On Apr 17 10:07, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> I'm having a little trouble with the db_home: setting at work
> (corporate network, not using /etc/passwd or /etc/group). Regarding:
>
> https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-mapping-nsswitch-home
>
> I tried "db_home: /%H" and although my
Looks like this is now covered, but I'd still be happy to proofread
and/or edit for spelling, grammar and for clarity by someone not
intimately familiar with cygwin internals.
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Abel"
To: the list
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 10:05
put me at number 10 on your list. If you don't get a number 1-9, I
suppose I am it.
Jay
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:18 AM
Subject: NTSEC documentation
Is anybody here with a developer background, who likes
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Dave Korn wrote:
> (Plus I don't have any irc software installed...)
FYI, naim comes with an IRC client (called 'nirc').
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZ
On 08 January 2007 14:12, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 8 08:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:53:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>
>>> Other than that, bug me in PM if you think something's maybe not correct
>>> anymore.
>>
>> Would this be a good use of the
On Jan 8 08:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:53:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jan 8 12:29, Dave Korn wrote:
> >> On 08 January 2007 10:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>
> >> > Is anybody here with a developer background, who likes writing
> >> > documentation
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:53:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jan 8 12:29, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 08 January 2007 10:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>> > Is anybody here with a developer background, who likes writing
>> > documentation?
>> >
>> > If so, would this person be interested in
On Jan 8 12:29, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 08 January 2007 10:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Is anybody here with a developer background, who likes writing
> > documentation?
> >
> > If so, would this person be interested in revamping the NTSEC
> > documentation with my input? It shows its age, m
On 08 January 2007 10:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Is anybody here with a developer background, who likes writing
> documentation?
>
> If so, would this person be interested in revamping the NTSEC
> documentation with my input? It shows its age, my lacking knowledge of
> the english language an
On 22 April 2006 22:59, Robert Thomas beau Hayes Link wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:52:41PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Do you mean some magical force siezes control of your body and stops you
>> from typing every time you go to enter the word "chmod"?
> Thanks for your tongue-in-cheek tong
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:52:41PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> Do you mean some magical force siezes control of your body and stops you
> from typing every time you go to enter the word "chmod"?
Thanks for your tongue-in-cheek tongue-lashing. I'll spend some time
getting my head around cygcheck an
On 22 April 2006 05:51, Robert Thomas beau Hayes Link wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've poked around in the faqs and other docs but have not been able to
> solve my proble, which is that for the first time in serveral cygwin
> installs I a not able to chmod 755 any of my files.
Do you mean some mag
At 05:23 PM 9/22/2003, Chris Rodgers you wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:35:20PM +0100, Chris Rodgers wrote:
>> > OK. Here is an example of the way permissions leak out to "Everyone". I
>> > create a new file, with no permissions granted to "other". Cygwin shows
>this
>> > to have worked OK. Y
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:35:20PM +0100, Chris Rodgers wrote:
> > OK. Here is an example of the way permissions leak out to "Everyone". I
> > create a new file, with no permissions granted to "other". Cygwin shows
this
> > to have worked OK. Yet in actual fact there is an ACL there giving
Everyo
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:35:20PM +0100, Chris Rodgers wrote:
> OK. Here is an example of the way permissions leak out to "Everyone". I
> create a new file, with no permissions granted to "other". Cygwin shows this
> to have worked OK. Yet in actual fact there is an ACL there giving Everyone
> som
OK. Here is an example of the way permissions leak out to "Everyone". I
create a new file, with no permissions granted to "other". Cygwin shows this
to have worked OK. Yet in actual fact there is an ACL there giving Everyone
some access rights. I usually choose not to have "Everyone" authorised to
At 07:58 AM 9/15/2003, Chris Rodgers you wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have hunted on the web for a while trying to find a solution, but to no
>avail. If any of you can help me, I'd appreciate it.
