On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:49:02 -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> During that meeting, we decided we would hold IRC meetings each 2nd
> Thursday from 20:00 to 22:00 UTC.
>
> This means the next meeting will be held on *Thursday August 11th, from
> 20:00 to 22:00 UTC*.
Maybe the new meeting t
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 22:47:06 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Joerg Jaspert [2015-08-08 22:31 +0200]:
> > Just from looking at the Neckar here and what kind of boats
> > / ships pass by, crazy would be the most polite description
> > I would attach to people swimming there.
> Right by
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:08:57 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I noticed in http://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml, that is required to
> be accepted by speakers in DebConf, that is still says "All presentation
> material should be suitable for people aged 12 and above."
[..]
> It could be ok if that
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 00:35:11 +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> Open questions
>
> - What tasks have been forgotten in the list above, and where would they fit
> in?
Room assignment / rootmate matching --> "Participant assistance"
subteam.
> - Are the subteam names above OK or too neutral so that the
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:17:20 +0200, Tobias Preuss wrote:
> Would you mind adding attributes to the XML output of the schedule?
> This snippet shows the different number of attributes - timestamps are
> not adapted:
>
> debconf14.xml
>
>
> schedule.xml
> start="2013-12-27T10:00:00+01:00">
JFYI
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 20:09:01 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> What I find weird is that at least around 15 of the evens have "BoF" in
> their name, so I assume they are BoFs and not talks? I was under the
> impression that those are discinct type of events. Most notably, that a
> BoF in general doe
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:40:37 -0700, Patty Langasek wrote:
> > - debian-perl:
> > my initial question:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2014/05/msg00083.html
> > my summary: https://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2014/06/msg00053.html
> Excellent. Do you have information yet on how many,
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:03:33 -0700, Patty Langasek wrote:
> And, quite frankly, I'm extremely insulted by the attitude of those who have
> been crying out about the lack of a DebCamp and declaring that the lack is a
> "bug" from DC14's planning, but haven't been bothered to even *apply* for a
> sp
On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:45:23 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The format this year has been deliberately
> designed to improve upon the status quo,
FYI: This "improvment" means that several people won't be coming (no
quotable sources, just random private conversations).
> with the explicit unders
On Fri, 09 May 2014 16:49:24 +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> >>> KGB-2 updated.
> >> KGB-1 too.
> > KGB-0 updated, with one additional change. I have marked the
> > sponsors-table repository as 'private' so that the commits do not end
> > up on #commits@freenode.
> Oh, good point!! I fixed that t
On Thu, 08 May 2014 12:11:02 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Please adjust the KGB config for "sponsors-table" to not announce on
> #debconf-team.
KGB-2 updated.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admi
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:49:08 -0500, Brian Gupta wrote:
(Some thought from an outsider:)
> Need volunteers:
>
> Reports from DebCamp
Can probably moved from (my and/or others) participants' impressions.
> Cheese and Wine party
> Freetime activities
I guess those two sec
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:32:58 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> So, in keeping with having something ready by October 31st, I wanted to
> open this up to the team for feedback. Here's a link to the PDF:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debconf-data/dc14/sponsorship-brochure/brochure.en.pdf
Just o
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:48:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Just to clarify: does this mean that the dorms are available in
> > theory earlier for a smaller group of people? If yes, do you happen
> > to know the dates / number of places?
> I believe the answer is that in theory, yes - there may
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 16:59:50 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 10:50:26 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Clarifying something from Patty's original mail, the precise limits on the
> > venue are:
> [..]
> > - August 22: earliest date that PSU can ac
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:07:30 -0700, Patty Langasek wrote:
> So, yes, this can be an option. If the global team and chairs determine that
> the cost is justified.
Good to have this new option!
> Would Steve's suggestion of an 8 day (or whatever the details come out to)
> conference justify a lon
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 10:50:26 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Clarifying something from Patty's original mail, the precise limits on the
> venue are:
[..]
> - August 22: earliest date that PSU can accomodate a full set of people in
>the dorms
[..]
Just to clarify: does this mean that the dorms
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:18:10 -0700, Patty Langasek wrote:
> This was part of a long debate - unless we have enough volunteers dedicated
> to handling this, or people who will take responsibility in the event that
> the volunteers ... choose not to complete this task, it's unreasonable to
> expec
On Tue, 07 May 2013 11:36:26 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> After somebody clicks to "save" their details, do they need to click
> somewhere else to submit their registration?
