On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:30:49PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Wouter Verhelst dixit: > > >To make this a bit more practical and directly useful: > > Great, thanks! I will mark all those as failed which I have > in my list as FTBFS. What about those where I have patches > in unreleased?
Eh. If they're built and uploaded, they *should* show as "installed". If they're not built yet, just take them for building, so no buildd tries to build them. > Looks like --no-build is for them? No, that means we don't ever want to build them, and isn't reset after a new upload. Please don't use that except for packages that are architecture-specific to other architectures. -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121224151008.gb11...@grep.be
