m68k (will be available
before the event starts)
Topic 1: Nick Desaulniers on compiling the Linux Kernel for m68k
with LLVM
Topic 2: First
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:57:39AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:55 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
> > Just discovered this morning that qemu is gaining emulation support for the
> > NeXT Cube, very cool:
> >
Hi Adrian,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:55 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Just discovered this morning that qemu is gaining emulation support for the
> NeXT Cube, very cool:
>
> > https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=956a78118bfc7fa512b03cbe8a77b9384c6d89f4
Nice! N
Hi!
Just discovered this morning that qemu is gaining emulation support for the
NeXT Cube, very cool:
https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=956a78118bfc7fa512b03cbe8a77b9384c6d89f4
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glau
e:
> > >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > >> > 16:26???«laffer1:#midnightbsd» previous, a NeXT emulator.
> > >> > http://previous.alternative-system.com/
> > >> >
> > >> > Apparen
t; >> > 16:26???«laffer1:#midnightbsd» previous, a NeXT emulator.
> >> > http://previous.alternative-system.com/
> >> >
> >> > Apparently based on Hatari. But its Docs say NetBSD/next68k works,
> >> > as do old NeXTstep versions.
> >
On 12/22/2014 06:45 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> https://gitorious.org/qemu-m68k/qemu-m68k/commits/next-cube
Whoa, this is actually pretty cool. I would love to have qemu
m68k support. In the end, we might even be able to use kvm
to run an emulated Linux/m68k.
Where can I throw my money at
Hi,
3 years ago, a google student has worked on qemu to be able to emulate
next-cube. He was able to boot nextstep, but not really more.
I didn't touch anything since, but the branch is always there. Perhaps I
can try to rebase it on qemu-2.2 and all my m68k emulation improvements.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 07:40:47PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> > 16:26???«laffer1:#midnightbsd» previous, a NeXT emulator.
>> >
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 07:40:47PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > 16:26???«laffer1:#midnightbsd» previous, a NeXT emulator.
> > http://previous.alternative-system.com/
> >
> > Apparently based on Hata
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> 16:26⎜«laffer1:#midnightbsd» previous, a NeXT emulator.
> http://previous.alternative-system.com/
>
> Apparently based on Hatari. But its Docs say NetBSD/next68k works,
> as do old NeXTstep versions.
>
> Maybe inte
On 12/14/2014 05:33 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> 16:26⎜«laffer1:#midnightbsd» previous, a NeXT emulator.
> http://previous.alternative-system.com/
>
> Apparently based on Hatari. But its Docs say NetBSD/next68k works,
> as do old NeXTstep versions.
I actually started packaging i
16:26⎜«laffer1:#midnightbsd» previous, a NeXT emulator.
http://previous.alternative-system.com/
Apparently based on Hatari. But its Docs say NetBSD/next68k works,
as do old NeXTstep versions.
Maybe interesting.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Gast: „Ein Bier, bitte!“
Wirt: „Geht auch alkoholfrei?“
Gast
gt; build states, not-for-us is also for “packages that need porting”
> so it might stick. If not, we could always look for a better
> solution. (w-b --list=not-for-us seems to show the list, so we’d
> also not “lose/forget” packages there.)
We can do that, I suppose, but we'll ne
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>> >It's probably better to add them to no-auto-build on all our buildd
>> >hosts -- or, better yet, to use packages-arch-specific for that. Not
>>
>> I think adding one entry into one centralised database is better
>> than distributing a file across all hosts or…
>>
>> >sur
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:55:37PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
> >
> >ssh leda.debian.net # I see there's a 'tg' user there already; we may
> > need to ask for a glaubitz one, too
> >wanna-buil
ldd config files -- especially if it tends to
change all the time.
Would you take that up with Aurélien? Since you seem to be putting more
time into getting the hard packages to work again, it makes sense if you
commit to p-a-s. Meanwhile I'll try to get more buildd machines up and
running ;-)
[.
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>Mmm. Actually, I'm starting to doubt if that --no-build isn't reset
>after an installation event; it might be.
Resetting it manually would be easy.
>It's probably better to add them to no-auto-build on all our buildd
>hosts -- or, better yet, to use packages-arch-specific
d to problems. I think just taking it (in
> an older version) for building will not prevent that.
No, that's correct; in fact, wanna-build will just send you a mail then,
stating that "there's a new package, but took it for building now.
You're right, taking a package fo
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>> What about those where I have patches
>> in unreleased?
