> If there are problems building a new package, the first resource is LFS > or BLFS of course, what else? So besides LFS is missing some basic > Cygwin packages it is already the best guide available when building new > packages. Just rename it;)
Hehehe, precisely what I do, too. I figure they've generally hammered out most of the rough edges. Heck, if for no other reason than you get a list of everything that needs to be installed before you can assemble a package, it's a godsend. > BTW, do you know which was the last version of gcc which could be build > without having gcc already handy? Honestly, no. Been a while since I built an LFS. I've pretty much given up on Linux in general, so that's why I've been concentrating on Cygwin... -T -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
