On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:36:40PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Daniel Pocock
>
> > Is there some way that some email addresses could have been added to
> > the list more than once? E.g. has somebody done a bulk subscription
> > of addresses that appear in DebConf registration forms withou
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:47:35PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Jonathan McDowell [2015-07-17 14:08 +0200]:
> > You'll need to make it very clear that the water in the bathroom sinks
> > is suitable for drinking; I've been plenty of places where it'
er in the tanks is basically
> the same (at least quaility wise) I'd expect.
You'll need to make it very clear that the water in the bathroom sinks
is suitable for drinking; I've been plenty of places where it's not so
would by default assume it wasn't.
J.
--
Revd Jo
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 09:41:30PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Richard Hartmann
> [2015-01-18 21:31 +0100]:
> > Swag is fine, but I think a coloured badge is overdoing things and
> > will hurt the togetherness during DebConf.
>
> How so?
Now not only do those of us who accept the
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:13:14AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:52:39PM +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> > Personally, I preferred the original Portland proposal of trying a
> > more interleaved schedule -- for me, having blocks of three days for
> > talks / hacking and BOFs ju
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:14:01AM -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 08:07:22PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > I won't argue more on this, as it will start becoming a flamewar if we
>
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 08:07:22PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I won't argue more on this, as it will start becoming a flamewar if we
> don't control ourselves ;-) Whether or not we are having a DebCamp
> should already be decided, and we should work based on that. So I
> won't fan the bug/regressi
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:58:29PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On 21/05/14 02:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > FYI, we do have some data already about this, namely the arrival/departure
> > dates that sponsored attendees have entered when registering. For each
> > night of sponsored accommodation,
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 01:34:58PM -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> It doesn't look like we yet have a shape for how the days should be laid
> out over the conference. Steve put forward a strawman in
>
> http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20131001.175026.0a50b91b.en
[No need to CC me; I do read the debconf lists even if I'm a rare
poster]
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:31:51PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> > Fri, August 22: Arrival day. Dorm check in ava
It doesn't look like we yet have a shape for how the days should be laid
out over the conference. Steve put forward a strawman in
http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20131001.175026.0a50b91b.en.html
and AJ countered in:
http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20131002.135054.6fb41220.en.html
not offended if
it's decided that DebConf shouldn't cater to people like me, but it
should be an informed decision taken by the organizers appreciating that
a certain section of developers will decide not to turn up if things are
too basic.)
J.
--
Revd Jonathan McDowell, ULC | What
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:25:31PM +0100, Velimir Iveljic wrote:
> So as i see nobody has anything more to say on the this, which is not
> what we expected, since we agreed at the last IRC meeting on
> #debconf-team that there's going to be more discussion on this :S
>
> Because of this, and becau
(No need to CC me, I read the list)
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:32:17PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 05:24 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >> On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >
> >> To recap the proposals:
> >>
> >> (0 is the status quo)
> >>
> >> 0: 10:00-12:00, LUNCH, 14:00-16:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:52:07PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:19:31PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> > The $500 is more appropriately not included in the cost evaluation;
> > it's a one time fee that SPI would be paying from general funds (NOT
> > Debian and also NOT
* Every is sponsored for the conference dinner and assumed to be
attending if they're in Penta.
* Leaving for meal at 21:25 tonight from MT.
* For those people looking for t-shirts who have lost theirs or weren't
in Penta we'll start giving away those we still have that haven't been
picked
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > So, I would like to know as soon as possible if I can attend and I
> > will pay for my stay.
>
> You definitly can attend, you can also join us for the meals but I
> think you wil
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:27:48AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> 5. eva blanco will do nametags, she can contact Marga (in spanish) to
> get the scripts from last year (to get the data out of penta into
> pdfs..) the nametags should indicate (with icons) accomodation+food
> status too (a sleeping
07-31 |
64.
Christine Spang | 2009-07-23 | 2009-07-31 |
Dafydd Harries | 2009-07-23 | 2009-07-31 |
65.
Steve McIntyre | 2009-07-23 | 2009-07-31 |
Jonathan McDowell| 2009-07-23 | 2009-
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 02:09:53AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> This is the usual reminder about a global team meeting today, at the
> usual time of 19UTC.
>
> However, also not that there is a local team meeting *this week* on
> Wednesday (July 8), at 19 UTC
>
> Agenda from the wiki, as it is n
It's been pointed out to me on IRC that I should mention this here...
If you're making any changes to an attendee that affects their room
status (ie arrival/departure date, room status (if we're providing or
not)) then please email rooms@ with details of the changes so I can
ensure the room alloca
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:06:54PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> I was working on sanitizing some data in Penta today.
>
> We have four fields related to attendee payments:
> - has_to_pay
> - amount_to_pay
> - has_paid
> - paid_amount
> And thought that, lacking another plan, that these should be
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 07:29:09PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> (are you subscribed?)
Yes, no need to cc me.
> On Mittwoch, 22. April 2009, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > > > Right, somebody answering the traditional ro...@debconf.org
> > > > alias.
> >
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:38:14PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 22. April 2009, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > Right, somebody answering the traditional ro...@debconf.org alias.
>
> Anybody up for this job?
>
> At the moment mails to that address go to /dev/null?
I got vaguely involved wi
[There's no need to CC me, I'm on the list.]
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:47:44PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:34:27PM +0000, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 03:55:26PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > I honestly think
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 03:55:26PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I honestly think it's a big mistake not to go with sponsorship levels,
> as was "decided" (*) in the sponsorship team meeting:
>
> 1. I believe, that we get more money from sponsors, if they have an
> incentive to spend more money to
27 matches
Mail list logo
