At 07:55 AM 10/29/2004, Ole Jacob Hagen wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3.
The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it with gcc-3.2.x instead.
The reason might be that the memory allocator on gnu stdc++ has changed to one which is several times slower,
and therefore gives horrible performance on gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4.
Therefore it would be nice to have gcc-3.2.2-3 to my cygwin.
So where can I find gcc-3.2.2-3 to my cygwin?
If you haven't built and tested the gcc of your choice on cygwin, how do you know it performs better? What does the -3 mean in this context? Maybe you're comparing performance between different platforms, or at least different gcc targets.
Tim Prince
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
