done
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 7:36 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: [1/7] git commit: VPC : password server, start password server
when guest network is created
>
> http://g
Do we have plan to separate create snapshot and backup snapshot?
If that's true, only backup snapshot commands need to be synchronized since
creating snapshot is fast.
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:51 A
to understand how network ACL rules are different from
>Firewall rules. The difference comes about when you look at the
>stateful/stateless nature of traffic being shaped by the router. In
>most networking parlance I have seen, network ACLs serve only stateless
>behaviour. Firewal
There are several commands need this kind of threshold, e.g. Move volume,
create template from snapshot,
So this is common requirement , not only for createsnapshot.
Can we add threshold mechanism in host command queue to resolve this issue?
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su [m
Hi all,
I'm trying to write some unit tests for network manager, I believe DB setup is
needed and some pre-test DB initial entries are also needed. Is there any unit
test frame work to setup DB and populate some initial data into DB before
launching the unit test? Or is there other way to mock
Try this,
- stop management server
- null out mgmt_server_id for hosts in host table
- start management server
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Caleb Call [mailto:cc...@overstock.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:48 PM
> To:
> Cc: Caleb Call; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.
Is there any example in Cloudstack?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 4:22 PM
> To: Anthony Xu; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: how to write Unit test which requires DB setup
>
> Mock your db acces
Strange , I didn't see any mock in SecurityGroupManagerImpl2Test.java, in
SecurityGroupManagerTestContext.xml?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 5:36 PM
> To: Alex Huang; Anthony Xu; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
&
Do you reboot VR through CloudStack UI or through hypervisor directly or inside
VR?
Only reboot VR through CloudStack UI/API will trigger CloudStack to hot plug
tier's NICs and reapply all rules
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: benoit lair [mailto:kurushi4...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wedn
0
> 2013-02-14 10:53:39,877 WARN
> [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Unable to update router r-18165-VM's VPN
> connection status
> 2013-02-14 10:53:39,879 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
> (DirectAgent-20:null) Seq 14-
I have plan to add isolated and shared networks to SG enabled zone in 4.2, the
service providers on these network will be supported in SG enabled zone, but as
for SG enabled shared network, current plan is only support Virtual Router as
service provider. If you want to add other service provider
It should apply to all XerServer and XCP,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:19 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Anthony Xu
> Subject: Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOL
t: Re: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Understood - thanks for the update.
>
> Dave.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Anthony Xu
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > For 4.1 , this feature is only for
Does anyone happen to know the reason for this build failure?
Mvn -e install
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 149 source files to
/home/anthony/vmops/incubator-cloudstack/utils/target/classes
[INFO]
Thanks for bringing this up,
For security group, we may need to handle following things,
As you mentioned,
Anti-spoofing rules need to be updated, when secondary IP is
associate/dissociate to NIC.
And
Security group rule can base on cidr and it can base on account/security group,
For example a
Hi folks,
I'd like to start the IP clearance process for the Citrix feature - support
security group enabled network in advanced zone
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737
Citrix would like to donate this feature to Apache CloudStack,
In 4.0, security group is only supported in
]
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:36 PM
> >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
> >
> >Folks please pass on comments if any, otherwise it is assumed that the
> spec
> is
> >approved by the commu
; Got it,
>
> So we are still only talking about SG on advanced shared networks.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> -kd
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5:11 PM
> >To: cl
nce: CLOUDSTACK-737] support security group
> enabled network in advanced zone
>
> Anthony the patch you link that you specified is just a jira link.
> Please provide correct patch link. You can put in your
> people.apache.org space.
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
> >
Thanks for the write-up,
One comment,
Is there any reason not use link-local IPv4 address?
>*User VM would have one link-local IPv6 address
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:11 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.
uary 17, 2013 10:13 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Anthony Xu
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the write-up,
> >
> > One comment,
> > Is there an
support draft functional spec(phase 1)
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Xu
> wrote:
> > My misunderstanding, I thought that's the link-local ip in Xenserver
> or KVM:-)
> >
> > If a VM is on both IPv6 and IPv4 network, what's the link-local
> a
Hi Marcus,
I didn't realize the rp_filter issue when I worked on VPC feature, thanks for
the fix.
With the fix , guest NIC is with rp_filter on, public NIC is with rp_filter
off, that's correct. But seems eth0 ( link local) is with rp_filter off, which
is supposed to be on, this is very trivia
h root disk has a copy of the base
> disk in the
> > destination storage pool. Is this an issue?
> Waste space(each disk will have its own base disk, instead of sharing),
> and base disk clean up will be an issue(as there is no cloudstack db
> entry to track this new base dis
cipation level. A VM can have
> >networks with SG and without at the same time. If that's the case this
> >feature proposal just got more awesome!
