shows the bottom frame is defined as 2x the theight of the top:
Which is what I'm seeing on the following OS X browsers:
Moz 1.3
Moz 3/29
Camino 3/27
Safari
IE 5.2.2
This looks INVALID to me.
reporter, can you please attach scrren shots of what you think is "right" and
"wrong&
with the /proc filesystem at all.
Can that easily be done?
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
.
symlink to the executable whose name or
location varies with the version-number.
Given that its purpose is to locate what executable file one will use in
a particular environment, should not 'which' resolve the symlink and
return its target?
What would happen on *nix?
--
David A. C
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:23:13PM -0400, David A. Cobb wrote:
Recently, I was trying to do "strace Xemacs . . ."
First I got a "No such file" error, so I changed to do "strace `which
xemacs` " -- still a failure.
which xemacs returns
a big deal to have the various setup scripts send their
output to, say, /var/log/setup/SCRIPTNAME.log?
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On 16 Oct 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:11, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>
>>
>>>David A. Cobb wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Would it be a big deal to have the various setup
uot; but I don't know how good an idea that is.
Any other alternattives? Is sort the only issue? -- I never use MS
sort, I could always rename it.
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." --
10:49 EST 2003
Shared id: cygwin1S3
bash-2.05b $ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
ba
age seems to exhibit the problem.
Any ideas?
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
Pilgrim: R.French, Tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software!
--
Unsubscr
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
I know that problems with Xfree86-cygwin have a list of their own, but I
think this may be a packaging problem or something super-weird about my
Cygwin installation.
Lately, XFree86-prog is showing up among the packages to be
tside the source tree - I know it
sometimes matters.
Configure shows nothing exciting. [log attached]
Make gets into a loop in subdirectory W11 ! Unlimited recursive makes here.
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my act
gs out of
/usr/doc? As things stand, it isn't easy to know where to look! And my
$INFOPATH is probably abgevukkett.
Thanks,
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
P
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:28:14PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
* David A. Cobb (2003-11-27 17:54 +0100)
My configure/make score is just barely above zero. I'd be sure it was
all me if it was indeed
em type... i686-pc-cygwin
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe
checking if the linker (/usr/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe) is GNU ld... yes
checking for /usr/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe option to reload object
files... -r
[snip]
David A. Cobb wrote:
My configure/make score is just b
GCC... /usr/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe
checking if the linker (/usr/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe) is GNU ld... yes
checking for /usr/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe option to reload object
files... -r
[snip]
David A. Cobb wrote:
My configure/make score is just barely above zero. I'd be sure it
was all
Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
Next experiment is to cd into the source tree to do the build: the
example does show "./configure".
THIS IS STILL A BUG! Building from inside is, in fact, discouraged,
IIRC, in the Autotools
I figured there was some likelihood they weren't correctly installed the
previous time.
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
Pilgrim: R.French, Tr.
Life is too short to toler
Brian Ford wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
I couldn't find this in the archives, but the two packages gcc-core &
gcc-testsuite, which are distinguished by being source-only,
never get registered as "installed." Setup has now re-installed them
about 6 time
e critical information.
I'm less sure about this piece -- most use things like InstallShield and
I don't know how the scripting works there.
Of course, if they simply looked at the mount point
/HKLM/Cyg.../Cygwin/mounts_v2/bin, they could work it all out!!!
--
David A. Cobb, Software
they are simply not being seen.
Of course, I can unzip them - but why use up the space if info can do it
dynamically.
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
Pilgrim: R.Fren
x27;ll
try to take a look at it this week.
M f G,
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
Pilgrim: R.French, Tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software!
-
-- then put a link
in `/usr/bin'.
Similarly, the associated binaries could well be in the same directory
with the executable.
And the DOC and whatever data files in `/usr/share/$EMACSVERSION/etc'.
Finally, a `/etc/profile.d/xemacs.sh' script to set up $EMACSPATH =>
,
$EMACSDAT
such as
"the Cygwin list isn't really a good place for general *nix questions.
Some better places for those are and .
Second, where can I read up on the design semantics of *nix "shared
object" (.so) libraries, and how they differ from M$ .dll's?
Thanks,
-
t;F:/Cygwin/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts"
"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts"'' then finds that the "parent" of the
current directory is not where it came from , and it is unable to pop
its way back up the tree.
I rather doubt this is the Posix behavior.
--
David A. Cobb, Softw
e or directory
508 $ strace "xemacs -debug-init -debug-paths 2>~/.xemacs/startup.log"
strace.exe: error creating process xemacs -debug-init -debug-paths
2>~/.xemacs/startup.log, (error 2)
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:24:19PM -0500, David A. Cobb wrote:
Perhaps the problem is whether strace likes cygwin paths, or wants
Windoze paths:
Nope. The problem is a cockpit error.
Urm, no great surprise!
506 $ touch ~/.xemacs/strace.out
507 $ strace
dowing mode, i.e. it uses the rxvt terminal window.
Now, that's not really terrible. I prefer the graphical but this does
work.
But even so, there is a glitch here. When I exit the Xemacs, the rxvt
session gets closed -- my whole login session is gone.
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, P
screenshot "man man"
(d) screenshot "pinfo man"
The screenshots were created in .png format by the Gimp v2.0-pre.
possibilities that occur to me: something not so good in terminfo or
in my .Xdefaults
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Gr
invalid or future time,"
Norton just complains.
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
.
n of FAT32
filesystem timestamps is 2-sec (vice 1-sec or less on a *Nix box) For
XEmacs, that could also be why installed *.el files appear newer than
*.elc files. Ummm - maybe that doesn't make sense either; maybe fixing
the invalid dates causes that secondary problem.
--
David A. Cobb
nux-i386.bin file in
> /usr/my/java/ directory in my machine (Fermi).
Are you saying (or suggesting) that jre--linux-i386 works on the Cygwin
platform? 'Twould be nice, but hard to believe.
>
>
>
> Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have the JDK 1.4 release ava
s pretty damn close to "correct."
Sadly, I have only noticed the problem while in the midst of a disk
scan. The scan programs don't tell me what they see, only that they
find it invalid. Next time it happens I'll tell the scanner to ignore
the problem so I can examine it
I read that gcc 3.1 is currently at "phase 3 (bugfix)" with a target
date of 4/15 (?).
Is work in progress using the available sources to have a 3.1 port
to the Cygwin platform some time reasonably soon?
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By G
001218-1?
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." --
The Way of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/m
e to do a more thorough survey to see if a simple
minded algorithm would catch all the cases.
>
>
>Jan.
>
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
Pilgri
2.95 stable version, it would be very desirable to have
setup.ini changed to advance "3.2" to the [current] status of "gcc".
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner."
( Testing whether gcc understands Ada
no ). failed.
My first thought was "of course, it doesn't unerstand Cygwin paths."
But, if that were true it should have failed completely on C, C++, and
F77 as well.
SO, if Dockeen, or anyone, can point me in the direction of creating a
Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
>It can be done. I have a working (or so it seems) GNAT for cygwin.
>
>Let me know if you are interested.
>
_Very interested_ . Thanks.. What do I need to do?
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: David A. Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
===
checking whether basename is declared... yes
= But see above 'checking
for basename'
checking whether getopt is declared... no
===^^^^ We do have one, don't we?
checking whether
Chris,
After two months without a connection -- and with serious withdrawal
symptoms -- I am back hanging from the wires. I'm sure I've been
suspended because of the bounces when I first failed. Would you kindly
reset my list memberships to active? Thanks!
David A. Cobb
--
U
. David's server
couldn't bear much traffic but there were some offers of other sites.
Are the binaries available on-line at this time?
Thanks,
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner." --
and Ada code to test run the Ada
compiler?
Gerrit
I have an /unreasonable/ amount of time. Ada code - I can write it, I
can also go download the conformance tests (I think).
MfG,
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by
future?
Thanks
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a
Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
.
--
Unsubscribe info: http:
ec. CPU, dpkg-deb about 2, find about 2, everything else less
than 1.
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner."
-- The Way of a Pilgrim: R.French, Tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
David A. Cobb wrote:
++rm.exe< getting 98% of the CPU time and not making any
progress. Watching the handles display, I see an open handle on what
must be the first *.deb file found so I'm pretty sure of the "no
progress -= stuck!" diagnosis.
If
l's such as User32.dll have their own little event-loop.
MY CYGCHECK OUTPUT exceeds my mail host's size limit (5Mb) and the
zipped version is refused by your server. Anyway, I'm up-to-date as
of 2004-08-12.
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God
27;E --72-->
** mailing list preference; please keep replies on list **
-- printf("LocalTime: UTC+%02d\n",(DST)? 2:1); --
--END OF MESSAGE--
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
te it from your computer.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Acce
partition where the database lives is FAT32 -- it needs to be
because it is also visible from my Linux dual-boot.
I know permissions on a FAT32 volume are, at best, faked. But IMHO it
shouldn't incur this sort of error.
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By
ppropriate set of CCFLAG settings select the Cygwin-MinGW compiler?
Or, is some other "trick" needed so that "gcc" means using the MinGW
compiler?
--
David A. Cobb -- computing t-rex
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http:/
On 2015-09-05 02:59, Takashi Yano wrote:
Hi Corinna,
Is there any progress regarding this problem?
I recently encountered the same situation. After some trials,
I found this problem occurs if the account, on which cygwin
setup is executed, is a Microsoft account. This does not occur
if the acco
On 2015-09-10 12:07, Ken Brown wrote:
On 9/10/2015 11:49 AM, David A Cobb wrote:
On a Windows-10 host: when I use Cygwin *chown***or *chmod *to make
permission changes, the next time I access the folder-tree from Windows
Explorer Security tab, it complains that the Access Control List is
I see the Git Repo for "the core Cygwin libraries and utilities (Cygwin
and Newlib)" @ sourceware.com.
I am looking at possible work within *COREUTILS*. Obviously, there are
significant deltas /versus/ GNU Upstream.
Can you point me to the active repo for coreutils?
Just to save net traffic,
On 2015-09-10 17:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 10/09/2015 22:40, David A Cobb wrote:
I see the Git Repo for "the core Cygwin libraries and utilities (Cygwin
and Newlib)" @ sourceware.com.
I am looking at possible work within *COREUTILS*. Obviously, there are
significant deltas /v
On 2015-09-10 19:31, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/10/2015 05:20 PM, David A Cobb wrote:
Not a problem. My first patch to upstream coreutils was done exactly
in that manner.
And, suppose for the moment, some of the changes are only relevant to
the Windows platform. I don't (yet) know how muc
55 matches
Mail list logo
