On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:11:57 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> It's a checkout error from the original gigantic Pull Request, sorry. I
>> don't plan to raise the JDK to C++17 in this one. But I'm not sure what to
>> do with this now, since maybe_unused is C++17. I don't think anyone is going
>
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 09:51:35 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in
>> the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the
>> effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the
>> u
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:11:37 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Please review this cleanup PR which removes overrides of
> `InflaterInputStream.fill` in `ZipFileInflaterInputStream` and
> `ZipFileSystem::getInputStream`. Associated boolean fields used to track
> `eof` are also removed.
>
> These ov
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 21:02:03 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Some files have been modified in 2024, but the copyright year has not been
>> properly updated. This should be fixed.
>>
>> I have located these modified files using:
>>
>> git log --since="Jan 1" --name-only --pretty=format: | sor
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 17:36:46 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
>> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>>
>> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand
>> in the class
@TobiHartmann There are still some unanswered questions I have, but committing
this since we need to work around vacation schedules.
**This in fact happens on both Windows _AND_ Linux.** However, _only_ on
Windows there is a crash. This fix fixes the crash but I don't understand
entirely why t
Thanks, Maurizio.
On 12/9/24 03:42, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
Great work Vlad!
The simdsort part seems a more "classic" FFM binding - where you have a
method handle per entry point. That seems to fit the design of FFM
rather well. In the second case (SVML/SLEEF) usage of FFM is limited to
b
On 12/9/24 07:55, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Some further observations.
- This arguably makes it harder for the auto-vectorize to access the SVML/SLEEF
functionality. However, in comes cases, we cannot guarantee the same guarantees
(IIRC mainly around monotonicity) as the scalar operations in Math.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:06:19 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH`
>> without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In
>> addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and
>>
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 23:33:08 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Handle non-existent module-path with ALL-MODULE-PATH
>> - Move test, more test fixes for JEP 493 enabled builds
>
> Adds a JFR event for socket connect operations.
>
> Existing tests TestSocketEvents and TestSocketChannelEvents modified to also
> check for connect events.
Tim Prinzing has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
requests fixes
- Use
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:31:21 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> not sure why client label is added, no java.desktop/accessibility files are
> in there
I was puzzling over that too.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22640#issuecomment-2532895836
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[0f035545](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/0f035545e5c0cd02d11ab8edd5786c1f1f6043a7)
from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
This is a noreg-doc backport - these additions are clarifications to the
ClassFile
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:43:42 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Improve the documentation for classfile instructions. Includes links to all
> opcodes, usage notes for instructions, and other various fixes.
>
> API Diff:
> https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/apidiff/cf-instr/java.base/module-summary.html
> Jav
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 18:09:21 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Class-File API lost debug printing capability with removal of the
>> `j.l.classfile.components.ClassPrinter` in JDK-8345343.
>> This PR adds `j.l.classfile.CompoundElement::toDebugString` method to
>> restore the capability.
>>
>> Please r
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:41:53 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Improve the documentation for classfile instructions. Includes links to all
>> opcodes, usage notes for instructions, and other various fixes.
>>
>> API Diff:
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/apidiff/cf-instr/java.base/module-summary.html
>
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:27:42 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - implement Severin's review
>>
>>Co-authored-by: Severin Gehwolf
>> - implement Jan's review
>> - implemen
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:31:57 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - implement Severin's review
>>
>>Co-authored-by: Severin Gehwolf
>> - implement Jan's review
>> - implement Hen
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:35:21 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
>> Please review this PR which contains the open L10n drop changes for RDP1.
>>
>> I recommend viewing the improved diffs which are built out by Jon's tool
>> here: https://cr.openjdk.org/~jlu/output/. As always, I can not confirm the
>> corr
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:40:23 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - implement Severin's review
>>
>>Co-authored-by: Severin Gehwolf
>> - implement Jan's review
>> - implement Henr
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:04:30 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - implement Severin's review
>>
>>Co-authored-by: Severin Gehwolf
>> - implement Jan's review
>> - implement He
> Please review this PR which contains the open L10n drop changes for RDP1.
>
> I recommend viewing the improved diffs which are built out by Jon's tool
> here: https://cr.openjdk.org/~jlu/output/. As always, I can not confirm the
> correctness on the quality of the translations themselves.
