Wouter Verhelst dixit: >Mmm. Actually, I'm starting to doubt if that --no-build isn't reset >after an installation event; it might be.
Resetting it manually would be easy. >It's probably better to add them to no-auto-build on all our buildd >hosts -- or, better yet, to use packages-arch-specific for that. Not I think adding one entry into one centralised database is better than distributing a file across all hosts or… >sure if we have that, though -- will check with aurelien. Meanwhile, … committing to P-A-S into git (I think I’ve seen it there). >please send me a full list of all (source) packages that have and >require patches, so I can add them all to no-auto-build everywhere. The list is pretty dynamic… but I can try to figure them out and send them, yes. >You're right, taking a package for build is not the right solution; but >neither is not-for-us. Hm. Not fully convinced yet, but you have seniority. bye, //mirabilos -- I want one of these. They cost 720 € though… good they don’t have the HD hole, which indicates 3½″ floppies with double capacity… still. A tad too much, atm. ‣ http://www.floppytable.com/floppytable-images-1.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1212241559550.23...@herc.mirbsd.org
