Re: [deal.II] Installing extra packages inside docker container of dealii

t; Luca > > On 20 Feb 2017, at 12:47, Sebastian.Gonzalez-Pintor > wrote: > > Hi Luca! > > I have tried and I do not know what I am missing. I have a makefile like > this > > all: build > > build: > docker build -t new-dealii . > > and the Dockerfile as

Re: [deal.II] Installing extra packages inside docker container of dealii

: > > Yes. > > You should write a Dockefile with your instructions. See, for example, the > Dockefile for deal2lkit (github). > > Luca > > On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:58, Sebastian.Gonzalez-Pintor > wrote: > > > Hello! > > I am trying with the docker

[deal.II] Installing extra packages inside docker container of dealii

Hello! I am trying with the docker containers of dealii, so I downloaded one of them and then I ran it $ docker pull dealii/dealii:v8.4.2-gcc-mpi-fulldepsmanual-debugrelease $ docker run -i -t dealii/dealii:v8.4.2-gcc-mpi-fulldepsmanual-debugrelease Now I want to install few things in the cont

Re: [deal.II] Re: Who is owning the instance in an exception raised by Subscriptor?

dea was to have a common instance for geometrical and computational > mesh handling. > > Best > Uwe > > On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 12:53:42 PM UTC+1, > Sebastian.Gonzalez-Pintor wrote: >> >> Hi Uwe! >> >> I have been thinking, and the proble

Re: [deal.II] Re: Who is owning the instance in an exception raised by Subscriptor?

there could be more of these dependences. I will take care, and if necessary I will explicitly force the clean up with `del`. Thank you very much! Sebas. El miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017, 14:11:22 (UTC+1), Bruno Turcksin escribió: > > 2017-02-15 6:53 GMT-05:00 Sebastian.Gonzalez-

Re: [deal.II] Re: Who is owning the instance in an exception raised by Subscriptor?

Hi Jean-Paul, I could not find the way to change the title. I guess that something like "Avoid exception raised by Subscriptor when interfacing with python". I will wait a bit more before marking the correct answer, in case I get something better and we can have a more complete answer (I am sti

Re: [deal.II] Re: Who is owning the instance in an exception raised by Subscriptor?

7 at 4:21:00 PM UTC+1, Bruno Turcksin wrote: >> >> 2017-02-14 10:13 GMT-05:00 Sebastian.Gonzalez-Pintor : >> >> > I am doing some reading about this now. I do not have explicit >> destructors >> > neither in c++ nor in python, so I want to be carefull that I

Re: [deal.II] Re: Who is owning the instance in an exception raised by Subscriptor?

tes, 14 de febrero de 2017, 16:21:00 (UTC+1), Bruno Turcksin escribió: > > 2017-02-14 10:13 GMT-05:00 Sebastian.Gonzalez-Pintor >: > > I am doing some reading about this now. I do not have explicit > destructors > > neither in c++ nor in python, so I want to be carefull

Re: [deal.II] Re: Who is owning the instance in an exception raised by Subscriptor?

Bruno, I am doing some reading about this now. I do not have explicit destructors neither in c++ nor in python, so I want to be carefull that I can define the destructors to add the cout without changing the what the destructor would do the work. Thanks for the hint. Best, Sebas. > -- The

[deal.II] Re: Who is owning the instance in an exception raised by Subscriptor?

troyed before the DoFHandler. > > Best, > > Bruno > > On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 8:35:10 AM UTC-5, > Sebastian.Gonzalez-Pintor wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello! I am using swig to parse some code that I have wrote, and this >> code uses dealii. When

[deal.II] Who is owning the instance in an exception raised by Subscriptor?

Hello! I am using swig to parse some code that I have wrote, and this code uses dealii. When I run the code with python, I get an error raised by Subscriptor as follows An error occurred in line <114> of file in function virtual dea