On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:29:20PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I haven't heard any objections to this plan. I've updated
>
> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/TalkDecisionEmails
debconf-data/penta/dc10/event-mail-2.py is ready to go[0]. Let me know
if there are any changes not l
Hi,
A while back, when I started fundraising for DebConf I looked on-line
for some training material on fundraising (ping me if you want some
links ;-). One of the things I read was that it is always easier to
raise funds for specific, earmarked purposes than general "save the
world" type of thing
Hi,
Before going down to business, a personal message from moi: in the
last week there has been a number of IRC discussions about our current
fundraising situation. Every now and again somebody will refer to
myself as a "pessimist". I would like to ask for people to think twice
before doing so. Fi
Hi,
In order to calm down after the last couple of hours on #debconf-team, I have
temporarily left most DebConf-related IRC channels and will not be attending
the June 5th global team IRC meeting (remember it's at 19:00 UTC!). Hopefully
this should minimize any disruptive spillover of these tensio
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:15:28 -0400, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> >
> > was that talk accepted?
>
> It is marked as 'undecided candidate', so I guess that means 'no'
I think it means yes based on what we have recently discussed.
m
pgpQeruuHhsbL.p
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> If the talk was accepted, I am ok with that if it fits in our budget, that
> will be more clear after 10th June.
> So what about: we would like to give you sponsored food and bed but we can not
> tell you for sure until the 11-12th June when w
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> was that talk accepted?
It is marked as 'undecided candidate', so I guess that means 'no'
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/deb
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:32:45PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:52:14PM -0400, micah wrote:
> >
> > So there were four people who signed up late to give talks, and had also
> > requested food/board sponsorship. They are currently scheduled to not
> > receive this sponsor
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:52:14PM -0400, micah wrote:
>
> So there were four people who signed up late to give talks, and had also
> requested food/board sponsorship. They are currently scheduled to not
> receive this sponsorship due to requesting it past the deadline. This
> may be considered un
Hi,
On Freitag, 4. Juni 2010, Brian Gupta wrote:
> > What do other talks-team people think? Should we ask for reconsideration
> > of these, or is it fine that they don't get it?
I think people giving talks should at least get free food, esp. if I read that
we asked for submissions after the dead
Hi,
On Freitag, 4. Juni 2010, Richard Darst wrote:
> I only heard comments from maybe 3-4 people. Only one complained
> much, and ey said that ey couldn't come without sponsorship (but ey is
> only from the far side of connecticut). In his case, checking the log
> tables, ey registered on April
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:45:43PM -0400, micah anderson wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:26:46 -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:16:11AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> >
> > > 21 people had sponsorship reduced. I'm sending names to registration@
> > > (and can do herb@ if
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:52 PM, micah wrote:
>
> So there were four people who signed up late to give talks, and had also
> requested food/board sponsorship. They are currently scheduled to not
> receive this sponsorship due to requesting it past the deadline. This
> may be considered unfortunate
So there were four people who signed up late to give talks, and had also
requested food/board sponsorship. They are currently scheduled to not
receive this sponsorship due to requesting it past the deadline. This
may be considered unfortunate for a couple of reasons: a. we actively
solicited and e
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:26:46 -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:16:11AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
>
> > 21 people had sponsorship reduced. I'm sending names to registration@
> > (and can do herb@ if desired).
>
> So, it's clear that this is hard for some attendees (made w
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:11:54 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 06/04/2010 12:37 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> > We appreciate your interest and the time you invested in putting
> > together your proposed event. Our talk selection committee felt
> > your submission on its current form would not a
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
> > On 06/03/2010 04:00 PM, micah anderson wrote:
> >> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:27:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <
> d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> >>> On 06/03/2010 02:59 PM, mica
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 06/04/2010 12:37 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>> We hope this doesn't discourage you from attending Debconf, in
>> fact there will be opportunities for ad-hoc events to occur, if
>> you should wish to still put it on (if you decide to d
On 06/04/2010 12:37 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> We appreciate your interest and the time you invested in putting
> together your proposed event. Our talk selection committee felt
> your submission on its current form would not attract enough
> interest among the DebConf attendees and
i'd rather say
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 06/03/2010 04:00 PM, micah anderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:27:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
>> wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2010 02:59 PM, micah anderson wrote:
2. send a reject notice to the bottom 20 that did not make the c
Hi,
On Freitag, 4. Juni 2010, Brian Gupta wrote:
> I am a bit confused. Are there two different "Debian Days", one that
> overlaps with DebConf and a second that is celebrated internationally on
> the same date every year? (Or is that why people are calling the day at
> DebConf "Open Day"?)
Augus
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Brian Gupta wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:16 PM, ValessioBrito wrote:
>> > Help,
>> > Debian Day is celebrated on August 16 of each year?
>> >
>> > I create wiki page, organized deb a day in the wolrd
On 06/03/2010 03:27 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 06/03/2010 02:59 PM, micah anderson wrote:
>> I would propose that the best way forward, at this point, taking into
>> considerations all the discussions here and on IRC would be this:
>>
>> 1. send an acceptance to all the currently 'accepted
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:16 PM, ValessioBrito wrote:
> > Help,
> > Debian Day is celebrated on August 16 of each year?
> >
> > I create wiki page, organized deb a day in the wolrd.
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDay2010
> >
>
> Interes
24 matches
Mail list logo
