objective of cygwin?
goals of cygwin?
result?
concludion ?
achievement of cygwin?
_
Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft®
SmartScreen Technology.
http://join.msn.com/?p
On Jul 1 08:01, Syed Noor Ali wrote:
>
> objective of cygwin?
Fun for the spectators, revenue from the perimeter advertising
> goals of cygwin?
1:0 in the 23 minute
> result?
2:3 after play-off
> concludion ?
1 Million Euro for the center forward
>achievement of cygwin
Dear Timothy and Other all,
I have the same question as in the title. While I
tried to install ns-2.27 or ns-2.28 in cygwin,
resource unavailable happens randomly in the middle of
installation. Sometimes in Tk installation and
sometimes in TCLCL installation. Each has its own
Makefile. I really co
Dear Cygwin and Ns-2:
I always suffered "Bash Fork Resource Temporily
Unavailable More" while I tried to install Ns-2.27 in
Cygwin, it shows below, I have attached makefile of
TCLCL-1.15. However, while I installed Ns2.27 in
Cygwin in April 2004, everything went very well, and I
never had problem
Dear Cygwin and Ns-2:
I always suffered "Bash Fork Resource Temporily
Unavailable More" while I tried to install Ns-2.27 in
Cygwin, it shows below, I have attached makefile of
TCLCL-1.15. However, while I installed Ns2.27 in
Cygwin in April 2004, everything went very well, and I
never had problem
Original Message
>From: Gerrit P. Haase
>Sent: 30 June 2005 21:09
> Ok, I try to build a Cygwin application that requires CAPI functions
> which are installed with the drivers for an ISDN card, the DLL is named
> capi2032.dll, I have an import library which comes from the manufacturer
> AV
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Dave,
So why does the compiler creats a reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
is it the linker who wants to resolve CAPI_INSTALLED with @0 attached.
Has the definition of APIENTRY has changed between the mfr's build from
which the import library came and the build from
I would suggest you get the O'Reilly bash
book, and read your way through that. What you
are running into are syntax problems.
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Han Nguyen wrote:
>New to Unix, so please have patience.
>I understand that I should be able to type
>set food = pickle
>echo
INFO
New upstream release of epstool:3.08 2005-06-10
Fix Unix-like makefiles to work with non-GNU make.
Install CSS file gsview.css.
Added --ignore-information to ignore DSC parser information messages.
Fixed handling of --ignore-warnings and --ignore-errors so that these are now
required
> Maybe a better question would be, "Why do you feel it would not be
> possible?" Every Cygwin binary package is compiled from source by the
> maintainer (obviously) and includes a -src package that should build
> cleanly, else there's a packaging problem. So in that sense you can
> build everyth
I got things working. Thanks for your help.
On 6/29/05, Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 05:25 PM 6/29/2005, you wrote:
> >Imran Merali wrote:
> >
> >> I am trying to get cron to execute a bash script at a certain time,
> >> but it is not doing so. The script itself works well, but it do
Tony Karakashian wrote:
Fortunately, most of the hard work has been done for existing
packages. A CFS "book" would simply require compiling instructions in
one place as well as patches, etc. Could be a fun project.
Basically I do nothing but building from scratch. That is the reason
why I b
--- "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please add a GhostScript CFAX device for SFF output
>
> This patch adds the option for the CFAX device to GhostScript.
> You need it to produce raw fax files (SFF):
>
> http://www.shellbang.org/files/ghostscript-gnu-cfax.diff
Thanks Gerrit for t
> If there are problems building a new package, the first resource is LFS
> or BLFS of course, what else? So besides LFS is missing some basic
> Cygwin packages it is already the best guide available when building new
> packages. Just rename it;)
Hehehe, precisely what I do, too. I figure they'
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 08:01:50AM +, Syed Noor Ali wrote:
>objective of cygwin?
First do no harm.
>goals of cygwin?
1. Cygwin may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a
human being to come to harm.
2. Cygwin must obey orders given it by human beings except where su
Rajesh Balakrishnan wrote:
--- "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please add a GhostScript CFAX device for SFF output
This patch adds the option for the CFAX device to GhostScript.
You need it to produce raw fax files (SFF):
http://www.shellbang.org/files/ghostscript-gnu-cfax.diff
René Berber wrote:
> Yu-Cheng Chou wrote:
>
>> I installed sshd as a system service on windows xp,
>> but I can't connect to this ssh server through ssh.
>> The firewall has been turned off.
>
> By that you mean an external firewall?
>
>> The sshd is listening to port 22.
>> But when I tried to
At 05:27 AM 7/1/2005, you wrote:
>checking which kind of 64-bit int to use... long long
>C:\CYGWIN\bin\sh.exe (62888): *** thread handle not
>set - 0x0<0x0>, Win32 error
>1450
>C:\CYGWIN\bin\sh.exe (62896): *** thread handle not
>set - 0x0<0x0>, Win32 error
>1450
>C:\CYGWIN\bin\sh.exe (62888): ***
At 11:27 AM 7/1/2005, you wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 08:01:50AM +, Syed Noor Ali wrote:
>>objective of cygwin?
>
> First do no harm.
>
>>goals of cygwin?
>
> 1. Cygwin may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a
> human being to come to harm.
