>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Elizabeth M Smith >> <emsm...@elizabethmariesmith.com> wrote: >> >>> Binding facilities for most high level languages are common
Is this a new problem to solve tha exponentially increases the effort on the part of CoApp development, or would integration with swig or similar solve the problem at a reduced cost. It's been done often with mixed results, and reinventing this wheel is best avoided, and at least not tying the success/failure of the core CoApp 1.0 to this metric. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
