On 06/11/2009 02:45 AM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:56:53AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>> Would someone volunteer to do such job?
>
> I'll organize it.
Thank you, Aníbal!
> I was thinking about accepting only keys that don't suffer from the
> recently discov
On 06/11/2009 01:40 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> However, once such an attack exists, the responsible course of action
> will be to promptly deprecate all keys that rely on SHA1 (in
> self-signatures, etc).
Before this gets misinterpreted, let me clarify: i understand that
pre
On 06/23/2009 12:34 PM, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Frankly, recording the details of the verification performed is
> a first step to improving the ability to assess the strength of the
> link in the web of trust. A simple key sig is not enough, there could
> be a formal process to add to
On 06/23/2009 02:52 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> Additional metadata, e.g. number and expiration date would
> be helpful.
This would certainly be useful from the smiting perspective, but might
raise privacy concerns if people don't want their passport number (or
whatever) bound to their OpenPGP ke
On 06/08/2010 10:01 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> I'm planning on driving down to Debconf from the east coast of Canada. I
> need somewhere to park the rental car for a week. I don't need access
> to the car during the week, but I would like it back at the end of
> debconf. I can pay something ($100
On 07/12/2010 07:24 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:57:15AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
>> Hector,
>>
>> I'm responding since no one else has. I believe that dkg will be
>> coordinating on-site scheduling plans.
>
> iirc, gwolf also volunteered for on-site schedule d
Hi John--
On 07/19/2010 11:14 PM, John Goerzen wrote:
> I would like to participate in the keysigning, but I am confused about
> thie "cross sign your keys" bit. What is this second key I should be
> using and why?
We're hoping to have a solid post-SHA1 web-of-trust before a functional
attack
On 07/20/2010 01:04 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On ma, 2010-07-19 at 23:37 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>> https://we.riseup.net/riseuplabs+paow/openpgp-best-practices#openpgp-key-checks
>
> From the web page:
>
> self-signatures must not use MD5
&
On 07/20/2010 10:36 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:33:42AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>> keys; that's their preference and choice. I just want to make sure my
>> own key won't be rejected by Debian or the keysigning if it lacks an
>> expiration date.
>
> It won't; I have no
On 07/20/2010 11:22 AM, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Besides adding an expiration date, during testing I was able to change the
> expiration date of a newly formed key that had previously been given an one
> to
> not having one at all. I have my doubts concerning whether gpg clients would
> accept an
On 07/21/2010 10:37 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> doesn't gpg default to make signatures which expire on the same day as the
> key
> which is being signed anymore?
I don't think that's currently be the case. My key (0xCCD2ED94D21739E9)
has had an expiration date since it was created, and none of t
On 07/22/2010 10:37 AM, Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> Earlier gpg with defaultsettings asked people when signing keys,
> if they want to let their signature expire on the same date as the key.
Thanks for the info, Judit. Do you know what version that changed with?
I didn't see it in a quick scan of
On 07/22/2010 01:08 PM, David Moreno wrote:
> 2010/7/22 Rogério Brito
>> 2 - The "What to bring" section of the Welcome page [3] says that one
>> should bring a "long" ethernet cable. How long should that be? Are 3
>> meters sufficient?
>>
>> [3] http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/
On 07/20/2010 08:06 PM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> No. I need to register those events. I'll do it as soon as I finish
> corresponding with a few people about their key submissions and after I
> publish the DC10 keyring.
Please let me know when you do register those events. I'll do my best
On 07/27/2010 03:45 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Does anyone have a spare PL2303 USB-to-serial convertor that they don't
> mind borrowing to the video team for the duration of debconf? I was
> supposed to bring four, but miscounted and only brought three.
i've got one here with me, and you can bor
On 07/28/2010 05:18 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I have to note that New York Subway stations seem to be ridiculously warm
> while
> the subway wagons themselves are bloody well air-conditioned.
The former is in large part a consequence of the latter, since all the
subway cars vent their heat into
On 07/28/2010 05:46 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> dkg called and latest reports from the internet say that Carleton is
> better now.
yup! It is improved, though still a bit chilly.
> I called about Davis, and they said that guidelines say that all rooms
> should be between 23.3-25.6 °C (74 - 78 °F)
On 07/29/2010 11:27 AM, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> My default repository is cdn.debian.net:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/02/msg00700.html
>
> It seems that more and more people are using it and d-i would like to
> use it as well:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-
On 07/31/2010 04:16 PM, Luca Capello wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 15:46 -0400, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>>> So, recently, I got in touch with a local group of runners who happen
>>> to organize a 5K (K stands for kilometers, not for thousands of
>>> dollars in prizes) race every other Thursday no
On 08/01/2010 07:38 PM, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
>> John Goerzen dijo [Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 10:24:30AM -0400]:
>> I would not say I'm so knowledgeable, but am currently relying on
>> KVM and a mixture of vserver and openvz (migrating my vservers to
>> openvz). It is an interesting topic, so if Mi
On 08/02/2010 03:34 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Daniel, would you mind moving the event to 17:30-21:00?