>
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:12:55 GMT, Ivan Šipka wrote:
>> @AlanBateman @mahendrachhipa @bwhuang-us @serhiysachkov @mcimadamore
>> @JornVernee
>>
>> adding as manual tests
>
> Ivan Šipka has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> both t
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:16:55 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Please review this PR which relaxes the interpretation of the system property
> `stackwalk.debug` in `java.lang.StackStreamFactory` to be case insensitive.
>
> Motivation:
> Only 5 of 83 boolean system properties in `java.base` have a ca
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:20:42 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> That would only make sense if jpackage can work without jlink
It can. It invokes the jlink only if external runtime is not supplied, which is
likely the default setup in most cases. jlink dependency is optional but
required in common use
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:36:12 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review this PR which contains the open L10n drop changes for RDP1.
>
> I recommend viewing the improved diffs which are built out by Jon's tool
> here: https://cr.openjdk.org/~jlu/output/. As always, I can not confirm the
> correctnes
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:10:09 GMT, Quan Anh Mai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is just a redo of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13093. mostly
>> just the revert of the backout.
>>
>> Regarding the related issues:
>>
>> - [JDK-8306008](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306008) and
>> [JDK-83
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:57:22 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Please review these changes to jpackage in light of [JEP
> 493](https://openjdk.org/jeps/493). When this feature is enabled, then some
> of the `jpackage` tests fail. The failures fall into the following categories:
>
> - `ALL-DEFAULT`
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:34:30 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Quan Anh Mai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Change wording on VectorLoadShuffleNode
>>
>> Co-authored-by: Jatin Bhateja
>
> I am observing some performance
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:10:09 GMT, Quan Anh Mai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is just a redo of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13093. mostly
>> just the revert of the backout.
>>
>> Regarding the related issues:
>>
>> - [JDK-8306008](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306008) and
>> [JDK-83
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:01:13 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> But there is no need for boolean properties to be case insensitive.
Indeed. Seems like a matter of style choice, or perhaps often just determined a
bit by chance or by the APIs picked to perform the evaluation. Some like their
tabs, other
> @AlanBateman @mahendrachhipa @bwhuang-us @serhiysachkov @mcimadamore
> @JornVernee
>
> adding as manual tests
Ivan Šipka has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
both tests declared automatic, labeled as jdk_foreign_stress and that gro
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:57:22 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Please review these changes to jpackage in light of [JEP
> 493](https://openjdk.org/jeps/493). When this feature is enabled, then some
> of the `jpackage` tests fail. The failures fall into the following categories:
>
> - `ALL-DEFAULT`
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:07:00 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Will changing `requires jdk.jlink;` to `requires static jdk.jlink;` let
> include `jdk.jpackage` without `jdk.jlink`?
That would only make sense if jpackage can work without jlink, meaning all the
options for creating a run-time image
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:16:55 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Please review this PR which relaxes the interpretation of the system property
> `stackwalk.debug` in `java.lang.StackStreamFactory` to be case insensitive.
>
> Motivation:
> Only 5 of 83 boolean system properties in `java.base` have a ca
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:12:55 GMT, Ivan Šipka wrote:
>> @AlanBateman @mahendrachhipa @bwhuang-us @serhiysachkov @mcimadamore
>> @JornVernee
>>
>> adding as manual tests
>
> Ivan Šipka has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> both t
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:36:12 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review this PR which contains the open L10n drop changes for RDP1.
>
> I recommend viewing the improved diffs which are built out by Jon's tool
> here: https://cr.openjdk.org/~jlu/output/. As always, I can not confirm the
> correctnes
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:02:40 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> This is called in an `assert` so I think throwing `AssertionError` seems
>> more reasonable, the original implementation also throws `AssertionError`
>
> I see, you want to throw an error here and not just use an assert statement
> that
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:34:30 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Quan Anh Mai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Change wording on VectorLoadShuffleNode
>>
>> Co-authored-by: Jatin Bhateja
>
> I am observing some performance
> Hi,
>
> This is just a redo of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13093. mostly just
> the revert of the backout.
>
> Regarding the related issues:
>
> - [JDK-8306008](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306008) and
> [JDK-8309531](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309531) have been fix
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 4:45 AM Thomas Stüfe
wrote:
> Note that we have a script for that; see
> make/scripts/update_copyright_year.sh . I use it a lot. Sonia recently
> enhanced it. It even has an option to update copyrights for foreign
> companies.
