On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: > On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: > >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick > >>package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process for reporting > >>bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more relevant set of > >>people. > >Actually, this is the defined way to report bugs in a cygwin package. > > Ahhhh I see. It's /defined/ to be mediocre. > > Rather than attempting to solve the problem head-on, redefine the > problem domain so that the problem is already solved. > > Inspired.
Is there something in the water lately, which makes people on the list more aggressive than usual? It hasn't been redefined at all. It's the common way of reporting problems for a long time: http://cygwin.com/problems.html If you don't like it, I'm sorry. Are you going to volunteer to maintain a Cygwin packages bug-tracking system? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
