>How about something cool like Blender for a case study.
Would Yo, Frankie! be acceptable? ;)
www.yofrankie.org
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Ted Bullock wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Adam Baxter
> wrote:
> > Most, if not all of you should know of wget
>
> Hmm, just reading the
Maybe case study was the wrong phrase. Easy target possibly. In any case,
wget has the normal interesting dependencies, such as openssl.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Ted Bullock wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Adam Baxter
> wrote:
> > Most, if not all of you should know of wget
>
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Adam Baxter wrote:
> Most, if not all of you should know of wget
Hmm, just reading the word wget put me to sleep for a minute. How
about something cool like Blender for a case study. I cannot imagine
wanting to read a paper about how the wonderful wget ended up
Most, if not all of you should know of wget. Unfortunately wget doesn't have
a Windows maintainer at the moment.
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-w...@gnu.org/msg00796.html
The "latest" build I can find of it is
http://www.christopherlewis.com/WGet/WGetFiles.htm
A VS2005 solution at http://www.chris
* wget (currently has no Windows maintainer), has a great Windows port
though
curl, just because it's curl
*** pcap - would be a good test case for our driver packages
** libusb - same reason as pcap, also missing a windows maintainer
* grep - who doesn't love grep?
___
Just noticed this thread.
.NET packages will have their own package category (I think?), so eventually
you'll be able to filter on .NET libraries or whatever you're looking for.
Might be worth looking at the popularity lists on CodePlex/CodeProject and
others to see what the most used .NET apps an
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Jonathan Ben-Joseph wrote:
> This is because C truly is the least common denominator when it comes to
> language binding, almost every mainstream language can call directly into C
> shared libraries without much of any boilerplate code (see P/Invoke in .NET
> or ct
If you want to go the Swig route, Swig also works on C. In fact it works
better, with less gotchas/issues. Swig wouldn't even be totally necessary.
This is because C truly is the least common denominator when it comes to
language binding, almost every mainstream language can call directly into C
sh
:O, Awesome, and thank you to Stephen Zarkos.
Garret, today you had greats news!!!
Do you have planned the roles to manage this server?, will be the
"Ever-So-Talented"?
2010/5/17 Garrett Serack
> The Ever-So-Talented Stephen Zarkos has just told me that our CoApp build
> box is up.
>
>
>
> It
The Ever-So-Talented Stephen Zarkos has just told me that our CoApp build box
is up.
It's a 16-core Xeon with 64gb of memory running Windows Server 2008R2 - we can
spin up VMs to our hearts content on there.
It's on our external interop rack, so it's accessible to the internet, not
internal Mi
I don't think we can do C++ and only bind to MSVCRT; hence C being the selected
language.
Plus, I think it's a good idea to keep it lowest-common-denominator. :D
G
From: coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft
That's great!!!
2010/5/17 Garrett Serack
> I'll have this done by EOD tomorrow.
>
> G
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
> coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft@lists.launchpad.net[mailto:
> coapp-developers-bounces+garretts =
> microsoft@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Will
I'll have this done by EOD tomorrow.
G
-Original Message-
From: coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of William A. Rowe Jr.
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:13 PM
To: coapp-
>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Elizabeth M Smith
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Binding facilities for most high level languages are common
Is this a new problem to solve tha exponentially increases the effort on
the part of CoApp development, or would integration with swig or similar
solve the proble
On 5/17/2010 6:29 PM, Mark Stone wrote:
> I'll talk to Garrett tomorrow about licensing. That may be something I
> can take off his plate, since you guys certainly don't want me
> touching any actual code.
>
> Off the top of my head I think we want the New BSD License for now, as
> the least restr
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Elizabeth M Smith <
emsm...@elizabethmariesmith.com> wrote:
> On 5/17/2010 7:36 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Elizabeth M Smith
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As we discussed during the summit and is mentioned on the wiki:
>>>
>>>
>> Ah,
On 5/17/2010 7:36 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Elizabeth M Smith
wrote:
As we discussed during the summit and is mentioned on the wiki:
Ah, found it.
Few dependencies
Fast
Small
Binding facilities for most high level languages are common
The a
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Elizabeth M Smith
wrote:
> As we discussed during the summit and is mentioned on the wiki:
Ah, found it.
> Few dependencies
> Fast
> Small
> Binding facilities for most high level languages are common
>
> The ability to tie a C library into anything and everythin
I'll talk to Garrett tomorrow about licensing. That may be something I
can take off his plate, since you guys certainly don't want me
touching any actual code.
Off the top of my head I think we want the New BSD License for now, as
the least restrictive in terms of what code can be combined with wh
On 5/17/2010 7:19 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Rivera, Rafael
wrote:
Hey Olaf,
Glad to hear you made it home in time! I think last we all spoke, we
needed a license before code could be committed. I'm sure that's on
Garrett's long TODO list.
Ok. I r
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Rivera, Rafael
wrote:
> Hey Olaf,
>
> Glad to hear you made it home in time! I think last we all spoke, we
> needed a license before code could be committed. I'm sure that's on
> Garrett's long TODO list.
Ok. I remember C was chosen for the engine. What's the rati
On 5/17/2010 7:15 PM, Rivera, Rafael wrote:
Hey Olaf,
Glad to hear you made it home in time! I think last we all spoke, we
needed a license before code could be committed. I'm sure that's on
Garrett's long TODO list.
/rafael
On 5/17/2010 5:54 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hey,
Did everybo
Hey Olaf,
Glad to hear you made it home in time! I think last we all spoke, we
needed a license before code could be committed. I'm sure that's on
Garrett's long TODO list.
/rafael
On 5/17/2010 5:54 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Did everybody have a good flight? Turns out I was back ju
Hey,
Did everybody have a good flight? Turns out I was back just in time,
the volcano ashes were over the Netherlands again today.
Is there any code in the VCS yet? If so, I can't find it.
--
Olaf
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-develo
24 matches
Mail list logo