>
>Eh. If they're built and uploaded, they *should* show as "installed". If
>they're not built yet, just take them for building, so no buildd tries
>to build them.
Hum. These where my upload to unreleased is indeed
and isn't reset after a
new upload. Please don't use that except for packages that are
architecture-specific to other architectures.
--
Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you
to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and
s
ngs go downhill from there. We're working on it right now; it looks
like it *should* be in working order now, but I won't say I'm sure until
I actually see it uploading packages ;-)
Getting places, anyway.
--
Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you
t
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
>
>ssh leda.debian.net # I see there's a 'tg' user there already; we may
> need to ask for a glaubitz one, too
>wanna-build -A m68k -d unstable --list=needs-build | head -n 10 # or so
># now pick one
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
Great, thanks! I will mark all those as failed which I have
in my list as FTBFS. What about those where I have patches
in unreleased? Looks like --no-build is for them? (Right
now, that’s mostly eglibc, gcc-4.6 and qt4
d state turns to installed after the
> next run of dinstall or whatever that is. Maybe some things changed a little
> since then...
To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
ssh leda.debian.net # I see there's a 'tg' user there already; we may
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>So, I guess that's what you could call the world ending ;).
Judging from XTaran’s upload, zsh 5.0 was also released.
/me picks out a fitting .signature line (ft is a zsh committer, FWIW)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:22:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dixi quod…
> >John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
> >>Tcl/Tk 8.6 is also already out:
> >
> >I noticed ;-)
>
> In fact:
>
> Package: vigor
> Version: 0.016-21
> Architecture: m68k
> Maintainer: Colin Watson
> Installed-Size: 55
Ingo Jürgensmann dixit:
>The problem is, that you'll need to find a solution of hiding/marking
>already signed mails/uploaded packages. When builld admin A
>signs/uploads a package or mark it whatever state, that should be
No, it’s not about buildd package management what I was proposing.
All of
t, successful or such. When you upload it to incoming
the state should turn uploaded where it eventuell get autoaccepted (when you're
a buildd) and state turns to installed after the next run of dinstall or
whatever that is.
Maybe some things changed a little since then...
--
Ciao...
Ingo Jürgensmann dixit:
>How about acting as buildd admin? ;-)
>As far as I know (because Wouter mentioned it somewhere) the buildds
>are now signing and uploading successful builds on their on,
>leveraging the work load for a buildd in general.
Hrm.
How about we set up a mailing list for that,
Dixi quod…
>John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>>Tcl/Tk 8.6 is also already out:
>
>I noticed ;-)
In fact:
Package: vigor
Version: 0.016-21
Architecture: m68k
Maintainer: Colin Watson
Installed-Size: 555
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7), libncurses5 (>= 5.5-5~), libtinfo5, libx11-6, tcl8.6
(>= 8.6
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>Even worse, they're gonna release E17 today:
Wow. That was something like Duke Nukem Forever, IIRC…
>Tcl/Tk 8.6 is also already out:
I noticed ;-)
-rw-r--r-- 1 tg tg1982 Dec 21 11:09
DP/dists/m68k/main/Built/tk8.6_8.6.0-1_m68k.changes
-rw-r--r-- 1 tg tg
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:03:07PM +0100, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> >> When you’re done setting up buildd I’d like to have a copy of
> >> the config so I can set one up as well. (Most likely the one
> >> on zigo’s Xen system; the ones on my workstation at work are
> >> in an internal network, plus
Am 21.12.2012 um 11:00 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
>>> I think we're now in a state where we could request w-b & upload queue
>>> access and continue to configure buildd.
>> Wow! I almost had thought it would never happen ☺
> Me, too. Congrats from me as well!
Still some things to do...b
Am 21.12.2012 um 10:39 schrieb Thorsten Glaser :
> IIRC w-b access is simple (sending public keys of some sort to
> aurel32),
Yeah, but before we need the buildd itself configured properly. There are many
cryptic options for me and I hope Wouter will find some little time to provide
a little he
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 09:39:19AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Ingo J?rgensmann dixit:
>
> >I think we're now in a state where we could request w-b & upload queue
> >access and continue to configure buildd.
>
> Wow! I almost had thought it would never happen ☺
Me, too. Congrats from me as we
Ingo J�rgensmann dixit:
>I think we're now in a state where we could request w-b & upload queue
>access and continue to configure buildd.
Wow! I almost had thought it would never happen ☺
No wonder they say today is the world’s end…
IIRC w-b access is simple (sending public keys of some sort to
Hi!
