yamt commented on PR #3048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3048#issuecomment-2777492317

   > > > i'm not interested in the nshlib version of it.
   > > > i didn't know the nshlib version already had the functionality. thank 
you for pointing out.
   > > > implementation-wise, i prefer this PR because the nshlib 
implementation looks poor. (the use of strstr instead of a proper parsing of 
the options.)
   > > 
   > > 
   > > @yamt In summary, we need to remove one of them, and I think it doesn't 
matter which one. Using strstr can find substrings more quickly.
   > 
   > do you know why we have two implementations of dd in the first place? (i 
dunno)
   
   reading the description of the PR which introduced system/dd,
   it seems purely for developing purpose.
   https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/1921
   i suspect it might be better for us to just remove it.
   or maybe mark it EXPERIMENTAL or whatever to make it clear it isn't for 
general use at least.
   
   (i personally prefer system/dd over nshlib one because it's convenient to 
compile it to a standalone wasi module. but i don't think it's an important use 
case for nuttx-apps.)
   
   what do you think?
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to