> >
> >-kd
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citri
Dual stack in user VM or router VM?
router VM must have dual stack because link-local is still ipv4, right?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:13 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUS
I see
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:17 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:48 AM
It is not easy to sync/maintain the account information in several regions.
Is it possible to have a separate account service, cloudstack management
servers in multiple region can consult ?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent:
Should we use service_id, provider_id instead?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:21 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: take a look at your foreign key, it may exceed mysql limtion
>
> S
f
> * ACL accept
> * ACL deny
> * instance-based SG
> * nic based SG
>
> On 1/18/13 9:50 AM, "Anthony Xu" wrote:
>
> >Thanks for comments,
> >It is nice to have security group in NIC level
> >checked AWS, which is implemented with Elastic Network Inte
Hi Simon,
I'm glad to see ENI feature in CloudStack, I do have some questions,
createNic,
it actually allocates IP, should CS limit the number of NIC an account can
create to avoid one account use too many IP?
attachNic,
can a NIC be attached to any VM, or only VM in the same network with N
ecurityGroups" - i.e. add an optional
> parameter "nicid" to allow a query for the set of NICs associated with
> a given NIC. Other than that I don't think the Security Group Platform
> API needs to change, unless I am missing something.
>
> I will update the spe
-Remove host tag on each host by executing
xe host-parameter-remove param-name=tags host-uuid=
-Restart management server
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:00 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> S
That's a bad/quick fix for http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15922
Delete account will expunge all VMs for this account immediate , if
expunge.interval is too short , VM GC may kick in, then two threads are trying
to expunge the same VMs, which causes expunge fail.
I think you can remove the
ne is
supported in a zone, volume snapshot or vm snapshot.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:54 AM
> To: Mice Xia; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Anthony Xu
> Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
one.
later, we may support both of them in one setup.
Anthony
From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:30 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Huang; Mice Xia; Anthony Xu
Subject: 答复: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
Anthony,
Thanks
I would like to request merge of feature " security group in advanced zone"
CloudStack had this feature before, but didn't support /maintain it for a
while, this one enables this feature and extends this feature, below is the
summary
- re-enable SG for KVM in advanced zone
- add SG support fo
I think direct iscsi access from guest VM probably is faster than virtual disk
in XenServer,
in XenServer, virtual disk is emulated by dom0 application, virtual NIC is
emulated by dom0 Kernel, direct iscsi access basically moves from virtual disk
emulation to virtual NIC emulation.
Anthony
-1
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:01 PM
> To: Chip Childers; Alex Huang; Brett Porter; Animesh Chaturvedi; David
> Nalley; Edison Su; run...@gmail.com; dk...@apache.org;
> htrippa...@schubergphilis.com; shadow...@gmai
Xenserver hosts under one cluster are in one XenServer pool, there is one iscsi
storage repository from xenserver hosts perspective.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:26 PM
> To: Alex Huang
> Cc
this SR.
Anthony
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:00 PM
To: Anthony Xu
Cc: Alex Huang; Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen
Subject: Re: Setting up CloudStack to use XenServer with iSCSI
OK, cool...thanks
rs [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 7:48 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013
m: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 10:32 AM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:20:45AM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote:
> >
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 11:09 AM
> To: Alex Huang
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][INFRA] Setting up gerrit
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:06:37AM -0800, Alex Huang
e, what's the next step? Call for vote, or Call for review?
Thanks,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 11:20 AM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subjec
Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:19 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:43:52AM -0800, Ant
unit test for those
managers may scare them away.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:35 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: Chip Childers; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]
I checked in a build fix 5 minutes ago, I can build now.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:48 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS:
> [j
So we changed the criteria for merge, should we post a formal document for the
criteria? In case someone is not aware of that.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:52 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
start one.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:38 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: 'David Nalley'; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Adva
The name is confusing, but systemvm.iso is not bootable, it includes several
packages and files which will be installed /copied to system VM.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:59 AM
> To: cloudstack-de
When router vm is started through CS UI/API, CS will send all dhcp info to
router VM again.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Router VM and previ
Hi Matthew,
You analysis is correct except following,
>I must mention that the same Compute Node that ran sparse_dd or mounted
>Secondary Storage is not always the same. It appears the Management Server is
>simply round-robining through the list of >Compute Nodes and using the first
>one that
increase performance or logs I
> should
> check?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
>
> Matthew Hartmann
> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E: mhartm...@tls.net
>
> TLS.NET, Inc.
> http://www.tls.net
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From
roughly 2 hours (if the link is saturated by the copy process); I've
> only
> found snapshotting (template creation appears to work flawlessly) to
> take an
> insanely long time to complete.
