Chris,
I'm sorry.
I missed that suggestion.
But I do enjoy jumping through hoops at times.
Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA
At 17:06 2002-03-28, you wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:32:36PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >If you're going to take the time to respond, the least you could do is
> >give a useful answer.
> >
> >Since unlike Chris, I do not know the answer, I'll illustrate how I
> >discovered it.
> >
> >[snip]
>
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 05:17:51PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >I suggest that you write a simple test file and run it. That would
> >probably answer all of your questions.
>
>e.g.,
>
> % cat > tst.c
> int
> main (int argc, char **argv)
> {
> cygwin_stackdump ();
> }
> ^D
> % gcc -o tst.exe tst.c
> % ./tst.exe
> (stack dump output)
> % ./tst.exe 2>/dev/null
> (no stack dump output)
>
>Since you seem to assume that I know the answer, one would have to wonder
>why you wouldn't try what I suggested before jumping through hoops.
>
>cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