Done.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
ht
On 08/03/2010 12:17 AM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Adnan Hodzic writes:
>
>> That's what I was planning of doing, also is there any official
>> "debconf" printers on the campus?
>
> I never saw an answer to this, and didn't have much luck with the
> hostnames on the sign in Carleton; IIRC, only one
On 08/07/2010 12:00 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
> I should have got round to this before people started leaving DebConf,
> but in fact it doesn't make a vast amount of difference as I don't
> actually have any spare stock with me, but there is around 20 yards
> spare from the most recent batch that was
On 08/13/2010 07:25 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> Chris Knadle wrote:
>
>> If you look at the signatures of my key [0x6A9FDD74], I think
>> you'll see something interesting which will also likely answer your
>> question.
>
> Hm, the signature in question is valid exactly 5 years after the
> signin
On 08/19/2010 03:14 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> At least in theory a round robin dns name for all hkps enabled key
> servers would be possible. You just need someone trusted by most users
> to certify that your server is part of the pool. Most CAs (including
> CA-Cert) won't issue more than one c
On 08/18/2010 05:13 PM, Luca Capello wrote:
> With this mail, however, I would like to comment on using the HKPS
> keyservers.
[...]
> 2) "keyserver hkps://keys.indymedia.org" does not work with the default
> GnuPG in stable:
[...]
> The same in squeeze, but with a different error:
[...]
> It do
On 04/07/2011 03:16 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Registration is now open for DebConf11. For registration instructions,
> please see:
>
>http://debconf11.debconf.org/register.xhtml
perhaps https://penta.debconf.org/ should be updated? It seems to refer
to dc10 right now.
Thanks to everyone for
On 06/09/2011 12:58 PM, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> If doesn't make your day I don't know what will.
>
> Our gold sponsor Mtel has decided to give *every* DebConf11 attendee a
> phone number and package along with it! I got too excited so I'm not
> sure I got it right but I think this is the package the
On 06/09/2011 01:24 PM, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
>> c) if debconf actively encourages the adoption of non-free tools, or
>> actively excludes users who do not adopt non-free tools, it would seem
>> to distance
On 06/09/2011 01:45 PM, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> As I see they will provide a SIM card with a bunch of credits for DC11
> people. Is that too bad? I think it's a good news for DC attendees and
> doesn't deserve complaints :)
I apologize for my knee-jerk response; i did not understand what wa
On 06/09/2011 04:16 PM, Nedim Skenderovic wrote:
> This is a very good deal, since most of people who would come would probably
> buy expandable SIM cards so they can stay in touch with LOCAL TEAM or
> friends for low costs. And this is a free offer that you can accept or not,
> nobody is forcing y
On 07/19/2011 10:53 AM, Vedran Omeragic wrote:
> Yes, Visa and MasterCard, both credit and debit, will work without any
> problems. _However_ ATMs will _only_ accept cards with chips,
I have a chipless (magstripe-only) debit card with a mastercard imprint.
It did not work in the hotel ATM.
Howe
On 07/20/2011 02:26 PM, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> In past DebConfs we have encouraged people to pay waiter/waitress tips even
> regarding sponsored meals. So this is just a reminder :)
>
> Local people say it's normal to pay about 10%. So, something near €0.75 should
> be fine, once each meal
On 07/20/2011 02:57 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> 123+20 (I had two bags) for the bus to BL
Notice that bags you check under the bus (on the zagreb → BL leg)
require an additional fee.
On the bus i took, it was €1 for each under-bus bag, or 8 Kuna
(Croatian) if you didn't have a euro handy.
Hey debconf people--
Lightning Talks!
July 30th (Saturday) at 18:00 in Banski Dvor's main auditorium
Send me your proposal for a 5-minute talk!
Each talk is capped at 5 minutes max, and i'll allow a minute of setup
for speakers who want to use the projector, so we can have 7 lightning
talks total
Just a couple clarifications on reserving the Meeting Room for your event:
On 07/22/2011 04:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The room is called Meeting Room. If you would like to reserve this room
> for an event the procedure is
>
> 1. Register a new event in penta (if you dont have yet)
> 2. P
Hello DebConf11 folks--
The Keysigning event [0] will be this evening, at 9pm in Banski Dvor.
We'll start in the "Meeting Room", and probably move into a larger space
(or outside) in the event that the room is too crowded.
See you there!
--dkg
[0] http://people.debian.org/~anibal/ksp-dc
On 07/26/2011 03:26 PM, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:06:52PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>>> The Keysigning event [0] will be this evening, at 9pm in Banski Dvor.
>>> We'll start in the "Meeting Room", and probably move into a larger space
>>> (or outside) in the event that
On 07/02/2012 09:37 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Customs was not also painless but also quick. Smile, put your bags on
> the belt, smile, take our bags, hand over your custom declarations
> form (where I had checked "no" on all questions), say goodbye.