>
> Is there anything else I can do to increase performance or logs I
> should
>
snapshot on PS,
> (instead of volume snapshot)
>
> I don't think it's easy to improve vdi-copy, considering it needs to
> coalesce incremental snapshots and verify the result.
>
> mice
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citri
I remember we have a fix for this, when route VM boots up, it tries to ping
default gateway to propagate its MAC to switch.
Might be this fix is not checked into CS 4.0
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 10:59
ng the local gateways and I can see that happening when
> router VM boots up.
>
> But the fix is to ping either CS Core or CS gateway - that truly
> addresses the issue.
>
> Any thoughts of how I can create this behavior in reproducible fashion
> for all new routers?
L_GW dev eth1" from cloud-early-config
>
> Once I commented that part out - everything is working fine..
>
> What is the point of adding this extra route - if external routing
> handles that by default?
>
> In my case - the "route add" created ARP issues.
>
&
Hi join,
Try following,
Set global configuration management.network.cidr to your management server
CIDR, if this configuration is not available in UI, you can change it in DB
directly.
Restart management,
Stop/Start SSVM and CPVM.
And could you post "cat /proc/cmdline" in SSVM?
Anthony
>
CS used to have Fedora 8 as system VM.
The reason CS moves to Debian is,
1.Debian 6 has iptable checksum module
2.Debian 6 is stable
If CentOS 6.* has iptable checksum module.
I think you can.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> Sent:
Hi Charles,
This is a bug, have you filed a bug for this?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch0...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:52 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev
> Subject: Fwd: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
>
> Hi,
>
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-587
I filed the bug and fixed it.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 11:29 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev
> Subject: RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
32-bit PV might have better performance than 64-bit PV on XEN,
In 64 bit mode, there are only ring 0 and ring 3, both Guest OS and guest
application are running on ring3 , application system call needs to be trapped
into hypervisor and then be injected into guest OS.
In 32 bit mode, there are ri
ent systemvm uses GRUB-legacy since XS 5.6 only supported
> GRUB-legacy, but it might be time to move on.
>
> A more suitable systemvm build script might be based on veewee/vagrant,
> along with qemu-img to do the final conversion to vhd/qcow2
>
> --
> Chiradeep
>
>
No VLAN tags in basic network,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:ahmad.emne...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 2:54 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SSVM Network Configuration Issue
>
> On 12/6/12 10:03 AM, "John Burwell"
If it is XenServer, traffic labels are not necessary in Basic networking mode,
since there is only NIC/BONDing being used,
And which is XS management interface, CS will find it.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 3:10 PM
> To
Since we have upgrade java/script for each release, can we make upgrade
java/script read only in GIT after release?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:49 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subj
>2. The API layer provides a translation from the UUID to the internal
>DB_ID to the DB entity, but this translation is done internally. Outside users
>will never see DB_ID. Before the response is sending back by CS, API layer
>replaces the internal DB_ID with the UUID.
I thought ID->UUID
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 12/19/12 10:07 PM, "Anthony Xu" wrote:
>
> >>2. The API layer provides a translation from the UUID to the
> internal
> >>DB_ID to the DB entity, but this translation is done internally.
> Outside
> >>users will never
> In this feature
> - Root Admin should be able to dedicate a pod/cluster/host to a
> particular domain or sub-domain.
How about primary storage? Can PS be dedicated to a domain?
Can an account have dedicated resource?
> - If there is no available resources in the dedicated pod/cluster/host,
>
instead of
> currently
> querying them again during response serialization phase. For those more
> costly list APIs, for example, listVms, we will create DB views to join
> those uuids in the view to get them through one db view query.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 12/19/12 10:20
in these tables so that we can fetch those UUIDs in sort of batch
> mode
> while searching for objects to alleviate this effect.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
>
>
> On 12/19/12 10:41 PM, "Anthony Xu" wrote:
>
> >If foreign key object is not needed, only for
oreign UUID
> columns for all the tables through cross reference in upgrade, also
> need
> to consider adding code to set those foreign UUID columns in fresh
> install
> case. This scope may be too big to complete in 4.1 release.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 12/19/12 10:52 P
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 11:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Dedicate Pods, Clusters,
> Hosts to a domain
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
> My thinking is that
Linked clone is fast, it can decrease the VM provision time.
Full clone improves disk access performance.
Not share if VMware provide API to convert linked clone to full clone?
If yes, should we consider following?
Virtual disk starts with linked clone( fast VM/Disk provision).
Convert linked clo
Some questions,
Will CS support IPv6 in basic zone/network?
Does that mean CS support both host and guest IPv6 in 4.1?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:02 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject
I assume clone is a kind of snapshot in the term of VHD chain,
Does XenMotion has same restrictions on clone?
For fast provision, right now , on XenServer, root disk is cloned from template.
Before any snapshot, root disk is already a VHD with parent VHD which is
template, do you know if this has
Hi Kishan,
It's nice to have region feature, I have some questions though.
>Snapshots also should be available to all zones within a Region. CS currently
>stores snapshots in secondary storage. Snapshots should instead be stored in
>the object-store
Does this mean object-store is a requirement
Hi Dave,
For 4.1 , this feature is only for shared network on advanced zone, both
XenServer and KVM are supported.
Will upgrade FS soon.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:33 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incub
leted after you shutdown VM through
xencenter?
- I didn't see the change for KVM, is this feature only for XS.
- anthony xu
On March 4, 2013, 1:18 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-ma
om OVS mode to bridge mode because iptables doesn't work with
OVS.
Thanks,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Anthony Xu
> Subject: Re: Securit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9730/#review17736
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- anthony xu
On March 6, 2013, 12:45 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9894/#review17809
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- anthony xu
On March 13, 2013, 8:32 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7594/#review17902
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- anthony xu
On Feb. 27, 2013, 9:29 a.m
Primary storage is a SR in XenServer, the info is saved in XenServer DB.
Try following,
1. get PBD uuid ( physical block device)
xe sr-param-get uuid=d7a22e45-f860-157a-fa7c-db2e541c39d6 param-name=PBDs
a2794f1c-7456-5ff6-ab9a-15ef5bcfdfe0
2. get PBD detail
xe pbd-param-list uuid=a2794f1c-745
> vhd-tools,
We have some patches in this directory.
You may need put this directory somewhere else if you want to remove it from
ASF.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 1:21 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.
tools directory
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Anthony Xu wrote:
> >> vhd-tools,
> >
> > We have some patches in this directory.
> > You may need put this directory somewhere else if you want to remove
> it from ASF.
> >
> > Anthony
>
>
> Have they been upstreamed??
>
> --David
Thanks for providing the patch.
But this patch may introduce race condition in clustered management servers.
Consider below situation.
1. two management servers
2. M1 stop a VM , VM is stopped in backend, the StopCommand haven't return, so
the VM is still in Stopping Status.
3. restart M2, M2 s
org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] tools directory
>
> Anthony, would you be able to reach out to the Xen Community to see if
> they will take this upstream, or introduce a config that allows it to
> be disabled?
>
> -kevin
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
Hi Jason,
Need more information.
1. output of /usr/lib/virt-what/virt-what-cpuid-helper in systemvm,
2. copy virt-what-cpuid-helper to xenserver dom0, and execute
virt-what-cpuid-helper in dom0, post the result.
3. systemvm information, execute below command in dom0
Xe vm-param-list uuid='uu
cute below command in dom0 Xe vm-param-
> list uuid='uuid of systemvm'
>
> Rather large, so I attached to bug
> http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15588
>
> 4. vmware player version.
> Fusion 4.1.3 (730298) for Mac
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
Even in ESXi 5.0,
Virt-what-cpuid-helper in systemvm and bom0 return VMwareVMware,
Looks like the issue only happens in vmware fusion.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:23 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
&
Hi Lucas,
Great work,
Basically, that is a VDI-per-LUN SR.
You are right , only copy_vhd_to_secondarystorage.sh and
copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh need to handle new type of SR.
The reason we use these script to do copy VDI is that VDI-COPY is slow,
It will plug two VDIs into dom0 and do copy
We should install xe tools in systems.
Maybe we can remove xetools from repository, and get it from public website
when execute buildsystemvm.sh
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 1:58 PM
> To: CloudSta
There is no re-install option.
You can create a snapshot after you install a VM from ISO, then you can create
a template from this snapshot, then you can create a VM from the template, the
VM should like a freshly reinstalled VM.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Lu Heng [mailto:h...
t; -Original Message-----
> > From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: 20 July 2012 15:43
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: provenance of source under patches/systemvm/debian
> >
> > We should install xe tools in s
hanks for replying
>
> And why there is no simple re-install options?
>
> Sounds to me re-install options like tranditional VPS have will make
> life lot ealier than the way you have descriped
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Anthony Xu
> wrote:
> > There is no
> > So part of me says, silencing merge/cherrypick commits is the way to
> go, but
> > there is a part of me that says that having to hide all of that means
> we are
> > doing something wrong; and the part of me that is concerned with what
> is
> > going on really does want to see all of that.
>
I'll remove vhd-tools directory.
There is a binary file ./scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util.
How should we deal with it?
Regards,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 9:39 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incu
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