After Elgar I've setup Vivaldi as well. It already successfully built bcron,
but I need to check mail settings. Next is Arrakis tomorrow.
I'm setting all buildds up the same way: schroot with LVM snapshots. We could
use btrfs snapshots as well, but I'm too unexperienced w
O.k. I just upgraded the TT-RAM from 128MB to 256MB and now the kernel
crashes with this.
Notice that node_mem_map is for the TT-RAM now.
Any ideas ?
Alan.
Linux version 3.2.0-atari-12913-g35c175f-dirty (root@server) (gc
c version 4.5.3 (Gentoo 4.5.3-r1 p1.0, pie-0.4.5) ) #43 Tue Jan 1
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.5-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
here’s the next round of m68k support. The patches have accumulated
by discussion on the mailing list; they are not yet regression te-
sted, but this is tracked by the submitters, and the binary packages
compiled from this work
We are one of the world leading legal sources for male impotence treatments
http://rxmnr.olrhspoz3y6ea7o.strengthyhm.com
Nancy Reagan fell down and broke her hair.
Strong beliefs win strong men, and then make them stronger.
Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.
Stapleton,
SKRCO, Inc. (OTC-SKCI) Could This Stock Move Up
Dramatically From Here?
Manufactures and Distributes The Polar Pitcher?-
Keeping Chilled Beverages Chilled.
On the Recommended L i s t of Both Applebee's?and
Holiday Inn Express?
Current Price- .40
An Absolutely Massive Ongoing PR Campa
Greetings;
I am hoping someone here in the m68k community can offer some insight
into an anomalie that is keeping MPD out of testing. I uploaded the
first version which built just fine according to the following:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mpd&ver=0.11.4-1.1&arch=m68k&stamp=109275153
Receive an absolutely free 3 day 2 night
vaction voucher to your choice of several
fantastic destinations around the world.
Think this is too good to be true?
Hotels frequently give away free rooms in
order to get you in their hotels hoping you
will spend money on their services.
Visit the l
Op wo 08-10-2003, om 00:01 schreef John Klos:
> Hi,
>
> > Op di 07-10-2003, om 18:50 schreef Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > > Ugh... How do you build a kernel for NeXT? Support for NeXT was never
> > > finished,
> > > and never integrated in the Linux/m68k kernel
Hi,
> Op di 07-10-2003, om 18:50 schreef Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > Ugh... How do you build a kernel for NeXT? Support for NeXT was never
> > finished,
> > and never integrated in the Linux/m68k kernel source tree.
>
> Yeah, I found that out in the mean time. Since th
Op di 07-10-2003, om 18:50 schreef Geert Uytterhoeven:
> Ugh... How do you build a kernel for NeXT? Support for NeXT was never
> finished,
> and never integrated in the Linux/m68k kernel source tree.
Yeah, I found that out in the mean time. Since there's a link on the
linux-m68k pa
8040, 2G HD.
> >
> > if it can be done, what are de system requiements?
>
> Linux/m68k runs on those systems, yes, but Debian doesn't provide an
> installer, since no Debian developer has the hardware.
>
> However, that shouldn't mean you cannot possibly i
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> They tell me I can do anything to the NeXT box.
>
> So what i have to do first?
Post on the Linux/m68k kernel hackers mailing list? (Added to CC)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uyt
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:22:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Good news!
>
> They tell me I can do anything to the NeXT box.
>
> So what i have to do first?
how about the m68k Installation Manual, to at least get familiar
with what's been done befo
Op ma 06-10-2003, om 23:22 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi!
>
> Good news!
>
> They tell me I can do anything to the NeXT box.
>
> So what i have to do first?
Read the docs :)
There's a link to running Linux on a NeXT from the linux-m68k pages at
http://www.linux
Hi!
Good news!
They tell me I can do anything to the NeXT box.
So what i have to do first?
Thanks.
quiements?
Linux/m68k runs on those systems, yes, but Debian doesn't provide an
installer, since no Debian developer has the hardware.
However, that shouldn't mean you cannot possibly install Debian on it;
you should be able to install Linux/m68k on your NeXT, install
debootstrap, cr
Hi!
My question is:
Can debian be installed on a black NeXTstation?
(Actually using NeXTStep.)
the procesor is a motorola 68040, 2G HD.
if it can be done, what are de system requiements?
plz, Cc me (i'm not in the list)
Thank you.
55 matches
Mail list logo
