=== ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > After the above is completed, then I would entertain adding such an > option if the community deemed it appropriate. But, wouldn't > implementing it via ReBaseImage()'s fReBase parameter as opposed to > plucking certain bytes out of the executable be a better approach? I > presume that this is how MS implements their '-s' (just sum image range) > option.
IMO we should be using bfd not the MS helper libraries - in the long term. Otherwise one cannot do any of this as part of a cross compile or cross-manipulation toolkit. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
