Danny Smith wrote:
Gerrit wrote:
Ole Jacob Hagen wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the
performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it
with gcc-3.2.x instead.
It would make more sense to identify the problem and do s.th. about it to resolve this issue then.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563
Wow, this is an interesting story about exception handling.
What I'm asking myself now:
Should we try again to use dwarf2 exceptions?
Should we try to find the reason why SjLj exceptions are slower on Cygwin than for the rest of the world?
Gerrit -- =^..^=
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
