Martin,
The 43 looks so much like a scaled up Viking 33. That is a truly beautiful
boat! There is one for sale in Toronto. I would love to own one of those.
The admiral can't bare the the thought of another rehab or another 70s boat. I
don't think I have another rehab in me either...
Love
Turn buckle boots work and they don't trap water they are not expensive and
come in several sizes
On Monday, January 12, 2015, Chuck S via CnC-List
wrote:
> IMHO, remove all of that ugly protective cover and take closeup pics of
> the bare metal. Remove all of the tape and clean off the sticky
If the size is a good fit, the 33-1 is the best boat C&C ever made and one
of the best boats you could ever buy.
Just sayin'. Good luck with your purchase.
Barbara H. Fellers
"Flight Risk"
'76 C&C 33-1 #151
Charleston, SC
>
___
This List i
Elevated moisture readings from a moisture meter are not always indicative of
moisture. Further investigation is required. A surveyor would know how to do
this. And YES I would whole heartedly agree with the surveyor - a new boat may
be dry but the old boat is solid.
Our 1987 J27 had a cored
I have been impressed with the way my 1974 33 3/4 tonner is made. Other than
the likely-hood for moisture in the balsa core of the cabin roof and the
cockpit sole (not the fault of the manufacturer) the boat looks to be solid
as a rock and sails nice and stiff. I do wish I had the 33-1 layout, thou
How would you have registered a boat without the HIN? All boats
manufactured in the US and Canada have the HIN in the upper starboard of
the transom since 1972.
Bill Bina
On 1/14/2015 9:05 AM, Burt Stratton via CnC-List wrote:
I have been impressed with the way my 1974 33 3/4 tonner is made.
Those of you who are computer literate: this is kind of a boat question - a
member in our museum's model boat club is interested in getting an easy to use
2D drafting program. He is leading the task to design and prepare a kit to
build a model of one of our oyster 'buy' boats which used to be pr
I don't know the boat, but especially for the guys in Detroit:
http://annapolis.craigslist.org/boa/4844105486.html
--
Joel
301 541 8551
___
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album.
Please donate to the C&C Photo Album to keep this list free for a
I use Autocad lite, which works well and USED to be pretty cheap, but not
anymore.
There are iterations of this for tablet, but they say you can only edit, not
completely draw, so, not sure how that would work. Maybe edit an existing
drawing to your specs.
There is also Google SketchUp, free, af
I agree, the learning curve on auto cad type products is painful sometimes,
I use a product - Turbo-Cad that is normally priced around $40- $80,
depending on sales, it will do most anything, and save in most any format.
The thought to use a student is quite good,
George Cone
C&C 40
Fr
There is a free program called Freeship which is designed for boat
designers, it is probably the best bet for inputting lines, although the
learning curve is pretty steep.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/freeship/
Jim Watts
Paradigm Shift
C&C 35 Mk III
Victoria, BC
On 14 January 2015 at 08:24, G
Burt, As the other response stated, there should be a HIN on the transom. My
1976 38 doesn't have one there, I don't know if it was never there or was
faired over during a topside repaint. I do have a small C&C plaque in the
cockpit that has "380100" on it and that is the number on all the paper
Someone correct me if I'm wrong on this...
The stern of a displacement hull vessel will begin to submerge as you
approach hull speed. It's settling into the trough of its own wake(s).
Even kayaks do it.
Someone told me a long time ago that a displacement vessel could
"theoretically sink itself
Yes – it is simple physics. At 11-12 knots my stern is nearly under. A modern
boat won’t sink, more like half-plane like those monster “motor yachts” from
the 60s-70s with the huge V-12 Detroit Diesels that go up the river leaving a 6
foot wake. An old narrow clipper ship could potentially be sa
I would have thought (no science here) if it had that much power, it could climb over its own bow wave and "escape " hull speed. (This is how a Flux-Capacitor works - trust me on this! )
Fear of sinking by over-power is why I won't put a turbo charger on my A4
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Sam
Salter via CnC-List
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 6:26 PM
To: CnC
Subject: Stus-List Fw: The stern squats at high speed
I would have though
Yes, but as I understand it, some time before that happens with a typical
displacement hull with no planing surfaces it becomes so unstable it
capsizes and sinks or at least all heck breaks loose.
Modern wide arsed hulls are more likely to plane with enough power (read
that as LOTS!)
Ken H.
On 1
perhaps a turbo 7.4L muscle car engine would squeeze in the cabin
replacing the table
> On Jan 14, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Burt Stratton via CnC-List
> wrote:
>
> Fear of sinking by over-power is why I won’t put a turbo charger on my A4
>
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-l
On my Shields, which is a lovely slim 30 footer with long overhangs, when we
get going hull speed and the breeze is trying to push us quicker, the bow wave
starts rolling over the foredeck and the stern wave rolls over the aft deck.
Any faster and we'd be under!
Andy
C&C 40
Peregrine
Andrew Bu
Love the look of the Shields. I think at some point boat designers calculated
the hull speed and then calculated the height of the wave created and added
enough freeboard to the boat design to prevent water coming on deck. (Then
marketing said yeah, add more freeboard so we can have standing hea
20 matches
Mail list logo
