Hi ,
Please let me know, how to allocate a node using Rest API?
Thanks & Regards,
Bala . Arun Kumar
___
Crowbar mailing list
Crowbar@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar
For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
Hi ,
Please let me know, how to allocate a node using Rest API?
Thanks & Regards,
Bala . Arun Kumar
___
Crowbar mailing list
Crowbar@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar
For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
christopher_dearb...@dell.com (christopher_dearb...@dell.com) wrote:
> Hey Adam,
>
> FYI: I just took an update and diffed the two network_test_helpers:
>
> crowbar/barclamps/network/crowbar_engine/barclamp_network/test/network_test_helper.rb
>
> and
>
> crowbar/barclamps/crowbar/crowbar_framew
Chris is right, they are two separate problems (but no longer - thanks
guys for the quick fixes!)
christopher_dearb...@dell.com (christopher_dearb...@dell.com) wrote:
> This pull doesn't address the original problem that the
> network_test_helper.rb is not being copied into the crowbar_framework/
christopher_dearb...@dell.com (christopher_dearb...@dell.com) wrote:
> Hey Adam,
>
> Just ran the unit tests via "bundle exec rake test:units" and "dev
> run-unit-tests", and all the unit tests passed in both cases. Spoke with
> Andi, and he ran into the same problem over the weekend. He belie
This pull doesn't address the original problem that the network_test_helper.rb
is not being copied into the crowbar_framework/test directory as a result of
running dev setup-unit-tests or dev reload-unit-tests, whichever is supposed to
do it. Rob's temporary hack was to just check in a copy of
So, I believe this is fixed in this pull
https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/pull/1734
> -Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Allen, Wayne
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 1:06 PM
> To: crowbar
> Subject: [Crowbar] FW: [Still Failing] crowbar/travis-ci-crowbar#25 (master
I've updated the Marshall to use Json. Should fix that issue.
- Original Message -
From: Dearborn, Chris
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 01:58 PM
To: aspi...@suse.com ; crowbar
Subject: Re: [Crowbar] barclamp-network unit test failures
Hey Adam,
Just ran the unit tests via "bundle exec rak
Hey Adam,
Just ran the unit tests via "bundle exec rake test:units" and "dev
run-unit-tests", and all the unit tests passed in both cases. Spoke with Andi,
and he ran into the same problem over the weekend. He believes the issue is a
difference between the behavior of Marshal in Ruby 1.8 and
Hey Adam,
FYI: I just took an update and diffed the two network_test_helpers:
crowbar/barclamps/network/crowbar_engine/barclamp_network/test/network_test_helper.rb
and
crowbar/barclamps/crowbar/crowbar_framework/test/network_test_helper.rb
and they are identical.
Will look at the test failure
To throw more gasoline on the fire, all the tests appear to run fine when
running under ruby 1.8.7.
> -Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Allen, Wayne
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 12:06 PM
> To: crowbar
> Subject: [Crowbar] FW: [Still Failing] crowbar/travis-ci-crowb
Copying list...
-Original Message-
From: Allen, Wayne
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 12:06 PM
To: 'Adam Spiers'
Subject: RE: [Crowbar] [Still Failing] crowbar/travis-ci-crowbar#25 (master -
0d171b7)
I haven't looked at it, yet, Adam, working on some other breakage. At the
moment network
Adam Spiers (aspi...@suse.com) wrote:
> Regardless, it seems rather odd to be attempting to serialise nested
> data structures in database fields, and I don't see any
> deserialization code, so I'm guessing this was unintentional?
Ah no, I see now it was intentional. But I still don't understand
I'm getting test failures due to what looks like a bug in
network_test_helper.rb:
1) Error:
test_ConduitRule.build_if_remap:_Remap_with_known_product_name(ConduitRuleTest):
ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: SQLite3::SQLException: unrecognized token:
"{I" eth0:EF{I" path;": UP
Different problem and different branch ;)
I should have been more clear – this note was meant for crowbar 2.0, rather
than folsom/fred.
From: Makkelie, R - SPLXL [mailto:ramon.makke...@klm.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 3:55 AM
To: Abes, Andi
Cc: crowbar
Subject: Re: [Crowbar] admin node inst
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currenlty the provisioner barclamps sets up a polipo instance on the admin
> node
> to act as a proxy for the client nodes (AFAIK to be able to access remote
> package
> repositories). Is there any specific reason why polipo was cho
christopher_dearb...@dell.com (christopher_dearb...@dell.com) wrote:
> This issue is because “dev setup-unit-tests” doesn’t currently copy
> the network helper class into the dev testing area, which it used to
> do before the network barclamp was converted to a rails engine.
> Wayne has a task to f
Ralf Haferkamp (rha...@suse.de) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currenlty the provisioner barclamps sets up a polipo instance on the admin
> node
> to act as a proxy for the client nodes (AFAIK to be able to access remote
> package
> repositories). Is there any specific reason why polipo was choosen for this?
Hi,
currenlty the provisioner barclamps sets up a polipo instance on the admin node
to act as a proxy for the client nodes (AFAIK to be able to access remote
package
repositories). Is there any specific reason why polipo was choosen for this?
Instead of e.g. choosing apache2?
I am asking because
Guillaume Polaert (gpola...@cyres.fr) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I have multiple proposals for one BC in the v1.x?
Absolutely.
> For instance, I have two instances of the same service running on my
> cloud. Each has his own configuration (port, directories, etc.). Do
> I have to have 2 BC as "Service1
Hi Guillaume,
Yes, you can have multiple proposals for the same barclamp in Crowbar 1.x.
Exceptions to this are for some of the barclamps that are core to Crowbar, such
as the network barclamp, which limit themselves to 1 proposal.
Chris
Dell
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Guillaume Pola
Haselwanter Edmund (edm...@haselwanter.com) wrote:
> On 26.02.2013, at 15:36, andi_a...@dell.com wrote:
> > I think Wayne is just adding Gemfile.lock to the ignore file...
>
> http://yehudakatz.com/2010/12/16/clarifying-the-roles-of-the-gemspec-and-gemfile/
I read that a long time ago. It's a goo
Hi,
Can I have multiple proposals for one BC in the v1.x? For instance, I have two
instances of the same service running on my cloud. Each has his own
configuration (port, directories, etc.). Do I have to have 2 BC as "Service1"
and "Service2" or can I have on BC with 2 proposals?
I read in the
was it hanging at the building crowbar stage?
and after a while it had a time out?
because i thought it was my mistake with building the iso?
or is this a different problem?
greetz
Ramonskie
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:40 -0600, andi_a...@dell.com wrote:
Well, apparently, it doesn’t hate
24 matches
Mail list logo
