Gerrit wrote: > Ole Jacob Hagen wrote:
>> Hi, >> >> I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the >> performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. >> The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it >> with gcc-3.2.x instead. > It would make more sense to identify the problem and do s.th. > about it to resolve this issue then. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563 Danny -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
