On Aug 18 21:57, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: > >> On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: > >> >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the > >> >>ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process > >> >>for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more > >> >>relevant set of people. > >> >Actually, this is the defined way to report bugs in a cygwin package. > >> > >> Ahhhh I see. It's /defined/ to be mediocre. > >> > >> Rather than attempting to solve the problem head-on, redefine the > >> problem domain so that the problem is already solved. > >> > >> Inspired. > > > > Is there something in the water lately, which makes people on the > > list more aggressive than usual? > > > > It hasn't been redefined at all. It's the common way of reporting > > problems for a long time: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > > > > If you don't like it, I'm sorry. Are you going to volunteer to > > maintain a Cygwin packages bug-tracking system? > > Besides, thanks to the magic of mail filters, grabbing the attention > of a package maintainer isn't the problem anyway. The issue is whether > there's an active maintainer in the first place.
Exactly! Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
