Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.

2004-11-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Reini Urban wrote: Max, Do we use some win32 callbacks with exceptions in setup.exe? I do see some candidates, but I didn't follow the codepath exactly. We definitely use exceptions within non-main threads, which are callbacks of a kind, I suppose. I'd have to go look to see if we have any except

Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.

2004-10-31 Thread Reini Urban
Danny Smith schrieb: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Danny Smith wrote: Gerrit wrote: Ole Jacob Hagen wrote: I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it with gcc-3.2.x instead.

Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.

2004-10-31 Thread Danny Smith
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Danny Smith wrote: > >> Gerrit wrote: >> >> >>> Ole Jacob Hagen wrote: >> >> Hi, I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. The performance should of Octave is much better, when compili

Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.

2004-10-31 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Danny Smith wrote: Gerrit wrote: Ole Jacob Hagen wrote: Hi, I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it with gcc-3.2.x instead. It would make more sense to identify

: Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.

2004-10-31 Thread Danny Smith
Gerrit wrote: > Ole Jacob Hagen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the >> performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. >> The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it >> with gcc-3.2.x instead. > It would make more sense to ident

Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.

2004-10-31 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Ole Jacob Hagen wrote: Hi, I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. Install the ccache package and try export CC='ccache gcc' export CXX='ccache g++' If you have a second PC you may also speedup builds with distcc. The performance

Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.

2004-10-29 Thread Tim Prince
At 07:55 AM 10/29/2004, Ole Jacob Hagen wrote: Hi, I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it with gcc-3.2.x instead. The reason might be that the memory allocator

Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.

2004-10-29 Thread Ole Jacob Hagen
Hi, I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it with gcc-3.2.x instead. The reason might be that the memory allocator on gnu stdc++ has changed to one which is seve