>
>I am using Cygwin on Windows 2000 with the NTsec permissions enabled on an
>NTFS volume. My problem is that some
during remote acess. There has
> been some insight on what the problem seems to be in regards to the
> version of Cygwin. My question is regards to a immediate work-around
> this permissions issue with inetd/xinetd ?
>
> Thanks everyone for taking the time in looking into this issue.
>
Cygwin. My question is
regards to
a immediate work-around this permissions issue with inetd/xinetd ?
Thanks everyone for taking the time in looking into this issue.
Steve
Fwd: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet]
From: Larry Hall
To: Cygwin
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 23:33:51 -0400
Subject
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Banville, Stephen wrote:
> Bruce,
> This is starting to become clear o what is actually going on.
> How do you currently get around this issue ?
>
> Steve
Steve,
Please either quote the message you're replying to, or make sure your
mailer contains threading informatio
Original Message
Bruce Dobrin wrote:
YIKES! There it is, and right there in the users guide no less
not only that, but in a section I've actually read a number of
times!. Well, that does explain almost everything that is going on
( though, it seems to have
quot;
convert everything to windows") I'd really appreciate it.. In any case,
Thanks Igor, for the time spent already..
Bruce D.
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
gt; \\DFSMASTER\dfsroot\pipe\usr_pasquini\trash
> The command completed successfully.
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Banville, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Se
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> I tried executing a the command vi
hen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> hmmm, still experimenting: thought it might have something to do with
> inetd and mounts, but I also tried rlogin to which is
running
>
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Steve,
On Windows, if you use the Windows sharing mechanism (instead of a
proprietary filesystem driver), your shares are SMB shares (which stands
for Server Message Block, IIRC). The 'smbntsec' option is designed for
those kinds of shares.
Methinks the documentation w
27;Bruce Dobrin'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Banville, Stephen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 5:32 AM
Subject: RE: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> Igor,
> I tried settting smbntsec and it did not work. With older version I
> used to
> just
--Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 7:30 PM
To: Stephen Banville
Cc: 'Bruce Dobrin'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: NTsec permissions issue over inet
Steve,
On Windows, if you use the Windows sharing mec
x27;
> command within the shell, I cannot log in under my user name defined in
> the /etc/passwd file. Any ideas why this would ? This could somehow be
> related to my problem.
>
> Any help would be welcomed!!
>
> Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROT
brin
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
OK, further testing, I can't get the below rlogin "trick" to work on a
1.3.22 machine, the one it worked on is actually a 1.3.12 machine. so,
with 1.3.12 I can get it to wor
e confused than ever...
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> Sorry, On re-reading that, it's not as clear as it could b
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> Thanks for responding Larry,
>
> I actually had tried most permutations of (no)ntsec, (no)smbntsec,
(no)ntea,
> etc... and on other m
Original Message -
From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> Bruce Dobrin wrote:
> > Here are
Dobrin
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Banville, Stephen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: NTsec permiss
Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:52 AM
To: Banville, Stephen
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
Banville, Stephen wrote:
> My system that I have Cygwin running on is a Windows 2000 platform. I h
t: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Banville, Stephen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Banville, Stephen wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm not sure if this issue has been detected. I have traversed
> through the MANY probelm
ECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Banville, Stephen
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
Stephen,
I was about to ask the same question
If you find a solution, PLEASE Post, as I'm running out of workarounds, I
have had no luck with nosmbntsec/smbnt
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
For the future, please *attach* the cygcheck output to avoid generating
false positives on message archive search.
Random idea: would it be possible to instruct ezmlm-idx to bounce
messages containing cygcheck output in the body? (Or enough text to
identify cygcheck
ECTED]>
To: "Banville, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Banville, Stephen wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > I'm not sure if this
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Banville, Stephen wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm not sure if this issue has been detected. I have traversed
> through the MANY probelm reports
> and haven't been able to find any specifics on this problem.
>
> The problem:
>
> My system that I have Cygwin running on is a Wind
Sorry, I can't reproduce something similar here. Perhaps if you
read http://www.cygwin.com/bugs.html it might help those on the list.
