Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing

2002-01-03 Thread Robert Collins
Ah-ha! Jason, heres a thought: what if MS's rebase is trashing the non-standard auto-export address offset information... Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.ht

RE: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing

2002-01-03 Thread Ralf Habacker
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:50:07PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:08:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: > > >> > On analysing this problem I added an option "-l" to the rebase t

Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing

2002-01-03 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > IMO we should be using bfd not the MS helper libraries - in the long > > term. Otherwise one cannot do any of this as part of a cross compile or > > cross-manipulation toolkit. > > Good point. > > I'm willing to do the righ

Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing

2002-01-03 Thread Jason Tishler
Rob, On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:06:35AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > After the above is completed, then I would entertain adding such an > > option if the community deemed it appropriate. But, wouldn't > > implementin

RE: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing

2001-12-29 Thread Ralf Habacker
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without > rebasing > >

Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing

2001-12-28 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:50:07PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:08:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: >> > On analysing this problem I added an option "-l" to the rebase tool to >> > list dll

RE: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing

2001-12-28 Thread Ralf Habacker
> -Original Message- > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:05 PM > To: Ralf Habacker > Cc: Cygwin > Subject: Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without > rebasing > > > Ralf, > > On We

Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing

2001-12-27 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > After the above is completed, then I would entertain adding such an > option if the community deemed it appropriate. But, wouldn't > implementing it via ReBaseImage()'s fReBase parameter as opposed to > plucking certain

Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing

2001-12-27 Thread Jason Tishler
Ralf, On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:08:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: > On analysing this problem I added an option "-l" to the rebase tool to > list dll's imagebase and -size without rebasing. It's very interesting > to see how MS chooses there Imagebase. What about the following alternative sol