> I haven't looked at it recently, but I really doubt that the code would
> deal with the stabs symbol table that gcc/gas/ld use and allow symbolic
> representation of symbols.
My code certainly doesn't, it only deals with basic Win32. You get
symbols for addresses only if imagehlp library can g
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:37:24PM +0200, Lassi A. Tuura wrote:
>There's been code in MSJ (Microsoft Systems Journal) ages ago by Matt
>Pietrek, in several articles. Do a google search for "Pietrek
>stackwalk" for instance.
>
>http://iguana.cern.ch/lxr/source/IGUANA/src/Ig_Imports/classlib/src/de
There's been code in MSJ (Microsoft Systems Journal) ages ago by Matt
Pietrek, in several articles. Do a google search for "Pietrek
stackwalk" for instance.
http://iguana.cern.ch/lxr/source/IGUANA/src/Ig_Imports/classlib/src/debug.cxx#1099
has stack trace code you can use on a large number of sy
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Horn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 1:37 AM
> p.s. Do you consider me fish? As I have nipples, I'd rather
> be referred to a mammal.
Hans, the references to fish in this list are not suggesting that anyone
is a fish, but
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 06:37:23AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
>p.s. Do you consider me fish? As I have nipples, I'd rather be
>referred to a mammal.
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?method=and&sort=time&restrict=%2Fml%2Fcygwin%2F&exclude=&words=fish+teach
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://c
Dear Chris,
this looks like it would take more like a hardcore system programmer to do,
rather than naive me.
In any case, I'm very grateful that you have taken so much of your precious
time to respond to my posting.
thanks a lot
Hans
p.s. Do you consider me fish? As I have nipples, I'd rather
Hi Hans,
I sometimes manually lookup like:
$ gdb foo.exe
l *0xdeadbeef
Bye, Heribert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Freitag, 29. März 2002 05:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: stacktrace from withn an exec upon
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:05:32PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>For the record, I don't know anything about what is required to
>interface with bfd. I'm offering this information so that Robert
Randall
>Schulz won't accuse me of bei
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 07:40:03PM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
>I just tried Chris' little test and got: something like this:
Wow, hens' teeth prevail.
>This however, is of little help (at least not to me).
>
>What I had in mind, though, was to get a list of the function names
>(demangled of course)
Dear all,
I just tried Chris' little test and got: something like this:
Stack trace:
Frame Function Args
0022FE84 00401073 (00401244, , 0022FEA4, 00401063)
0022FE94 00401073 (610A0368, 0001, 0022FEB4, 00401054)
0022FEA4 00401063 (00D0, , 0022FF10, 61003F42)
0022
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:46:52PM -0800, Richard Hitt wrote:
>Is it unreasonable to find appalling the suggestion to use an
>undocumented function?
Are you volunteering to write documentation?
That would be great! We really need someone to work on documentation! It
seems that people frequently
Is it unreasonable to find appalling the suggestion to use an
undocumented function?
Richard
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:17:51 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:44:27AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
>>where does cygwin_stackdump() live?
>>I searched through the entire cygwin inst tree, but cou
Chris,
I'm sorry.
I missed that suggestion.
But I do enjoy jumping through hoops at times.
Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA
At 17:06 2002-03-28, you wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:32:36PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >If you're going to take the time to respond, the least you cou
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:32:36PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>If you're going to take the time to respond, the least you could do is
>give a useful answer.
>
>Since unlike Chris, I do not know the answer, I'll illustrate how I
>discovered it.
>
>[snip]
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 05:17:51PM -050
Chris,
If you're going to take the time to respond, the least you could do is give
a useful answer.
Since unlike Chris, I do not know the answer, I'll illustrate how I
discovered it.
Hans is correct that there is no prototype for this function in any file
under /usr/include, though there i
At 06:05 PM 3/28/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:13:15PM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
> >I'm afraid not, as I do not know what files to #include so the runtime will
> >find cygwin_stackdump().
>
>I guess you're out of luck then.
A shadowy apparition appears, shrouded in a
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:13:15PM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
>I'm afraid not, as I do not know what files to #include so the runtime will
>find cygwin_stackdump().
I guess you're out of luck then.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http:/
Chris,
I'm afraid not, as I do not know what files to #include so the runtime will
find cygwin_stackdump().
H.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:44:27AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
>where does cygwin_stackdump() live?
>I searched through the entire cygwin inst tree, but couldn't find any header
>where it is defined.
>
>If it is a function I just invoke, where does it write the trace dump to?
>stdout? stderr?
I sugge
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:30:39AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
>is there a way to create (and print) a procedure traceback from within an
>executable that is invoked upon error condition?
>This is possible on many other platforms.
>I've read about strace, but that seems to be not what I want, as to my
At 10:17 AM 3/28/2002, Hans Horn wrote:
>Thanks a lot.
>But I'm sorry - I've never dealt with the Win32 API. Don't you have to join
>Micro$haft in order to access the MSDN site?
>H.
No, I didn't. Try http://msdn.microsoft.com/library. Poke around and see
what you can find. Hm, try looking st
Thanks a lot.
But I'm sorry - I've never dealt with the Win32 API. Don't you have to join
Micro$haft in order to access the MSDN site?
H.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin
At 09:30 AM 3/28/2002, Hans Horn wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>is there a way to create (and print) a procedure traceback from within an
>executable that is invoked upon error condition?
>This is possible on many other platforms.
>I've read about strace, but that seems to be not what I want, as to my
>unde
Dear all,
is there a way to create (and print) a procedure traceback from within an
executable that is invoked upon error condition?
This is possible on many other platforms.
I've read about strace, but that seems to be not what I want, as to my
understanding the executable needs to be run under
24 matches
Mail list logo
