On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:32:50PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >>>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the >>>ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process >>>for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more >>>relevant set of people. >>> >>Actually, this is the defined way to report bugs in a cygwin package. > >Ahhhh I see. It's /defined/ to be mediocre.
For *you*, since you've decided to be insulting, you can actually expect less-than-mediocre handling of your problems, this being a volunteer process and human nature being what it is and all. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