>
> 2. Cygwin must obey ord
Will Parsons wrote:
[snip]
>>If the answer to my above question is yes, then you have to enable sshd use of
>>port 22 on Windows XP's own firewall. Otherwise, I don't know, but
>>"connection
>>refused" means something is listening on that port and refusing connections so
>
>
> I think "connecti
René Berber wrote:
> Will Parsons wrote:
> [snip]
>>>If the answer to my above question is yes, then you have to enable sshd use
>>>of
>>>port 22 on Windows XP's own firewall. Otherwise, I don't know, but
>>>"connection
>>>refused" means something is listening on that port and refusing connectio
Syed Noor Ali wrote:
objective of cygwin?
goals of cygwin?
What's the difference between a goal and an objective?
Cygwin's objective: Total World Domination!
result?
Almost there (we just need to convince you! The others are already our
zombies!)
concludion ?
Don't
Original Message
>From: Will Parsons
>Sent: 01 July 2005 17:35
> René Berber wrote:
>> Will Parsons wrote:
>> [snip]
If the answer to my above question is yes, then you have to enable
sshd use of port 22 on Windows XP's own firewall. Otherwise, I don't
know, but "connection
Question NS wrote:
[SNIP]
You're not by any chance using make with the -j option, are you?
/Lasse
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
At the risk of ruining all the fun...
Syed Noor Ali wrote:
objective of cygwin?
To emulate UNIX under Windows.
goals of cygwin?
To emulate UNIX under Windows.
result?
It emulates UNIX under Windows.
concludion ?
Does not compute: 'concludion'.
achievement of
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Lasse wrote:
> At the risk of ruining all the fun...
Not at all, yours was funny too. :-)
A few small corrections, though.
> Syed Noor Ali wrote:
>
> > objective of cygwin?
>
> To emulate UNIX under Windows.
To provide a POSIX emulation layer under Windows.
> > goal
Dave Korn wrote:
[snip]
> "Connection refused" has a very precise meaning: it means that in response
> to the outbound SYN packet, the remote host returned a RST instead of a
> SYN/ACK. This happens when the port in question is closed - nothing
> listening - but *not* firewalled. A firewalled p
Original Message
>From: René Berber
>Sent: 01 July 2005 18:37
> Dave Korn wrote:
> [snip]
>> "Connection refused" has a very precise meaning: it means that in
>> response to the outbound SYN packet, the remote host returned a RST
>> instead of a SYN/ACK. This happens when the port in qu
Question NS wrote:
> I always suffered "Bash Fork Resource Temporily
> Unavailable More" while I tried to install Ns-2.27 in
> Cygwin, it shows below, I have attached makefile of
Try using the 2.x version of bash. I experienced similar errors with
bash 3.x during large configure/build scripts, a
Dear Larry,
Thank you for you suggestion, I installed Latest
Cygwin DLL release version is 1.5.17-1. Now I got
cygcheck.out and attach it for your review, I am
looking forward to your reply. By the way, I have
installed cygwin in April 2004, no problems. The
trouble came out when I reinstalled it
My tests indicated that the changes are working correctly.
Peter
On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:23 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
We're coming close to a 1.5.18 release. Please try the latest snapshot
at http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ and help verify that there are no
regresions against 1.5.17.
I'm part
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:09:21PM -0700, Peter Rehley wrote:
>My tests indicated that the changes are working correctly.
You did try the snapshot, right? I neglected to mention that I had to
make some corresponding changes to the DLL beyond the below changes.
I don't know exactly when I did that
Hi, all,
While I restart cygwin after I failed to install
NS2.27 or NS2.28, it shows,
bash: /usr/bin/id: Resource temporarily unavailable
6 [main] bash 62528 fork_parent: child 62624
died waiting for longjmp befo
re initialization
bash: fork: Bad file descriptor
Then I restarted it, it show
Question NS wrote:
> Your help is appreciated!
If you want help so badly, why did you just ignore everything that Larry
said in his reply? He specifically told you two things: post cygcheck
output, and try a snapshot. I suggested in a previous reply that you
try bash-2.05b-17. Have you done an
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew DeFaria
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 11:44 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: plz answer these questions about Cygwin
[snip]
> > concludion ?
>
> Don't know. That's not even a word
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:21:20PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:09:21PM -0700, Peter Rehley wrote:
>>My tests indicated that the changes are working correctly.
>
>You did try the snapshot, right? I neglected to mention that I had to
>make some corresponding changes
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
>
> I have gotten to the point where I am seeing reproducible crashes in a
> plain debugging version of bash inside gdb, but that the problem appears
> to be malloc'd memory corruption (I hate those bugs - they are so hard to
> pinpoint). I now have to attempt to buil
Yeah, I tried the June 30th snapshot.
On Jul 1, 2005, at 1:21 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:09:21PM -0700, Peter Rehley wrote:
My tests indicated that the changes are working correctly.
You did try the snapshot, right? I neglected to mention that I had to
make some
Brendan Kehoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thoughts?
I guess this check is causing more trouble than it cures.
> Oh, one thing that's got me mystified is that such a problem like not
> configuring in a directory 'foo bar' could possibly be a real
> outstanding bug, since it'd have to have happe
39 matches
Mail list logo