>
Awesome - thanks for the pointe
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:36:12 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review this PR which contains the open L10n drop changes for RDP1.
>
> I recommend viewing the improved diffs which are built out by Jon's tool
> here: https://cr.openjdk.org/~jlu/output/. As always, I can not confirm the
> correctnes
Please review this PR which relaxes the interpretation of the system property
`stackwalk.debug` in `java.lang.StackStreamFactory` to be case insensitive.
Motivation:
Only 5 of 83 boolean system properties in `java.base` have a case sensitive
interpretation. Relaxing these to be case insensitive
Backport this trivial fix to parsing of the system property
"resource.bundle.debug" to jdk24.
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 4f855d1342d55aeee93b7d0c5796fbfd4994c856
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22664/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=22664&range=
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 17:22:14 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Replace broken getProperty with Boolean.getBoolean.
>
> Manual testing confirms trace messages are enabled with
> `-Dresource.bundle.debug=true`
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 4f855d13
Author:Roger Riggs
URL:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:24:34 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 17 additional
>> commits
> This PR is a resubmission after PR #21593 was rolled back, and the unsafe
> offset overflow issue has been fixed.
>
> 1) Move getChars methods of StringLatin1 and StringUTF16 to DecimalDigits to
> reduce duplication.
>
> 2) HexDigits and OctalDigits also include getCharsLatin1 and getCharsUTF
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 17:34:25 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> I'll merge master later today/tomorrow which might fix this.
And it did indeed fix it.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22609#issuecomment-2531793418
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:38:57 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [06c44dd5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/06c44dd568d91e1bd68f60fd3e57abcbe97e5dca)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit bein
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:36:12 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review this PR which contains the open L10n drop changes for RDP1.
>
> I recommend viewing the improved diffs which are built out by Jon's tool
> here: https://cr.openjdk.org/~jlu/output/. As always, I can not confirm the
> correctnes
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:38:57 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [06c44dd5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/06c44dd568d91e1bd68f60fd3e57abcbe97e5dca)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit bein
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[06c44dd5](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/06c44dd568d91e1bd68f60fd3e57abcbe97e5dca)
from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Per Minborg on 10 Dec 2024 and was
revi
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:41:53 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Improve the documentation for classfile instructions. Includes links to all
>> opcodes, usage notes for instructions, and other various fixes.
>>
>> API Diff:
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/apidiff/cf-instr/java.base/module-summary.html
>
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 06:24:21 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> This PR is a resubmission after PR #21593 was rolled back, and the unsafe
>> offset overflow issue has been fixed.
>>
>> 1) Move getChars methods of StringLatin1 and StringUTF16 to DecimalDigits to
>> reduce duplication.
>>
>> 2) HexDigit
> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH`
> without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In
> addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and
> `--limit-modules` are used in combination. It failed earlier an
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 18:33:06 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> Such behavioral change is a good change as jlink from the default and
> --generate-linkable-runtime build would have the consistent behavior. If a
> module path is given with no root module (empty path), it throws the
> following error. I t
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:01:53 GMT, Michel Charpentier wrote:
>> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Addressing review feedback
>
> I just noticed this improved performance in Java 23. However, it still
> doesn't
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:36:12 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review this PR which contains the open L10n drop changes for RDP1.
>
> I recommend viewing the improved diffs which are built out by Jon's tool
> here: https://cr.openjdk.org/~jlu/output/. As always, I can not confirm the
> correctnes
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:05:45 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> Oh you're right. That's odd though. But the translations aren't wrong then.
>
> `每个 是\n限定的程序包名称.`
> We use here, but the args format is using Chinese translation,`=
> [-]<程序包>(,[-]<程序包>)*`
>
> Should that be consistent?
Regarding `''` - p
Hi Archie,
Note that we have a script for that; see
make/scripts/update_copyright_year.sh . I use it a lot. Sonia recently
enhanced it. It even has an option to update copyrights for foreign
companies.
Calling it from the source root usually works well, it only still struggles
with large merge co
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 08:40:31 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> This PR proposes to fix a performance regression (on x64 platforms) for
> 32-bit strings introduced by
> [JDK-8345120](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345120).
>
> The PR also fixes a performance regression in the benchmarks caused by
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 07:30:19 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes to fix a performance regression (on x64 platforms) for
>> 32-bit strings introduced by
>> [JDK-8345120](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345120).
>>
>> The PR also fixes a performance regression in the benchmarks caus
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 22:04:38 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> I don't think it is necessary to exclude jdk.jpackage from the `ALL-DEFAULT`
> though if jdk.jlink module should be excluded. As I commented earlier,
> jdk.jpackage is functional without the jdk.jlink.
You cannot include `jdk.jpackage`
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:42:57 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Some files have been modified in 2024, but the copyright year has not been
>> properly updated. This should be fixed.
>>
>> I have located these modified files using:
>>
>> git log --since="Jan 1" --name-only --pretty=format: | sor
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:36:12 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review this PR which contains the open L10n drop changes for RDP1.
>
> I recommend viewing the improved diffs which are built out by Jon's tool
> here: https://cr.openjdk.org/~jlu/output/. As always, I can not confirm the
> correctnes
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 11:27:01 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
>> Galder Zamarreño has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 30 additional
>> comm
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:18:14 GMT, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>> Overall, looks fine.
>>
>> So, there will be `inline_min_max`, `inline_fp_min_max`, and
>> `inline_long_min_max` which slightly vary. I'd prefer to see them unified.
>> (Or, at least, enhance `inline_min_max` to cover `minL`/maxL` cas
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:18:36 GMT, Quan Anh Mai wrote:
>> src/jdk.incubator.vector/share/classes/jdk/incubator/vector/Byte512Vector.java
>> line 1046:
>>
>>> 1044: String msg = ("index "+si+"out of range
>>> ["+length+"] in "+
>>> 1045: java
> For two cases:
>
> 1. When the ImageReaderFactory was loaded by local jdk,that means the
> ImageReaderFactory was loaded by boot class loader,then init the `Path
> BOOT_MODULES_JIMAGE` by using `sun.nio.fs.DefaultFileSystemProvider` which is
> obtained through reflection,due to it is in jdk i
On 2024-12-09 21:39, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
FWIW, when I've thought about the topic of copyright and licenses
before, I think there are several aspects that can be separated.
One is a syntactic-only check, as the in-flight Skara PR may provide.
I think having a syntactic-only check is Skara i
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:16:19 GMT, Quan Anh Mai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is just a redo of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13093. mostly
>> just the revert of the backout.
>>
>> Regarding the related issues:
>>
>> - [JDK-8306008](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306008) and
>> [JDK-83
> This PR proposes to fix a performance regression (on x64 platforms) for
> 32-bit strings introduced by
> [JDK-8345120](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345120).
>
> The PR also fixes a performance regression in the benchmarks caused by using
> the wrong type for `MemorySegment`.
>
> Regr
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:17:22 GMT, Quan Anh Mai wrote:
>> src/jdk.incubator.vector/share/classes/jdk/incubator/vector/Double128Vector.java
>> line 859:
>>
>>> 857: .reinterpretAsInts()
>>> 858: .intoArray(a, offset);
>>> 859: defaul
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 13:40:16 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> @merykitty do you want me to initiate tier 1 to 3 tests?
>
>> @PaulSandoz @sviswa7 Thanks for your advice, I have made the PR ready for
>> review
>>
>> @iwanowww Could you take another look at this, please?
>>
>> @jatin-bhateja Could you
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 07:01:27 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Quan Anh Mai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> adverb order
>
> src/jdk.incubator.vector/share/classes/jdk/incubator/vector/Byte512Vector.java
> line 1046:
>
>> 10
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:36:12 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review this PR which contains the open L10n drop changes for RDP1.
>
> I recommend viewing the improved diffs which are built out by Jon's tool
> here: https://cr.openjdk.org/~jlu/output/. As always, I can not confirm the
> correctnes
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 07:44:57 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Quan Anh Mai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Change wording on VectorLoadShuffleNode
>>
>> Co-authored-by: Jatin Bhateja
>
> src/hotspot/share/opto/library_c
> Hi,
>
> This is just a redo of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13093. mostly just
> the revert of the backout.
>
> Regarding the related issues:
>
> - [JDK-8306008](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306008) and
> [JDK-8309531](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309531) have been fix
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 07:54:55 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> src/jdk.incubator.vector/share/classes/jdk/incubator/vector/Byte128Vector.java
>> line 822:
>>
>>> 820: static final Class ETYPE = byte.class; // used by the JVM
>>> 821:
>>> 822: Byte128Shuffle(byte[] indices) {
>>
>>
79 matches
Mail list logo
