----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > IMO we should be using bfd not the MS helper libraries - in the long > > term. Otherwise one cannot do any of this as part of a cross compile or > > cross-manipulation toolkit. > > Good point. > > I'm willing to do the right thing, but that is going to take longer given > the ramp up necessary for me learn about binutils' configury/make, bfd, > etc. However, I would like to get a rebase solution into setup.exe ASAP. > Is a two prong approach acceptable? In the short term, add rebase to > winsup/utils, integrate directly into setup.exe, etc. In the long term, > add rebase to binutils, integrate with ld, etc.
Yes. In fact it's probably a requirement, as setup.exe cannot get too big. Does the MS solution need .dll's not present on win95a ? Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