I was pulled aside at the customs x-ray in MG
Needed: gigabit fiber/copper media converter!
If you are planning on coming to debconf12, and you have (and are
willing to travel with) a gigabit fiber-to-copper media converter, you
would get everlasting fame and fortune, not to mention the undying
gratitude of the masses. You would also get you
Are you at DebConf? Are you looking for an easy way to help? Do you
want to meet people? Do you plan on attending some of the scheduled talks?
We want *you* to sign up to coordinate a talk room for a few talks!
At most this is a commitment for a few hours, which you can fulfill
while attending
Are you at DebConf12? Do you have an idea, an argument, or a project
that you want to present in 5 minutes or less?
Sign up for a lightning talk slot for July 14th at 17:00 in Aula Magna!
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf12/LightningTalks
I'll be coordinating the round, and will be happy to
DebConf12's Mass OpenPGP Keysigning will be at 18:00 on Thursday, July
12 in Roberto Terán (a.k.a. "Talk Room 2"). You can still participate
even if you didn't manage to send your key yet.
We're going to try something a different this time around. Please
bring blank paper, a pen, and a trustwort
On 07/10/2012 05:57 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Until 17:00 on Thursday, there will be a keysigning document in
> gobby.debian.org at:
>
> DebConf12/dc12-ksp
To clarify -- you'll need to access gobby.debian.org with a recent gobby
client. Please make sure you have ei
On 07/19/2012 04:10 PM, Luca Capello wrote:
>>> I would have objected to this kind of keysigning for the last part,
>>> because it means that people who does not have a computer capable of
>>> "wireless" power (i.e. no AC power) can not participate.
fwiw, there were a handful of power strips in th
On 08/12/2013 06:17 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
> Could future debconfs simply reserve N vegetarian and vegan meals for
> those who do not eat meat, but allow some for omnivores to choose if
> desired, too?
as a vegan who is happy to help omnivores choose vegetarian meals when
they feel like it, i would be
hi debconfers--
Are you interested in opportunistic, configuration-free encryption as a
countermeasure to pervasive monitoring? have you looked at tcpcrypt?
http://tcpcrypt.org/
a few of us are meeting in the 2nd floor hacklab tomorrow (sunday) at
15:30 to talk about tcpcrypt in debian, what i
Hi all--
On 08/23/2014 08:43 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Are you interested in opportunistic, configuration-free encryption as a
> countermeasure to pervasive monitoring? have you looked at tcpcrypt?
>
> http://tcpcrypt.org/
I've been asked to move the tcpcrypt discuss
On 08/31/2014 05:31 AM, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
>First person to be ghostified was Daniel Gillmor (reported
>at 2014-08-26 18h49m, before completing 4 hours playing).
What is my prize for being the first ghostified? (Other than using that
opportunity to sow confusion and m
On 08/25/2014 12:43 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:46:13PM -0700, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On 08/23/2014 08:43 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>>> Are you interested in opportunistic, configuration-free encryption as a
>>> countermeasu
On 09/10/2014 05:56 PM, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> PS: Asking people who do not want to be photographed to wear bright
> colours is somewhat counter-intuitive...
You could have the happy-with-photography lanyards be bright colors, and
hand out dark or black lanyards for the people who have not opte
On 09/10/2014 08:16 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> that would take extra days of my work for no good reason.
i understand that it's extra work, but i don't understand why it's "no
good reason" -- we're trying to respect people who are signalling (via
e.g. a black lanyard) that they would rather no
On 09/14/2014 12:45 PM, micah anderson wrote:
> A few examples,
[...good examples snipped...]
And then there are people who usually are OK with having their picture
taken, but at any given time decide that they just don't feel like it
right now.
If, for whatever reason, someone doesn't want to
On Tue 2015-08-04 03:59:16 -0400, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> | I can think of no good reason to be including these keys in the DC14
> | keysigning and in fact believe that it is actively harmful for us to be
> | encouraging people to continue propagating the use of 1024 bit keys. I
> | hope that al
On Sat 2015-08-15 20:00:29 +0200, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On 15/08/2015 5:08 PM, "Sven Bartscher"
> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately I arrived after that. Is there any other opportunity,
>> to compare the hash, in sight?
>
> Look for dkg or me to compare the hash.
Or, come to the live demo lig
On Sat 2015-08-15 23:16:32 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is only a valid proxy if you and the people you're exchanging keys with
> are present for the *same* display of the checksum and confirm that it
> matches. Otherwise, it's just another example of that sketchy dkg character
> trying to
On Mon 2016-06-27 13:46:16 -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:12:42PM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>
>> https://debian-administration.org/users/dkg/weblog/97
>
> He makes some valid points, but that doesn't necessarily mean we should
> drop comments in lists of ke
On Wed 2017-07-26 18:38:27 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:23:20PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
>> Or should gpgsigs be fixed to ignore comments?
>
> No, not in a million years.
I agree with Wouter that comments should not be ignored.
> Comments have reason. There a
58 matches
Mail list logo
