On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 07:30:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >> >It's probably better to add them to no-auto-build on all our buildd
> >> >hosts -- or, better yet, to use packages-arch-specific for that. Not
> >>
> >> I think adding one entry into one centralised d
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>> >It's probably better to add them to no-auto-build on all our buildd
>> >hosts -- or, better yet, to use packages-arch-specific for that. Not
>>
>> I think adding one entry into one centralised database is better
>> than distributing a file across all hosts or…
>>
>> >sur
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:55:37PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
> >
> >ssh leda.debian.net # I see there's a 'tg' user there already; we may
> > need to ask for a glaubitz one, too
> >wanna-buil
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:01:38PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >Mmm. Actually, I'm starting to doubt if that --no-build isn't reset
> >after an installation event; it might be.
>
> Resetting it manually would be easy.
Yes, but we wouldn't *want* it to be reset.
Wh
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>Mmm. Actually, I'm starting to doubt if that --no-build isn't reset
>after an installation event; it might be.
Resetting it manually would be easy.
>It's probably better to add them to no-auto-build on all our buildd
>hosts -- or, better yet, to use packages-arch-specific
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 03:17:52PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >> What about those where I have patches
> >> in unreleased?
> >
> >Eh. If they're built and uploaded, they *should* show as "installed". If
> >they're not built yet, just take them for building, so no bu
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>> What about those where I have patches
>> in unreleased?
>
>Eh. If they're built and uploaded, they *should* show as "installed". If
>they're not built yet, just take them for building, so no buildd tries
>to build them.
Hum. These where my upload to unreleased is indeed
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:30:49PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
>
> Great, thanks! I will mark all those as failed which I have
> in my list as FTBFS. What about those where I have patches
> in unreleased?
Eh.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:55:37PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>
> >To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
> >
> >ssh leda.debian.net # I see there's a 'tg' user there already; we may
> > need to ask for a glaubitz one, too
> >wanna-buil
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
>
>ssh leda.debian.net # I see there's a 'tg' user there already; we may
> need to ask for a glaubitz one, too
>wanna-build -A m68k -d unstable --list=needs-build | head -n 10 # or so
># now pick one
Wouter Verhelst dixit:
>To make this a bit more practical and directly useful:
Great, thanks! I will mark all those as failed which I have
in my list as FTBFS. What about those where I have patches
in unreleased? Looks like --no-build is for them? (Right
now, that’s mostly eglibc, gcc-4.6 and qt4
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:48:16PM +0100, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> In general you question the w-b database by invoking something like
> wanna-build --query or --list or so and it gives back some packages. You can
> then claim a package by issueing another w-b call and the state turns from
> needs
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>So, I guess that's what you could call the world ending ;).
Judging from XTaran’s upload, zsh 5.0 was also released.
/me picks out a fitting .signature line (ft is a zsh committer, FWIW)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:22:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dixi quod…
> >John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
> >>Tcl/Tk 8.6 is also already out:
> >
> >I noticed ;-)
>
> In fact:
>
> Package: vigor
> Version: 0.016-21
> Architecture: m68k
> Maintainer: Colin Watson
> Installed-Size: 55
Ingo Jürgensmann dixit:
>The problem is, that you'll need to find a solution of hiding/marking
>already signed mails/uploaded packages. When builld admin A
>signs/uploads a package or mark it whatever state, that should be
No, it’s not about buildd package management what I was proposing.
All of
Am 21.12.2012 um 15:20 schrieb Thorsten Glaser :
>> How about acting as buildd admin? ;-)
>> As far as I know (because Wouter mentioned it somewhere) the buildds
>> are now signing and uploading successful builds on their on,
>> leveraging the work load for a buildd in general.
> How about we set
Ingo Jürgensmann dixit:
>How about acting as buildd admin? ;-)
>As far as I know (because Wouter mentioned it somewhere) the buildds
>are now signing and uploading successful builds on their on,
>leveraging the work load for a buildd in general.
Hrm.
How about we set up a mailing list for that,
Dixi quod…
>John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>>Tcl/Tk 8.6 is also already out:
>
>I noticed ;-)
In fact:
Package: vigor
Version: 0.016-21
Architecture: m68k
Maintainer: Colin Watson
Installed-Size: 555
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7), libncurses5 (>= 5.5-5~), libtinfo5, libx11-6, tcl8.6
(>= 8.6
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>Even worse, they're gonna release E17 today:
Wow. That was something like Duke Nukem Forever, IIRC…
>Tcl/Tk 8.6 is also already out:
I noticed ;-)
-rw-r--r-- 1 tg tg1982 Dec 21 11:09
DP/dists/m68k/main/Built/tk8.6_8.6.0-1_m68k.changes
-rw-r--r-- 1 tg tg
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:03:07PM +0100, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> >> When you’re done setting up buildd I’d like to have a copy of
> >> the config so I can set one up as well. (Most likely the one
> >> on zigo’s Xen system; the ones on my workstation at work are
> >> in an internal network, plus
Am 21.12.2012 um 11:00 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
>>> I think we're now in a state where we could request w-b & upload queue
>>> access and continue to configure buildd.
>> Wow! I almost had thought it would never happen ☺
> Me, too. Congrats from me as well!
Still some things to do...b
Am 21.12.2012 um 10:39 schrieb Thorsten Glaser :
> IIRC w-b access is simple (sending public keys of some sort to
> aurel32),
Yeah, but before we need the buildd itself configured properly. There are many
cryptic options for me and I hope Wouter will find some little time to provide
a little he
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 09:39:19AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Ingo J?rgensmann dixit:
>
> >I think we're now in a state where we could request w-b & upload queue
> >access and continue to configure buildd.
>
> Wow! I almost had thought it would never happen ☺
Me, too. Congrats from me as we
Ingo J�rgensmann dixit:
>I think we're now in a state where we could request w-b & upload queue
>access and continue to configure buildd.
Wow! I almost had thought it would never happen ☺
No wonder they say today is the world’s end…
IIRC w-b access is simple (sending public keys of some sort to
Hi!
After Elgar I've setup Vivaldi as well. It already successfully built bcron,
but I need to check mail settings. Next is Arrakis tomorrow.
I'm setting all buildds up the same way: schroot with LVM snapshots. We could
use btrfs snapshots as well, but I'm too unexperienced with btrfs, so I st
25 matches
Mail list logo
