Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010-10-06 Thread Raul Miller
I did a fresh install of cygwin today. I ran into the problem described at http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-08/msg00502.html (that was almost two months ago) http://cygwin.com/faq/ does not mention this issue. http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html#cygX11-6.dll-missing currently say

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010-08-20 Thread Reini Urban
2010/8/18 Andy Koppe: > On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: >>> On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >>> >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining th

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010-08-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 18 21:57, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: > >> On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: > >> >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010-08-18 Thread Andy Koppe
On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: >> On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >> >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick >> >>package,

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010-08-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: > On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: > >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick > >>package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process for

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010-08-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:32:50PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >>>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the >>>ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be an

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010-08-18 Thread William Blunn
On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process for reporting bugs which might narrow down the

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010-08-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the >ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process >for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more >relevant set of people.

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010-08-18 Thread William Blunn
I have now installed the packages libX11_6 and libXext6. ImageMagick's "convert" is now working. I suspect that the ImageMagick Cygwin package may need to be modified to make it depend on libX11_6 and libXext6. Bill -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: