xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...
Donny9 commented on PR #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048#issuecomment-2772781822
@yamt hello, we already have it, you can use dd command in nsh with
parameter "conv=trunc".
By the way, there are two implementations of dd in the current system, one
under nshlib a
yamt commented on PR #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048#issuecomment-2774082719
> @yamt hello, we already have it, you can use dd command in nsh with
parameter "conv=trunc". By the way, there are two implementations of dd in the
current system, one under nshlib and t
yamt commented on PR #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048#issuecomment-2777492317
> > > i'm not interested in the nshlib version of it.
> > > i didn't know the nshlib version already had the functionality. thank
you for pointing out.
> > > implementation-wise, i p
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048#issuecomment-2775313123
let's merge this patch first, @Donny9 please migrate the new feature from
nshlib and remove that implementation to avoid the code duplication.
--
This is an automated message
yamt commented on PR #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048#issuecomment-2774125166
> > i'm not interested in the nshlib version of it.
> > i didn't know the nshlib version already had the functionality. thank
you for pointing out.
> > implementation-wise, i prefer
Donny9 commented on PR #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048#issuecomment-2774111842
> i'm not interested in the nshlib version of it.
> i didn't know the nshlib version already had the functionality. thank you
for pointing out.
> implementation-wise, i prefer this
nuttxpr commented on PR #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048#issuecomment-2772685496
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
No, this PR likely *does not* meet the NuttX require
yamt opened a new pull request, #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048
## Summary
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/dd.html
> notrunc
> Do not truncate the output file. Preserve blocks in the output
> file not explicitly written