> Is there meant to be any email confirmation that the registration has
> been submitted?
http://debconf13.debconf.org/reg
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:13:35 +, Moray Allan wrote:
> >- Large, Medium and Small may mean different things to different
> >people.
> > But "2 to 20 person sleeping-bag room" seems too verbose (but if
> > others disagree I can live with that).
> I don't see any loss from being verbose, if verb
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:17:41 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I wonder if it would not simplify things if there would be some other
> status of attendee that is not called "professional" but simply covers
> its very own costs.
Isn't that "non-sponsored", i.e. just not applying for
food+accomodatio
On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:03:14 +, Moray Allan wrote:
> On 2012-12-01 00:27, gregor herrmann wrote:
> >I find it quite irritating and disturbing that it's called "threats"
> >when some people explain honestly and transparently in advance "I'm
> >
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:25:23 +, Moray Allan wrote:
> On 2012-11-30 18:59, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >I have also heard disturbing suggestions[1] that members of DC13
> >local team have threatened to quit if they don't get their way on
> >selection of Le Camp as the site.
> [..] if it had not been
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:48:25 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> So, we have two very short tracks, and two tracks that cannot be
> fitted in the schedule I'd set for them (4hr - A full
> afternoon-evening session).
How about setting the long tracks up on either two afternoons or
morning+afternoon
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:57:50 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > The Debian project would like to announce a meeting held between the
> > Government of Serbia and DebConf11 representatives on the occasion of
> > the upcoming Debian conference, DebConf11, to be held in Banja Lu
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:40:48 +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Yes, you're free to arrive/leave one day earlier/later.
If arriving on July 16th is ok, penta [0] needs to be updated.
Cheers,
gregor
[0]
https://penta.debconf.org/javascripts/application.js
function check_dates() {
var dcampstart =
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:11:29 +, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> > If you look at RecentChanges
> > http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges
> > you'll see the spam attack on our wiki has picked up.
> There *is* a maths test box on the acc
From tonight's IRC meeting on #debconf-team, topic AOB:
21:56 anyone else with a point to discuss?
21:56 just curious: what's the status of the dc10 report?
21:56 any dc10 team one here who can tell whats up with dc10 report?
21:57 clint, jeremyb, darst?
21:57i have no idea what's going o
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:43:59 +, Moray Allan wrote:
(Outsider point of view following.)
> (a) where there are mistakes and significant gaps in the summary,
> compared to what really happened in previous years;
IMO your summary describes quite well what happened in the last
years.
> (b) what
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:31:19 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Does anyone know where I can find the script that was used last year to
> determine the key number from the KSP list?
I extracted them manually (probably a combination of
sed/perl/$EDITOR) from the ksp-dc9.txt file and handed gwolf a
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:23:50 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 7. Juli 2010, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, the idea is to start talks at 9:30 and reduce
> > lunch from 2 hours to 1.5 hours.
> is the eating area and the kitchen big enough to cater us all in 1
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:23:54 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
(A participant's comment:)
> Already, some concerns were raised on IRC about only having a 1hr gap
> for lunch.
I agree that 1 hour is probably to short for a large group of people.
> If we want that lunch gap to be 1.5hrs instead
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:57:46 -0500, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> It'd be nice if people had opened the file and glance at it before the global
> meeting, but it is not necessary.
Page 2:
* the first and the second paragraph seem to duplicate some info and
wording ("dedication", "> 1000 developers aro
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 07:20:53 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Still, my general feeling is that Debconfs that happened in July
> (DC3, DC5, DC7, DC9) and even August (DC8) were easier to cope with
> than those that happened in May (DC4, DC6). [ ..] On the other
> hand, we have no experience with
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:05:29 +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > 5. eva blanco will do nametags, she can contact Marga (in spanish) to
> > get the scripts from last year (to get the data out of penta into
> > pdfs..) the nametags should indicate (with icons) accomodation+food
> > status too (a sle
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:46:39 +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > About Cáceres
> > > ---
> > > Cáceres (pronounced like Katheres, with an accent on the a) is the
> > ^^^
> Just to be sure - I'm reading this as setting up the typ
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:55:03 +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> About Cáceres
> ---
> Cáceres (pronounced like Katheres, with an accent on the a) is the
^^^
[..]
> history. An amazing 30 towers from the Muslim period still stand
37 matches
Mail list logo