Also, I'd direct you toward the User's Guide, specifically
http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html and the
description of smbntsec.
Larry
Origina
02 16:03:41 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ntsec Question
I think your confusion here comes from thinking that Cygwin controls the
user login. Windows handles the login process. To change which user is
logged in you will need to either log off windows then log the new user on,
or us
I think your confusion here comes from thinking that Cygwin controls the
user login. Windows handles the login process. To change which user is
logged in you will need to either log off windows then log the new user on,
or use ssh
Running cygwin.bat does not do anything than start an interactive
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:00:51PM -, Kris Thielemans wrote:
> Remaining questions:
> - is there another way to prevent specific users access to telnet or ftp ?
> (or ssh when I get round to installing sshd) ?
Edit /etc/passwd and set the shell field to /something/invalid/but/not/empty
> - I
could read the file with an unrecognised owner, but
test -r couldn't. (I recently reinstalled and upgraded the whole of cygwin,
so I don't think it's because I have old versions lying around).
Thanks for the help
Kris
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Thielemans [ma
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:02:59PM -, Kris Thielemans wrote:
> I have a problem with ntsec I think.
> I copied files from a remote disk (a Windows NT server) using the explorer.
> These files are then set to the following UID:
>
> ls -l test.txt
> -rwx--1 65535None 1225 De
Oh yes,
a related remark.
On the file with the funny UID, some things work, some don't. For instance,
I can vi it, but I cannot write it. This seems to say that some cygwin
programs call this file readable, but others don't... Bearing in mind the
premissions that it is said to, I would actually cl
Well, by groking I meant using them while deciding whether certain user
has access to file. And it seems that they are just ignored.
BTW Can you point me to this discussion in the list ? Searching list
archive I found only references to inheritable permissions problem
without description of the p
I suppose it depends on what you mean when you say "cygwin doesn't grok
inheritable permissions". This email list has discussed in the past that
Cygwin's permissions are "affected" by the setting of inheritable
permissions
in Windows. There is no corollary in POSIX permissions, which is the vie
--- Matt Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have been using Cygwin with a value CYGWIN="ntsec ntea binmode
> tty"
> for a long time under Win2k and WinXP with NTFS hard drives. On
> rereading the documentation, it seems to me that the "ntea" and
> "ntsec" values select different solutions t
Set it from the System control panel.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Malcolmson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ntsec not enabled from cygwin.bat
>
>
> Apparently unlike anyone else on this list, I have the
At 09:42 AM 3/28/2002, Daniel Holtkamp wrote:
>domain-user and not the local computer user. I reinstalled Cygwin
>several times and always ran into the same problem. (Domain user is
>not included in /etc/passwd ... only the local ones).
Add the domain user(s) to the /etc/passwd file.
> Did you check your /etc/group? Is there a group Guests and
> Guest has that group as primary group in /etc/passwd?
>
> Corinna
There is a group Guests and a user Guest - however, I'm not sure how to tell
the primary (or the secondary) group of a user.
I think the group entries may be wrong -
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:59:40PM -, Phil Dempster wrote:
> > Heck, why did I wrote /usr/doc/inetutils-1.3.2.README and what are
> > the announcements good for? Since version 1.3.2-15 we have the
> > following (quoted):
> [snip]
>
> Apologies and thanks...
>
> So: Since CVS is evidently ru
> Heck, why did I wrote /usr/doc/inetutils-1.3.2.README and what are
> the announcements good for? Since version 1.3.2-15 we have the
> following (quoted):
[snip]
Apologies and thanks...
So: Since CVS is evidently running as Guest (there are no entries in the
event log to contradict this) and t
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:46:48AM -, Phil Dempster wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've managed to get CVS pserver running on Win2K (ntsec) and am in the
> process of preparing some documentation for it. I'm trying to grasp just
> how the user ID switching works when CVS is spawned from inetd.
>
>
56 matches
Mail list logo
